Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - News

Saturday
Jul 31, 2010
Mostly Cloudy
Mostly Cloudy 92° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


Ensign e-mails contradict some ethics probe claims

Report says messages show effort to find lobbying work for husband of ex-mistress

A series of e-mails disclosed Wednesday by The New York Times documents efforts by Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., to help a former staffer line up lobbying work in the aftermath of Ensign's affair with the staffer's wife.

The newspaper posted five pieces of e-mail correspondence among Doug Hampton, the staffer in question, Ensign and others associated with the senator.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Poll: Reid, Angle neck and neck
  2. Teen dies after being shot by friend
  3. Attorney, arrested while jogging, has lawsuit pending against police
  4. Warrant seeks unlicensed process server
  5. Poll: Nevadans angry, pessimistic
  6. 'King James' feels heat of spotlight
  7. Murder charges dropped against man in gang-related incident
  8. Pacquiao-Margarito fight will happen outside of Nevada
  9. Two fires at abandoned Henderson houses under investigation
  10. High court suspends Las Vegas lawyer




"The messages are the first written records from Mr. Ensign documenting his efforts to find clients for Mr. Hampton, a top aide and close friend, after the senator had an affair with his wife, Cynthia Hampton," The Times said.

The newspaper continued: "They appear to undercut the senator's assertion that he did not know the work might involve Congressional lobbying, which could violate a ban on such activities by staff members for a year after leaving government."

Ensign is being investigated by the Senate Ethics Committee in connection with the scandal. And in January, the FBI began to investigate allegations of wrongdoing, sources have said.

Ensign acknowledged the affair but has denied any other wrongdoing.

Ensign disputed The Times' characterization of the correspondence the paper posted Wednesday.

"Any allegation or inference that Senator Ensign's motivation for doing his job as a Senator was anything but for the good of his state is completely false and misleading. He did everything necessary to ensure there was no impropriety whatsoever in this matter," Ensign spokeswoman Rebecca Fisher wrote.

She continued: "No one is more anxious for this investigation to be completed and for the facts to come out than Senator Ensign. "

The first correspondence The Times posted was an e-mail dated May 23, 2008, to Ensign from Bob Andrews, then executive vice president of P2SA Equity of Las Vegas, an alternative energy investment firm.

Andrews thanked Ensign for meeting with him and co-owner Greg Paulk regarding help the government could offer related to a biodiesel plant and another project near Sloan.

He concluded: "Give me information regarding next week's fundraising and we will certainly attend."

The e-mail was forwarded to Hampton from Ensign's account with the comment, "I think you have played golf with him. This is who I met with."

The Times concluded the correspondence is evidence Ensign met with Andrews with the goal of helping Hampton get work, which Hampton needed following his departure from Ensign's office in the affair aftermath.

The paper also reported that Andrews' comment about fundraising concerned members of Ensign's staff. Subsequently, Ensign returned $1,666.66 of a $10,000 donation Paulk made to a political action committee Ensign shares with several other politicians. The refund represented Ensign's share of the contribution, according to the paper.

More e-mails posted by The Times include statements from Hampton asserting Ensign was lining up lobbying work. Hampton has made the assertion numerous times .

One message from Ensign consultant Mike Slanker to Hampton seeks to soothe the embittered former staffer.

The note, dated May 26, 2008, assures Hampton that Slanker spoke with Ensign about the possibility P2SA might have lobbying work available.

In a subsequent e-mail, Hampton tells Ensign: "You ensured me that you would have no issues getting at least three clients and that more than likely I would make more money consulting than I did working for the Senate."

In another Hampton says P2SA declined to hire him.

"Bob (finally) got back to me and they have decided they do not need service at this time," the Hampton e-mail to Ensign said.

A woman who answered the phone Wednesday at P2SA's listed number said Andrews is no longer with the firm. She said she would leave a message with Paulk.

Slanker did not return an e-mail seeking comment, and attorney Daniel Albregts, who has represented Hampton, was unavailable for comment.

Contact reporter Benjamin Spillman at bspillman@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3861.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Comments (30)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

X

Register to comment

* Indicates fields that are required
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Male Female

Already registered? Log in now

X

Already registered to comment?

Log in below
E-mail
Password

Forgot your password? | Register
X

Forgot your password?

Enter your e-mail address below and a password will be resent to you.

Email
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Report abuse

citizen wrote on April 17, 2010 11:27 PM: vince queano is a great person


Report abuse

hello wrote on April 17, 2010 11:27 PM: vincent queano is a good person


Report abuse

anonymous wrote on April 17, 2010 11:26 PM: vince queano is a good person


Report abuse

unknown wrote on April 17, 2010 11:26 PM: vincent queano is a great person


Report abuse

unknown wrote on April 17, 2010 11:25 PM: vince queano is a great person


Report abuse

Yes In know wrote on March 11, 2010 12:50 PM: Yes I know it is proven and not proved but I am dealing with a bunch of degenerate morons here.


Report abuse

Jack.Webb wrote on March 11, 2010 11:54 AM: Well lookee here: another con (besides Ensign) bites the dust:

A prominent friend and supporter of James Dobson believes Dobson was pushed aside by the new leadership of Focus on the Family, who want the powerhouse evangelical ministry to project a softer image on issues ranging from abortion to gay marriage to relations with President Obama.


Report abuse

Rob wrote on March 11, 2010 11:51 AM: Ensign is a joke, he is thinking with the wrong head.


Report abuse

OhYeah wrote on March 11, 2010 11:46 AM: Ensign is obviously guilty let's stop lying to each other, and he's definitely a scum bag who slept with his BEST FRIEND'S WIFE !!! That's about as low as you get. He didn't have the decency to think about his children, at the very least. Another Repugnant Republican loser.

And the RJ is like Fox Noise, they don't let the truth get in the way of their opinions. Total trash...


Report abuse

Wrong title wrote on March 11, 2010 11:36 AM: This story has the wrong title, shouldn't it be:

Ensign emails contridict Senators claim of no illegalities.

The title makes it appear that the ethics probe was in error.

Oh well Johnny is the kind of slime the RJ and FAUX support.

Corrupt politicians make for a corrupt state. Anyone that supports Ensign is just as corrupt.


Read All Comments