Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


LEWDNESS WITH MINORS: Ex-teacher loses challenge to case

Court rejects appeal over charges, testimony

CARSON CITY -- The life imprisonment sentences a former Henderson elementary schoolteacher received for lewdness with three fifth-grade girls will stand.

The Nevada Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously rejected an appeal filed by Mark Zana that challenged the three lewdness with minors charges and six possession of child pornography charges for which he was convicted in December 2007.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • Two suspects in officer's slaying could face death penalty
  • Corrections officer dies in collision on U.S. 95
  • NORM: 'Girls Gone Wild' creator feels heat




  • Zana, 41, is serving time in the Lovelock Correction Center. He received 10-year-to-life sentences on each of the lewdness charges and one to three years on each pornography charge.

    In his appeal, Zana contended the Clark County district attorney's office inappropriately admitted testimony about previous encounters he had with female students in Pennsylvania in 1992 and in Henderson in 1998.

    Records in the cases had been sealed when one student refused to testify and in the other after Zana agreed to a plea bargain not to teach minors.

    Zana also contended that a juror at his trial in 2007 committed misconduct by going to a pornographic Web site to try to look at the pictures for which he was charged with child pornography.

    Zana had contended the pictures did not show girls under age 16 in sexual situations, for which the child pornography law applies.

    The case grew out of allegations by six students who said Zana either touched their breasts or invited them to place their hands in his pocket to get candy.

    During their investigation, prosecutors discovered Zana had sealed records of accusations in Pennsylvania, where he was alleged to have fondled a girl's breast, and in Henderson, where he was accused of enticing a second-grader to touch his penis by getting candy out of his pocket.

    Prosecutors sought to use the sealed cases to rebut arguments by Zana that the touching of his fifth-grade students was accidental.

    District Judge Jackie Glass, at his 2007 trial, allowed students from the earlier cases to testify.

    Justices said Glass appropriately excluded information from the sealed cases but correctly allowed the girls to talk about matters not subject to the sealing.

    "Neither the Pennsylvania order nor the Henderson order erased the witnesses' memories of Zana's inappropriate conduct," the high court said.

    Justices said that in a previous case, a decision by the Metropolitan Police Department to deny a private detective license to a convicted felon was upheld, though records of his crimes had been sealed.

    The officers investigating his situation had personal knowledge of his criminal history.

    While it was misconduct for a juror to try to find pictures of girls that police found on Zana's home computer, justices said, the incident did not rise to the level of granting Zana a new trial.

    The juror never found the Web site, and his search was mentioned only briefly during deliberations, according to the court.

    Zana also contended that he should not have been tried on child pornography charges because they were unconnected to the lewdness charges.

    But the court said to prove the lewdness charges, the state had to show he touched young girls for the "purpose of gratifying his lust, passions or sexual desires."

    The pornography found on his computer "suggests Zana found pornography images of young females sexually gratifying," the court said.

    Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 6 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Seiva wrote on October 03, 2009 05:21 PM: Don't pop the cork yet mom. It ain't over until the fat lady sings...er...that would be you!!!!! RJC-- The family hired Oram so get your facts straight and quit being jealous of lawyers that are better and get the big money appeals. Go back to Law 101 and then maybe you can compete.


    JC wrote on September 25, 2009 02:34 PM: Which appointed appellate attorney are you "RJC Watchdog"?


    Mom wrote on September 25, 2009 01:52 PM: ha ha ha, we will celebrate tonight!


    RJC Watchdog wrote on September 25, 2009 09:45 AM: Another case in which Drew Christensen appoints his friend Chris Oram to another big money appeal, I assume.

    Was Pete Christiansen too busy, or do they just rotate?


    too bad so sad wrote on September 25, 2009 08:20 AM: Aww...he didn't get off on a technicality...poor baby.


    Abolish_public_education wrote on September 25, 2009 07:41 AM: If the PA case was sealed, how did NV prosecutors learn the names of his alleged PA victims?