Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - News

Thursday
Sep 9, 2010
Partly Cloudy
Partly Cloudy 76° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

sponsored by
News


Federal panel to examine nuclear waste storage

Yucca Mountain won't be included in options

By STEVE TETREAULT

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration continued its march away from Yucca Mountain on Friday with the naming of a 15-member panel of experts to chart new paths to manage highly radioactive nuclear waste.


Most Popular Stories
  1. 'Now she's saying she'll never fly again. ... Ever'
  2. Shooter kills sister, himself; boy wounded
  3. Another shakeup in Wynn's world
  4. Man arrested for throwing fatal punch
  5. Fake bomb device was defibrillator
  6. Police say at least one person dead in murder-suicide try
  7. Clark County Commission rejects Arberry's bid for lobby position
  8. Shotgun-wielding man shot by Las Vegas police named
  9. Nye County District Attorney Bob Beckett arrested again
  10. Police searching for missing 10-year-old boy




The commission will be led by two Washington policy veterans, former Rep. Lee Hamilton and longtime presidential adviser Brent Scowcroft, the Energy Department announced.

Other members are well known, including former Sens. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., and Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., former high-ranking government energy officials, and representatives of the nuclear industry, organized labor, environmental groups and academia.

The Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future will be given two years to do its work. A draft report will be due in 18 months.

Energy Secretary Steven Chu said the commission will have a free hand to examine a "full range of scientific and technical options" on waste storage, reprocessing and disposal, with one exception: the once-favored Yucca Mountain underground repository.

Talking with reporters, Chu and chief White House energy adviser Carol Browner made it clear that the Nevada site, which had been the government's sole focus for more than 20 years, is off the table.

"The debate over Yucca Mountain is over, as the president has made clear many times," said Browner, director of the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy.

"It is time to move forward with a new strategy based on the best science and the advice of a broad range of experts," Browner said.

Hamilton said Chu made it "quite clear that nuclear waste storage at Yucca Mountain is not an option, and that the blue ribbon commission will be looking at better alternatives."

The idea of storing, and ultimately burying, nuclear spent fuel underground is outdated, Hamilton said, adding, "It has been made clear to me that science has advanced dramatically since the Yucca site was chosen 20 years ago or so. We are going to pull together the current information and research to develop a plan."

The naming of a commission is believed to be another step in the dismantlement of the Yucca Mountain Project, which long has been a lightning rod among environmentalists and many people in Nevada, including virtually all the state's elected leaders.

The project was envisioned as a warren of tunnels deep inside Yucca Mountain, 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas, where at least 77,000 tons of spent fuel from commercial plants, and government-generated nuclear waste, would be stored and ultimately buried.

The cost had grown to almost $100 billion and fell more than a decade beyond schedule because of a series of management missteps, legal challenges and budget cuts engineered by opponents in Congress.

The next step down could come on Monday when the Obama administration releases its proposed 2011 federal budget. The budget is expected to contain only token funding for the program.

Its downfall traces to an alliance between Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., and President Barack Obama, who pledged early in his White House campaign to end the repository and has kept his promises so far.

Reid said Chu assembled "some of the smartest people in the country" for the commission.

"President Obama and I have worked closely to stop dumping taxpayer money into Yucca, and I have fought hard to ensure Yucca Mountain is dead," Reid said. "This panel of experts proposing other options for nuclear waste is the logical next step in that process."

Other Nevadans in Congress echoed the sentiment.

Democratic Rep. Shelley Berkley said Obama was fulfilling his promise to end the repository project. Democratic Rep. Dina Titus said the commission means "we are closer than ever to ensuring Yucca Mountain never becomes a reality."

Bruce Breslow, executive director of the Agency for Nuclear Projects, said formation of the panel was encouraging, but the state's fight against the project would end only when the Department of Energy withdraws a repository license application under review at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist, said Friday that it is time to look ahead. Solving the nuclear waste problem is important to the goal adopted by the administration to promote nuclear power as a response to climate change.

Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

BLUE RIBBON COMMISSION ON AMERICA'S NUCLEAR FUTURE
• Co-chairman: Former Rep. Lee Hamilton of Indiana. President and director of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, and director of The Center on Congress at Indiana University
• Co-chairman: Brent Scowcroft, president, The Scowcroft Group, an international business advisory firm
• Mark Ayers, president, Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO
• Vicky Bailey, former commissioner, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; former Department of Energy assistant secretary for policy and international affairs
• Albert Carnesale, chancellor emeritus and professor, UCLA
• Pete V. Domenici, senior fellow, Bipartisan Policy Center; former U.S. senator from New Mexico
• Susan Eisenhower, president, Eisenhower Group
• Chuck Hagel, former U.S. senator from Nebraska
• Jonathan Lash, president, World Resources Institute
• Allison Macfarlane, associate professor of environmental science and policy, George Mason University
• Dick Meserve, former chairman, Nuclear Regulatory Commission
• Ernie Moniz, professor of physics and Cecil & Ida Green Distinguished Professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
• Per Peterson, professor and chairman, Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California-Berkeley
• John Rowe, chairman and chief executive officer, Exelon Corp.
• Phil Sharp, president, Resources for the Future
Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Comments (24)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

X

Register to comment

* Indicates fields that are required
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Male Female

Already registered? Log in now

X

Already registered to comment?

Log in below
E-mail
Password

Forgot your password? | Register
X

Forgot your password?

Enter your e-mail address below and a password will be resent to you.

Email
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Report abuse

Paul wrote on February 02, 2010 08:42 AM: If we are letting the science and technology decide how the waste is to be disposed, then why is Yucca excluded?
If the science and technology decides, why is the commission being loaded with a bunch of political pundits and not people with science and technological resumes?


Report abuse

arda.higbee wrote on February 01, 2010 05:34 PM: comments, on this topic make me so mad, here we have thousands of homes empty, apartments vacant, 13% of our people out of work, take a bus trip out to see the repository, this is what the surrounding states are wanting to build for nuclear low leval waste, put a short term storage there, put our people to work building a nuclear power plant in the same area, this is exactly what all the other states wants, we have the nations top building site for this long awaited power source,and Senator Reid, has called if off,the Democrats and I am one of them, have for years built this up for this purpose, can they not finish what they started forty or more years ago, and put our families to work, lets call someone that is interested in money from that tax base coming into our schools, and getting Nevada up and running as the Democrats intended it to be those many years ago. Arda Higbee


Report abuse

Jeff Kriner wrote on February 01, 2010 12:13 PM: I find it misleading that neither Reid nor Obama mention the fact this move to cancel the Yucca Mountain Project (YMP) will cost the taxpayer 60+ billion (repay approximately 30 billion in funds paid by nuclear utilities, plus repay another 30 billion in lawsuits for their on site storage costs for spent fuel). What a tragedy! Besides safely resolving our nuclear waste disposal problem, the YMP would bring about 1 billion per year into Nevada's economy.


Report abuse

Craig wrote on February 01, 2010 10:46 AM: Thank You Senator Reid for stopping a nuclear disaster in Nevada. Only the right-wing wackos who hate everything Reid does for no reason are against Yucca closing.


Report abuse

Lance wrote on February 01, 2010 09:53 AM: Why is a Labor representative on this blue ribbon panel? What does he know about storing nuclear waste?

I understand this is a good way to develop a plan that people can get behind, If we are going to abandon Yucca Mountain. I also agree Yucca Mountain is dead. Obama was wise to get some political support out of it at least. I doubt there is anything more to be had.

I wonder what will become of all the funds the utilities were forced to contribute, or has that all been spent already?


Report abuse

Billy Mays wrote on February 01, 2010 09:24 AM: I am curious how this is expected to affect the Vitrification Plant Project at the DOE Hanford site in Washington State. That project, in a sense, went "hand in hand" with Yucca Mountain.


Report abuse

Mike Downs wrote on February 01, 2010 09:18 AM: How come Sen Reid never mentions all the money the nuclear utilities paid to develop Yucca mountain. Remember when the feds signed a CONTRACT with the utilities in the 80's to develop this. And in return the Utility forked over BILLIONS of dollars. Back when a billion meant something. The contract was to have the site ready in 1998. As usual in our govt. science will always take a back seat to politics. And does anyone really believe another commission will do anything??? Or just waste more money. Remember folks whoever pocket it first comes out of; it will eventually come out of yours!! Are you tired of politicians wasting money (regardless of which party)!


Report abuse

Fred Zyphel wrote on January 31, 2010 06:16 AM: This just isn't right. The NWPA is the law and it is being subverted by a weak-willed Congress led by arrogant and narrow-minded fools, and a syncophant president - who all seem unwilling to do what is right and needed for the nation.

It is a sad day for this country when Congress abrogates its policy making and legislative authority to some committee of "the anointed". I didn't vote for any of those people, did you?

The ones we did vote are showing their true colors: traitors to their oaths of office, selfish political hacks, shirkers, reprobates, and cowards.


Report abuse

Mark wrote on January 30, 2010 12:16 PM: I have to laugh every time I read what people post on this site. Everyone fought the Yucca site, and if this administration said they were going to push forward with it, there would be just as many posts bashing this administration as there are now. Nevadans wanted the site closed, and this administration has said they will support your wishes, and you are still mad?

Just a few years ago I remember reading posts from republicans bashing Reid for NOT shutting Yucca down. You are now getting the change you asked for, and you are mad about it.


Report abuse

AIP wrote on January 30, 2010 12:08 PM: Can anyone tell me what the government will use Yuccan mountain for now that $100 billion has been spent on it already? Maybe they can use it as a bunker for government employees when the world ends. How happy and cozy they would be. Maybe if a bit of waste is stored there they would be able to glow in the dark after a while. Maybe this could become the new Gitmo.


Read More Comments