Comments (15) | Add a comment
HUD explains rebuff
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Updated: Apr. 10, 2012 | 10:38 a.m.
A day after Southern Nevada lost out on a $367 million federal grant to help address the area's foreclosure crisis, local officials got an explanation for the denial from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman, who was among a dozen valley leaders at a meeting Friday in Las Vegas with HUD representatives, said agency officials felt the region requested too much of the $2 billion in grant money available to the entire nation for neighborhood stabilization.
"They believed we had a need, but not the capacity to spend that kind of money in the (four-year) period allotted," Goodman said.
It appears HUD did not award partial grants to any areas.
On Thursday, Southern Nevada, which has one of the highest foreclosure rates in the nation, was denied funding in the second phase of HUD's Neighborhood Stabilization Program, which is aimed at helping to place families in vacant, bank-owned homes.
Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., said Friday she shared her frustration over the decision with HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan in Washington.
"I am pleased that the Secretary heard me out, and after our conversation, I know he is very aware of the situation we face in Southern Nevada," Berkley said in a written statement. "He indicated to me it was his understanding that Southern Nevada faced difficulties in utilizing resources that have already been allocated."
The first part of the Neighborhood Stabilization Program, a $4 billion initiative, brought about $60 million to Southern Nevada. The use of that money did not have a direct impact on the decision to deny the region second-round funding, HUD officials said.
HUD received 482 grant applications, requesting a total of $15 billion, which required the agency to assess an area's overall capacity to utilize funds.
That is where Southern Nevada got hurt, said Kenny Young, a North Las Vegas housing official who also attended Friday's meeting in Las Vegas.
"We were told other areas had the ability to leverage (grant money) with nonprofit and private industry resources," Young said. "Some areas even had money to pony up out of general funds to take on mortgages. We didn't have the capacity to do that."
Young said Southern Nevada could appeal HUD's decision, but he doubted that would do much good.
Goodman said the region's top priority now should be looking at how other federal money could be used to prevent foreclosures from happening in the first place.
Contact reporter Alan Maimon at amaimon@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0404.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
This is just a set up for Harry to come riding to the rescue before the election to get his poll numbers back up. Watch what happens in the next 6 months. Politics as usual.
What did we do that upset Obama?
First, the no junkets to Las Vegas last February, and now no HUD money for us?
Harry, did he kiss you on the mouth, recently?
"agency officials felt the region [had a need but] requested too much of the $2 billion in grant money available"
And you want the government to run health care?
Pa-leeze
HUD knew that EVERY SINGLE DOLLAR allocated to Clark County would be diverted to the Reid Family and used to buy Rory a Governor's job.
What's the big deal?