Comments (8) | Add a comment
Trial for Doug Hampton remains months away
-
Peter Urban/Stephens Washington Bureau
Doug Hampton, right, walks with his attorney to a Friday morning court appearance in Washington, D.C.
Tools
STEPHENS WASHINGTON BUREAU
WASHINGTON -- Attorneys on Friday continued a slow march toward trial for Doug Hampton, the one-time U.S. Senate aide entwined in the scandal that felled former Sen. John Ensign of Nevada.
U.S. District Court Judge Beryl Howell set a series of deadlines for pretrial activities stretching into September before Hampton would be tried on seven counts of violating a federal lobbying law. A trial might start late in the year.
Hampton, a former Las Vegan, appeared in court for the first time since he issued an innocent plea in April. He had been declared indigent by the court, which flew him at government expense from Southern California, where he now lives.
"I'm OK," Hampton said as he was leaving Howell's courtroom after a brief hearing. He and his attorney, Federal Public Defender A.J. Kramer, declined to talk further about the case.
Kramer has until May 11 to file pretrial motions. Federal prosecutors were given to July 13 to respond, and Howell asked both parties to return to court on Sept. 5 for oral arguments on the motions.
Kramer told the judge he could be ready to start trial on Oct. 1, but Howell said she preferred to hear the pretrial motions before setting a date.
Hampton was Ensign's longtime close friend and Senate administrative assistant, but their friendship and professional relationship disintegrated after Hampton in late 2007 learned Ensign was having an affair with his wife.
To cushion the financial blow after Hampton left Ensign's staff on May 1, 2008, Ensign lined up Nevada lobbying clients for him. Hampton is charged with violating a federal law that requires top Senate aides to refrain from lobbying senators for a year after leaving Capitol Hill.
Ensign, once a Republican rising star, resigned last May, days before the Senate Ethics Committee released a report that found evidence he may have committed conspiracy, made false statements and destroyed potential evidence in trying to cover up the affair.
In court on Friday, Kramer said it has been a "massive undertaking" to review material gathered by the Senate panel and by the Justice Department that conducted a separate probe.
The Justice Department told Ensign attorneys in December 2010 that it had completed an investigation and was not pursuing charges against him.
Following the more recent Senate ethics disclosures, there have been no public signs that the department has reopened the matter, said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a watchdog group.
Sloan, a former federal prosecutor, attended the Hampton session on Friday as an observer.
With attorneys focused on pretrial matters, Sloan said she found no clues that Hampton may be cooperating in any further investigations or that a deal may be in the works on the charges against him.
Hampton faces a maximum five years in prison and $250,000 fine on each of the seven counts on which he was indicted.
"The biggest thing we saw today is they are definitely moving forward with the Hampton case in a way that does not indicate cooperation in an Ensign case," Sloan said.
In Nevada, Ensign has kept a private profile since leaving the Senate.
Still living in the Las Vegas Valley, he recently renewed his license to practice as a veterinarian, his profession before entering Congress in 1995.
Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephens media.com or 202-783-1760.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Little Miss.Snippy, I will choose to ignore your utterly foolish nickname so that I can tell you how much I appreciate your wonderfully enriching comment. Your fashion critiques are clearly very useful and since fashion is so extremely pertinent to this country's legal system, I applaud your insistence on getting to the bottom of the issues. You really are a talented legal and intellectual mind.
Doug, the goatee is quite becoming on you. Really, it is. But that tie has got to go. And you could get a better coat from the Salvation Army. The lawyer's wife doesn't much better taste either.
Msed had better hope she doesn't get hoof and [in?] mouth disease and need the services of Mr Ensign!
Both Hampton and Ensign are Bottom Dwellers. They each embody AND exemplify the Worst of the Worst in our "bought $$$$ sold" political system.
He should have done a Hillary and used the thing as leverage for whatever he wanted.
Instead he was bitter and his emotions got the best of him and open his mouth about everything.
It is hard but Hillary did the wise thing (perhaps not the right thing but the wise thing).
Let me guess Mrs Hampton is just a victim in all this.
WAIT UNTIL THEY DIE AND THEN SCHEDULE THE CASE. JUST SHOWS HOW BAD THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN THIS COUNTRY WORKS. FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER ? FROM KING TO PEASANT WAS HIS OWN DOING. WITH A LOTTA HELP FROM HIS WIFE AND JOHN THE MORALESS.
Even though NRS 638.1 2a states veternarians should be of good moral character, John Ensign's license was renewed. This is a travisty of justice. Hampton is a fall guy.