Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


POLITICAL NOTEBOOK: Ensign still pushing health bill alternative

Republican calls Democratic proposals too expensive

Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., is still working on health care legislation he first mentioned Aug. 25 during an appearance at the dedication of a shooting range in Las Vegas.

He says the idea is to produce an alternative to the bills coming from majority Democratic members, which he says will be too costly.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • NORM: 'Girls Gone Wild' creator feels heat
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford




  • Ensign says he envisions health reform similar to a program implemented by Safeway Inc., which reduced health costs as much as 40 percent in part through offering incentives for healthy behavior.

    "We know right there, if you can encourage more people to quit smoking and eat right and exercise, you are going to save money," Ensign said last week.

    Specifically, he wants to allow insurers to increase the percentage discount they can offer for healthy behavior from 20 percent to 50 percent.

    Other measures he wants in a bill include tort reform that would restrict how much money courts could award victims of malpractice for pain and suffering. He says President Barack Obama has given the subject short shrift.

    "What he has been trying to do on it is pretty pathetic," Ensign said of Obama.

    Ensign says there's not much opposition in Congress to a few elements of reform, such as preventing insurance companies from denying customers with pre-existing conditions or rescinding insurance for people after they're sick.

    But when asked if he supported extending insurance coverage to every American, a key goal for Obama and many Democrats, Ensign said, "Should every American get health care insurance? I don't know that our country can afford it."

    He added, "There is no honest way to do that. You are either going to run up the deficit or (have) massive tax increases. I don't think the American people are ready for either one of those."

    So far, Ensign says he hasn't identified co-sponsors ready to sign onto his proposals. He is hopeful to package his measures into a bill that would be an alternative to majority-sponsored legislation. But he acknowledges they may have to be offered as amendments.

    He says the political fallout from an extramarital affair scandal and subsequent payments from his family to the family of the mistress he acknowledged isn't hampering his ability to work in Washington.

    "I'm focused on doing my job up here. I have great relationships with my colleagues. I've found absolutely no problems working with my colleagues in any way shape or form."

    HECK MAKES PLEDGE

    To Heck with taxes.

    That's what former state Sen. Joe Heck, now a candidate for governor in the Republican primary, said when he put his Joe Heck on a "taxpayer protection pledge" put forth by a group called Americans for Tax Reform.

    Here's what Heck says about the decision on his Web site:

    "By signing the pledge, Heck is making a commitment to the people of Nevada that he will not raise taxes. The pledge states that as Nevada's Governor, Heck will 'oppose and veto any and all efforts to increase taxes.'"

    The pledge could become an issue in the Republican primary as new-to-the-field candidate Brian Sandoval says he won't sign.

    "I've just never been a believer in signing pledges. I'm more than happy to sit down with everyone who wants to talk about those things, and I think anyone who is seeking for me to sign a pledge of any kind once they sit down with me they'll understand perfectly where I'm coming from when it comes to spending and that I'm very fiscally conservative," Sandoval said.

    Whether anyone can adhere to the pledge-in-question and balance the state budget without making major cuts to education and other state services is another story.

    Asked about the prospects of balancing the budget in 2011 -- a $2.4 billion difference between revenue and expenses is now expected -- with cuts alone, Jeremy Aguero of the economics research firm Applied Analysis said, "I don't know anyone who would believe that is possible."

    Keith Schwer, director for the Center for Business and Economic Development at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, was more blunt in response to Sandoval's claims he could cut the state's budget into balance.

    "How many firemen and how many policeman does he want to fire? How many children are not going to have a teacher in front of them. Those are the decisions that go with that," Schwer said.

    He continued by saying voters shouldn't expect campaigning politicians to even acknowledge the tough choices ahead, let alone offer realistic solutions.

    "To get elected, prudence is not a word these people are familiar with," he said. "Unfortunately, governors are elected for a short period. The critical secret to economic growth is taking that long term view."

    GOVERNOR'S RACE

    That didn't take long.

    Just days after former federal judge Brian Sandoval announced he was running for governor, the Nevada gubernatorial race became one of the highest-profile state races in the country.

    Don't believe it? Ask the folks at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

    The Washington, D.C.,-based group already has dinged Sandoval, a Republican, by calling for him to answer questions about whether he engaged in campaign activity during his term on the federal bench that ended Sept. 15.

    "Sandoval has set himself up as an ethics candidate in a race that will get national attention," said Melanie Sloan, executive director for the group, colloquially known as CREW.

    An opinion Sandoval sought from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on what campaign related activity a still-serving judge can do restricted him to private consultations with a tight inner circle and no spending of money or polling.

    "In other words, your initial foray into discussion of the issue should not involve any public solicitation, inquiry or polling," the opinion from judge Margaret McKeown stated.

    CREW cites a caller to their office who said she received a call from a "push poll" that was clearly testing arguments in favor of Sandoval and against potential opponents. CREW also referred to reports of a poll done by the Republican Governors Association.

    A spokesman from the Republican Governors Association says the group regularly uses polls to test candidates and even rumored candidates. The spokesman also said the poll that mentioned Sandoval wasn't shared with anyone outside the organization.

    Sandoval has said political consultant Pete Ernaut told him results of independent polls, but both Ernaut and Sandoval say they didn't instigate any polling.

    "Without any question he had no knowledge or participation in any polls," Ernaut said of Sandoval.

    Ernaut also said his discussions with Sandoval were as a friend, the two men have known each other for decades.

    "I'm not hired, nor am I going to be hired. I am a longtime friend of Brian's. I'm not going to take a paid role in the campaign at all," Ernaut said.

    Sandoval is one of several candidates for governor on the Republican side. Others include former state Sen. Joe Heck, former North Las Vegas Mayor Mike Montandon and incumbent Jim Gibbons. On the Democratic side, Clark County Commissioner Rory Reid is the leading candidate. Reid has a Web site and has raised money but has not formally declared as a candidate in public.

    'NO, NO, NO, NO'

    Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Las Vegas, is getting tired of all the publicity congressional Republicans are getting by attacking health reform proposals by emphasizing fears illegal immigrants will glom onto the system.

    "This myth that illegal immigrants are covered under this legislation has now reached mythical proportions," she said a few days after Rep. Joe Wilson, R-S.C., interrupted a nationally televised speech by Obama.

    "The bill says nothing, nothing that would indicate illegals are covered in some manner or fashion," Berkley said.

    She also urged people to put themselves in the shoes of an innocent person seeking urgent health care and being accused of breaking the law.

    "It is very insulting when the finger is pointed at you. All of a sudden it is demanded you show your citizenship before you get health care," she said. "What if you can't get your hands on it? What form of identification would be adequate."

    She said it's especially exasperating when reform opponents demand the inclusion of restrictive amendments without any intention of ever voting for a bill.

    "In general, you can't say no, no, no, no," she said.

    Contact reporter Benjamin Spillman at bspillman@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3861.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 18 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    LCDR Mandingo, NAM vet wrote on September 21, 2009 06:02 PM: This sounds a lot like the Mormons Vietnam War health care plan. Mormons don't FIGHT, smoke weed or cigs, drink coffee-beer-whiskey, soda pop, or mess with Southeast Asian career-girls.


    Jen wrote on September 21, 2009 05:42 PM: Guess no opposition wants to enter the FICA territory?

    At 37 I'm not holding my breath that the FICA I pay today will do anything for me in 33 years, but it's good to be optimistic!! :)

    I'm just happy that during my uninsured, poor, college student years I wasn't diagnosed with anything that could be considered "pre-existing" ...


    belinda wrote on September 21, 2009 03:06 PM: You can never tell when Berkley is lying since she will obtain another rhinoplasty.At the peoples expense of coarse.


    KePat wrote on September 21, 2009 02:35 PM: """"before you come back with: "We have to have car insurance so it's not Socialist". That is because the government does not demand that you buy a car. Yet!""""

    Ummm, you have to have car insurance not to protect YOU but others. Reagan signed the law that mandated all have access to care at emergency rooms. Those w/o insurance put a burden on all the rest of us.

    Take a look at you County tax statement! Homeowners pay an indigent health care tax! Too, OUR health care premiums repay hospitals for their "free" care of the uninsured and that is why an aspirin cost $10!

    FICA is the price you pay today for the assurance that the generations behind you will provide YOUR Medicare. Try getting affordable health insurance at age 70!


    Jen wrote on September 21, 2009 12:54 PM: LOL - I must've missed the "Word of the Day" definitions on Faux News.

    Requiring everyone to have insurance is not defined as socialism, and that wasn't Morgan's point.

    Morgan thinks there is going to be "free" health insurance for everybody, including those who choose to sit on their behinds and not work. That's what Morgan is protesting. The same old arguement against democrats in general. We don't want to work, we want something for nothing, blah, blah, blah.

    So, answer my question - do you see a problem with FICA when a lot of the people who are paying for someone else's insurance don't have insurance themselves? How is that not an issue? How is that ok?


    Mike Ault wrote on September 21, 2009 12:51 PM: Why all the fuss whether or not illegals are covered in the health care bill? They are already covered, bill or not. They just walk into any Emergency Room and get whatever treatment they require ABSOLUTELY FREE! Well, free to them. You and I end up picking up the tag. So, what's the difference? Ergo, what's the big debate all about? Taxpayers have already lost.


    blak wrote on September 21, 2009 12:20 PM: before you come back with: "We have to have car insurance so it's not Socialist". That is because the government does not demand that you buy a car. Yet!


    Morgan Silver wrote on September 21, 2009 11:56 AM: I don't recall supporting forced FICA payments, and certainly not for lower-wage jobs. Besides, the way it was SUPPOSED to work is that you're not paying for someone else, you are, in effect, prepaying your own coverage at some future time. Doesn't work that way, but that's because benefits have ballooned to cover all sorts of thins never envisioned by anyone fifty years ago.

    But Jen has a point. In England right now they struggle with the fact that being on the dole "pays" roughly 15,000 pounds per year while working at a low-wage job actually pays less. Thus they have a hard time getting even ONE family member to work at a job rather than sit on his bum all day.

    Shelley the Socialist would see us move into an economy much like England's with millions upon millions on the dole, while the government steals more and more from those who do work to pay for "entitlements" for those who never earned them.


    blak wrote on September 21, 2009 11:55 AM: Jen. Your missing the point. Obama is requesting mandatory insurance and you will be penalized financially for not carrying insurance. That is socialism. Your will be required to participate or else!!!! Is this helping you out at all?


    Jen wrote on September 21, 2009 11:30 AM: Ok Morgan, what about all those who work and pay FICA on every single check who have no benefits - they are in fact, paying for medicare for someone else. Does that seem fair??

    When I was in college, I worked for a Dr. a good portion of my itty-bitty check went to FICA while I listened to the medicare patients complain about their deductible and I had no insurance.

    What exactly is "fair" about that? Why would you think that giving working people an option to have health insurance socialism?


    Read All Comments