Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


Judge rejects settlement in lawsuit over hepatitis C







A judge Tuesday rejected a proposed settlement between Dr. Dipak Desai and a former patient who contracted hepatitis C under his care.

District Judge David Wall said his decision was based on vague language regarding some issues in the settlement, and not Desai's objection to the confidential settlement that was reached on his behalf by his medical malpractice insurer.


Most Popular Stories
  • Obama dings Las Vegas — again
  • Obama dings Las Vegas — again
  • 'YOU DON'T BLOW A BUNCH OF CASH IN VEGAS ...': Obama remark reopens wound
  • LAUGHLIN EDGEWATER: Two dead in casino car crash
  • NORM: Ad's Strip scenes raised eyebrows
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Former commander of USS Cole considers run against Reid
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • NORM: $1 million wager on Super Bowl approved
  • IMAGES FROM 1860S: Photos show historic Nevada
  • Fighter battles rare disease that shatters mixed martial arts dream




  • The judge said the language issues could be resolved.

    Lawyers for the patient, Michael Washington, and his wife said they would rewrite the settlement to satisfy the judge's concerns. Failing that, they would proceed with the lawsuit against Desai, who is being sued along with his clinics and the drug companies that made the anesthetic at the heart of the hepatitis C outbreak.

    The amount of the settlement was sealed, but lawyers representing patients in other cases said the amount was likely no more than $350,000 plus costs for future medical treatment, which is the state's legal cap for damages in medical malpractice cases.

    If a rewritten settlement is approved, the case would continue against the drug manufacturers, including Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc. and Baxter Healthcare Corp., under a defective product claim.

    Desai and the other medical professionals who helped perform Washington's colonoscopy would likely be released from the lawsuit, since state law limits malpractice payouts to the $350,000 total no matter how many people were involved.

    During Tuesday morning's hearing, the Washingtons' lawyers argued that the settlement would allow the retired couple to move on with their lives after more than a year and a half of litigation.

    Ed Bernstein applauded Desai's insurer, Nevada Mutual Insurance Co., for being the only party willing to resolve the case.

    "Everybody else has tried to delay or postpone this," he said.

    Lawyers for the drug makers objected to the settlement, as did Desai's personal lawyer, who said the doctor never approved it.

    "My client, the insured, is in the dark," Joshua Dickey said. "A settlement was reached and we had no knowledge of it whatsoever."

    Washington's lawyers argued that Desai's disagreement with his insurance company was a contractual issue that should have no bearing on the proposed settlement.

    Wall agreed, saying that issue was better left to "a different forum."

    Washington, who has diabetes, is among nine former patients whose hepatitis infections were genetically linked by health officials to the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada or Desai's other two Las Vegas clinics.

    His lawsuit was to be the first among dozens to go to trial this week, but the trial has been postponed until May.

    About 300 former patients have sued Desai, his fellow doctors and his clinics, claiming they contracted hepatitis or other blood-borne diseases after undergoing colonoscopies or other procedures.

    Public health investigators blamed the hepatitis outbreak on nurse anesthetists reusing single-dose medicine vials among patients. The vials, they said, became contaminated when nurses used a syringe more than once on the same patient.

    Contact reporter Brian Haynes at bhaynes@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0281.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    pat wrote on October 28, 2009 12:35 PM: You come on got to be kidding me.. So, I say quit it and grow up take responsibility for your actions and quit being greedy. Remember what you do in this life will determine your fate before you pass away. (Karma will always come back at the people who have done you wrong and it comes back three times bad)


    Pat wrote on October 28, 2009 12:34 PM: Did it ever occur to the public and to our justice system that all this bickering over a small amount of money awarded? It is so small it does even being to cover the cost of treatment, life time monitoring, shorted life span by being infected and the lifetime of pain and suffering something that the clinic, staff and doctors inflected onto these people. These people will have for the rest of their life. If they get awarded anything after the court cost, attorney fees, investigation fee’s and expert doctors findings. How much does that really leave these people? I came to this conclusion really it will only be about 50,000 to 75,000 left for these people who got infected and will be for the rest of their life. Really is this what we have come to everyone wins except the infected person. It was proven by the SNHD and CDC that there were unsafe. Is our justice system failing us? That they are conveying is we can go out commit a crime to over 40,000 people and just file bankruptcy and get away Scott free. Our health care system has failed us and our justice system. Who is the victim the people who went to the clinic or the clinic, staff, doctor’s, health insurance companies, medical company, our city and state regulators who are supposed to stop these practices? Justice is sending out a message that the people who went to the clinic are not the victims and have not rights. But the following people and companies have I have mentioned have rights and they are the victims. Was anyone concerned when these people went to the clinic that there rights were being violated. What about the rights for the infected people have we forgot about


    pat wrote on October 28, 2009 09:47 AM: no one will give these people health insurance now. Who is going to take care of that with only a 350 cap that won't cover insurance. if awarded anything they won't see that much after everyone gets there cut of the money award. The person may only see 75,000 after this and that is not enough to cover them for the rest of there life.