JOHN L. SMITH: Homeowners whose mortgages fizzled fight back with class-action lawsuit - News

PRINT THIS Popular

Oct. 13, 2009
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

JOHN L. SMITH: Homeowners whose mortgages fizzled fight back with class-action lawsuit

JOHN L. SMITH
MORE COLUMNS

Discuss this column in the eForums!

Housing in Southern Nevada

When Luis Armando Benito purchased the home on Cherry Canyon Avenue in October 2004, the Las Vegas real estate market was still skyrocketing toward the stratosphere.

The four-bedroom, two-bath home's $475,000 price was high, but Benito was able to secure an adjustable rate mortgage with surprising ease from Indymac Bank. It appeared his dream of home ownership had become a reality.

Most Popular Stories

Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer

FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade

NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges

NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch

Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss

DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family

Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty

Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop

UNLV sacks football coach Sanford

NORM: CityCenter seeks presidential visit

A few months later, Benito was aroused from his reverie. It's a story that's become hauntingly familiar in a state that leads the nation in home foreclosure. When Benito's ARM came due and his interest rate went up, his mortgage payment doubled.

He didn't give up without a fight. He swore he hadn't been made aware of the potential danger of taking out an ARM. He spent hours on the phone attempting to get help from the mortgage company. He wasted money on a company claiming to be able to negotiate with the bank.

Making Benito's efforts infinitely more difficult was the fact Indymac was closed by the Office of the Thrift Supervision on July 11, 2008. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was appointed receiver. (Indymac's loans are now serviced by Indymac Mortgage Services, a division of OneWest Bank.)

His dream became a nightmare, and his home was foreclosed on through a trust deed of sale in November 2008. A month later, the home was re-sold for $265,451. Although Benito tried to fight the foreclosure, he was evicted in late May.

Today, Benito and other locals with Indymac mortgages are fighting back -- and making progress. They have joined a federal class-action lawsuit against Indymac Mortgage brought by attorneys Matthew Callister and Brooke Bohlke. Their clients' homes range in value from $150,000 to more than $1 million.

Among many allegations, the attorneys contend OneWest "breached the loan agreements/contracts by failing to disclose the following: APR, method of determining the finance charge, balance, actual finance charge, total payments, amount financed, number of payments, and due dates. OneWest breached the loan agreements/contracts by doubling Plaintiffs mortgage payments when the mortgage 'arms' came due."

Although they come from vastly different backgrounds, the homeowners share a common story of how creatively they were qualified for their loans. Some of the loan documents contained more fiction than a Stephen King novel.

One homeowner who earned $160,000 a year saw that figure placed in the gross "earnings-per-month" category. Another with a job paying $16 per hour somehow managed to qualify for a $380,000 house.

Most were buried after their ARM doubled their monthly payment.

When they sought to renegotiate their loans, according to the complaint, they were met with a wall of indifference. When the company went into receivership and changed hands, it was nearly impossible to find someone in authority to take a call.

"This explains why no one can get through on the phones," Callister says.

The multibillion-dollar federal bailout of the mortgage industry compels banks to negotiate with homeowners and modify loans. Callister says, "If you take federal bank bailout funds, you must participate in the mortgage modification program."

Problem is, those Troubled Asset Relief Program checks cleared long before the banks were prepared to renegotiate thousands of home loans. And no one in authority in Washington stopped the clock as people lost their homes across the country. There simply hasn't been enough pressure from Washington to ensure a speedy process. The longer mortgage companies delay renegotiating, the more homeowners get buried.

At least in this case, some Southern Nevada homeowners refuse to be steamrolled.

In September, U.S. District Judge Philip Pro signed a stipulation extending the preliminary discovery process another 90 days. Indymac/OneWest will have until Jan. 15 to reply. Meanwhile, all action against the more than two-dozen homeowners battling it out with a mortgage giant is frozen.

The list of homeowners taking action grows as they learn about the lawsuit.

"Somebody's got to bite the bullet and say, 'We're going to freeze foreclosures on single family homes,'" Callister says. "If it takes the court system's intervention, then so be it."

Once a troubled Indymac borrower learns of the lawsuit, Bohlke says, "We've been able to stop foreclosures with 24 hours' notice."

With about 1,000 Indymac mortgage loans heading into default in Southern Nevada alone, the phones at the law office figure to keep ringing for some time to come.

John L. Smith's column appears Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. E-mail him at Smith@reviewjournal.com or call (702) 383-0295. He also blogs at lvrj.com/blogs/smith.

Share & Save

Leave Your Comment	67 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor. Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Please enter your name Name: Please enter your email Email: Please enter a comment COMMENTS : (word count limit is 300) You have reached the maximum number of words allowed Current Word Count: Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background. perry wrote on October 15, 2009 04:34 AM: i am one of the customer mr calliter my hours are being cut back i am afraid my work wil not last b 4 year end Dick and Dottie wrote on October 14, 2009 03:44 PM: John,Thanks for the article on Homeowners mortgages. Moving back to LV from Palm Desert.Keep up the ongoing informative information. Looking forward to reading more. All the best to you and your family. D&D Hey WOW wrote on October 13, 2009 07:38 PM: Democrat then creates Mortgage Mediation Squatting Bliss wrote on October 13, 2009 07:37 PM: Boyd Student- seems the lawsuit, like many others, are allowing many to SQUAT. How many of the class do you think are paying their mortgage? I suspect many of the class are those who received 100% ltv motgages, and had nothing to lose. To Superduper wrote on October 13, 2009 06:17 PM: Dearest Luv Superduper, I am a proud Liberal. I do have a Mental Deficiency Problem because I read what you said. Put it where the SUN DOESN"T SHINE, ese. Pooh-Pooh-You Luv and Kisses John Ensign (panty LUVER) Mom...Dad can I borrow $96,000.00? Pay you back from my Newspaper Route. Boyd Student wrote on October 13, 2009 03:45 PM: There is a much bigger class action in front of Federal Judge Ed Reed that was filed last year in Reno, Nv. on behalf of several plaintiffs against all the top lending institutions, loan servicers and MERS along with several other companion cases that are much more far reaching and deadly to not only the defendants' rights to foreclose but also whether the mortgages themselves are void under several legal concerns. Discovery has already been scheduled in which the heads of MERS, GMAC and several others will be taken beginning this month. Among the questions that will be asked is how the TARP, TALF and other Bailout funds that totaled more than 11 Trillion in tax payers' funds have been spent. These are questions congress cannot even ask yet thanks to the lawsuit mentioned we are able to find out how the money was spent, especially considering based on the lenders' own statements there are only between 700 million and 1.8 trillion dollars in troubled assets (bad home loans like those in NV and the other 28 states and the District of Columbia that are part of the Reed class action and nationwide on its way). Federal Magistrate Leen of the Federal Court here in NV has along with Magistrate Cook out of Reno have already ruled that discovery and depositions will begin this month. Where was the Vegas Media? This is the biggest case of fraud in the history of the monetary world. The firm involved is Hager & Hearne and the case effects everyone who is either a home owner or is or will ever be a tax payer. Hand me the keys...Anybody? wrote on October 13, 2009 03:40 PM: Dear WOW, WOW indeed. Against certain kinds of ignorance the gods themselves labor in vain... Case in point: December 15th, 2000: McCain and REPUBLICANS stall until 5:30PM and effectively deregulate BOTH the securities and mortgage industries. Then they go home for Christmas dinner. It's all been downhill since. Show us the homeowners identified as Democrats in this article. Or Reasonable numbers that show Dem homeowners in the majority in the mortgage crisis. Otherwise, as the Republicans in this blogosphere are fond of saying, "Case Closed"... John Ensign wrote on October 13, 2009 03:36 PM: Democrats must take responsibility for their bad decisions. My mom and dad said so. superpooper wrote on October 13, 2009 03:30 PM: Where does it say that the subject is a democrat? Superduper wrote on October 13, 2009 03:26 PM: Do democrats ever take responsibility when they fail to pay their bills because of their own bad planning? Liberalism is a mental disorder Read All Comments