Comments (91) | Add a comment
John L. Smith
Firefighters fight uphill battle explaining wage concessions
Tools
More Columns
More Blogs
Few things are as unabashedly American as mom, baseball and apple pie.
Then one day you learn your mother wasn't all that fond of you. And it turns out those big leaguers were a bunch of steroid freaks. Then you discover the apple pie you love packs enough fat to stop your heart.
That, in brief, puts into perspective what Southern Nevada firefighters are experiencing these days. Once considered heroes who were essentially politically untouchable, they're increasingly being criticized for their high salaries and benefits as well as their unwillingness to take deep pay cuts to help balance recession-strapped local government budgets.
From the reaction I'm getting after Tuesday's column on the North Las Vegas firefighter union's attempt to remind skeptics that its members are sacrificing sufficiently, the first responders still have some work to do.
Valley firefighters getting blasted by the citizens: In all my years as a columnist, I've never seen anything like it.
In an advertisement in today's Review-Journal, the North Las Vegas union has attempted to explain how members offered to defer their cost of living allowances for the next two years, but city officials say that isn't nearly enough at a time they are compelled to lay off 204 workers to offset a $33.4 million shortfall.
Writes one reader: "I am one of the other 204 employees which are losing their job. I feel it's just as much the firefighters' and police department's position to give up employees as we have. Why put all the jobs lost on Teamsters positions, public works, administration and other vital parts of the city? The city spent a lot to train me at my position and now they're going to lose it. I know from experience how hard their job is. I went through training in the military. That's my opinion."
Says another, "They do have a dangerous job, but they are no better than any other city or county worker that has taken pay cuts. I have no problem with job cuts."
Still another says: "What a joke. If these heroes don't think that they are overpaid, they should have a reporter follow them for a week and see how much work they actually do. That will never happen because it will expose how overcompensated they are. And I love the argument that laying them off would put the public in danger. I don't believe it would, but it seems by their logic they'd rather put the public at risk than take a small pay cut. The firefighters also don't seem to mind laying off the newbies as long as the senior members don't have to make concessions. Pure greed."
Ouch. Someone call a paramedic.
While they were mightily outnumbered, some readers came to the firefighters' defense.
One writes, "I'm so pleased to see that the North Las Vegas firefighters are stepping up and offering to give up raises to help their city. They are showing why firefighters have always been held in such high regards. Hopefully the city will come to their senses."
Another offers, "I'm glad to see some of the firefighters in this valley are willing to give back. I think it is ridiculous that the cities are still wanting to lay off firefighters and close down fire engines."
And another says, "Nice. Finally some evidence the firefighters get it and are trying to step up and do the right thing. Take care of business boys, we'd like to respect you again."
But many more reflected the tenor of this reader: "Does anyone other than the firefighters and their families honestly believe that they are not overpaid? I'm not disputing that they do a good job, but that doesn't mean they should be grossly overpaid."
With public sentiment running against them for the first time in memory, valley firefighters are overdue for an emergency response.
John L. Smith's column appears Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. E-mail him at Smith@reviewjournal.com or call (702) 383-0295. He also blogs at lvrj.com/blogs/smith.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
So, when can we expect the inert media (who let this wage insanity go underreported for so long) to actually get off their *sses and quietly monitor how "busy" our public servants actually are...it should be easy...just post some reporters in Walmart during "working" hours...the story will come to you...
COMMON SENSE- it's funny how when you call someone out and hit the nail on the head it takes awhile before they post again. I guess he's looking out the windows saying to himself..."how did he know?"
common sense--- I'm reading your posts and you very seldom touch on the actual issues being discussed. All you seem to want to do is " stir the pot".
You degrade FF's but never really say why.
Soooooo, how long have you worked for the RJ? Now don't lie. If anything we are all being honest on this blog. We may not like what we are hearing, but we all are keeping our integrity. How about you?
Sorry not an ambulance driver. Most people here would rather ambulance drivers get the huge paychecks though. Good to know who you look down on. Everyone wants to feel superior to someone, I guess firefighters are superior to ambulance drivers. HOW PATHETIC YOU PEOPLE REALLY ARE!!!
Las Vegas Firefighter (NOT)- That "Tiller" was moved to that area so LFVR could keep their ISO class 1 ratting. I'm sure you know what that means, right genius? No, let me tell you moron. That means businesses in Vegas have lower insurance rates (because of your FD that you hate so much). Let me go a step further due to your mental limitations......Less insurance = less retail prices for you......more insurance costs = rising retail costs... Clear as mud einstein? What a jag**f
How much would you expect to be paid if you had to treat a 15 year old girl that had just taken off the top of her head with a self inflicted shot gun blast? or to have feces and blood coughed on you from a 75 year old with a gastrointestinal bleed? or cut the lifeless body of a 10 year old from a horrific car wreckage? Would 20 to 30 dollars per hour be enough? Thats what we make. Check the facts. Not a hero, just a firefighter/paramedic doing his job.