Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - News

Sunday
Sep 5, 2010
Sunny
Sunny 101° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


Group: Pipeline would threaten fish

Authorization for natural gas project rushed, lawsuit argues

A conservation group fears Lahontan cutthroat trout and other endangered fish will be impacted by a Texas company's plans for a $3 billion natural gas pipeline across Northern Nevada and three other Western states.

The Center for Biological Diversity, based in Tucson, Ariz., filed a lawsuit Friday in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals naming the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as respondents.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Northbound 1-15 lanes remain closed after fatal crash involving taxicab
  2. Angle faces copyright lawsuit over R-J articles
  3. Body of promoter Arum's son found in Washington mountains
  4. Woman found dead amid clutter became compulsive
  5. Man arrested after false bomb threat
  6. Fator grows his audience on road
  7. Border Patrol finds success in curbing illegal immigration, targets Las Vegas
  8. Employee focus of an earlier inquiry
  9. NLV judge: Some cases not being prosecuted
  10. UNLV-Wisconsin: No. 12 Badgers beat Rebels 41-21 at Sam Boyd Stadium




The suit challenges decisions by those agencies that allow construction of the 677-mile Ruby natural gas pipeline across more than 1,000 rivers and streams from Opal, Wyo., to Malin, Ore.

A subsidiary of El Paso Corp., of Houston, plans to construct a 42-inch-diameter pipeline across Wyoming, Utah, Nevada and Oregon. It's scheduled to go into operation next year, according to the company's website.

The center says the pipeline would cut across 209 streams where federally protected fish, including Lahontan cutthroat, live.

Lahontan cutthroat, a threatened trout in Nevada, was listed for protection 40 years ago under a precursor to the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Its populations are scattered across streams and drainages in Northern Nevada where the pipeline would run.

"If there's one lesson we should have learned from the Gulf (of Mexico) disaster, it's that things can and do go wrong when regulatory agencies don't do their jobs," said the center's endangered species coordinator, Noah Greenwald.

"If the pipeline ruptures at a stream crossing, it could have devastating consequences for these endangered fish and other stream life," he said, referring to the Lahontan cutthroat, Warner Creek sucker, Lost River sucker, and the Colorado pikeminnow .

His comments came as the Environmental Protection Agency was assessing habitat damage Friday from 1 million gallons of oil that leaked into Michigan's Kalamazoo River.

Beside the impact from constructing the pipeline, including use of 400 million gallons of river water and groundwater, Greenwald said if the pipeline ruptures, it could result in explosions and fires that could raise the temperature of streams and kill fish.

El Paso Corp. pipelines have ruptured and exploded in the past, killing 12 people in Carlsbad, N.M., in 2000, and hurting three people in a more recent incident in Bushland, Texas.

Neither rupture was discussed in the Fish and Wildlife Service's final review although the service had noted other concerns for threatened and endangered species in a letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission dated 2008.

The commission approved the pipeline project on April 5, and rights-of-way were granted by the BLM on July 12, about a month after the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had issued its biological opinion for the project.

In its lawsuit, the center argues that the commission and the BLM rushed the project's authorization before information about environmental impacts was submitted and mitigation measures were considered by the agencies.

A BLM spokeswoman in Nevada said bureau officials hadn't seen the lawsuit yet and couldn't comment on it.

Contact reporter Keith Rogers at krogers@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0308.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Comments (4)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

X

Register to comment

* Indicates fields that are required
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Male Female

Already registered? Log in now

X

Already registered to comment?

Log in below
E-mail
Password

Forgot your password? | Register
X

Forgot your password?

Enter your e-mail address below and a password will be resent to you.

Email
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Report abuse

GARY D wrote on July 31, 2010 11:07 AM: Don't build the pipeline --- We have enough oil / nat gas / coal in the U.S. for the next 500 years, but "IT'S MUCH BETTER WE KEEP GIVING OUR $$$$$$ TO THE ARABS (that hate us)" Stupid is, as stupid does. Eat the fish, build the pipeline.


Report abuse

Jack.Webb wrote on July 31, 2010 07:16 AM: "RightWingExtremist wrote on July 31, 2010 06:13 AM: eco-terrorists."

"Eco-terrorists". My, now that's a dramatic, contrived term.

Sounds just like the drama-queen psycho-talkers on AM radio.

Take a deep breath.


Report abuse

RightWingExtremist wrote on July 31, 2010 06:13 AM: I see the green weenies are at it again. Instead of being for distributing clean burning natural gas, they're up in arms about some obscure "thing" that no one else has ever heard of and will do anything to protect this useless "thing." I thought the eco-terrorists were all for clean energy and natural gas is that energy. Or would these stupid idiots prefer that the electricity that they depend on be generated by burning all that nasty coal?


Report abuse

bill wrote on July 31, 2010 06:00 AM: "killed 12 in 2000".........why don't you do stories about the 200-300 that are killed daily in the USA by automobiles