Comments (17) | Add a comment
Judge's ruling halts North Las Vegas special election
-
K.M. Cannon/Las Vegas Review-Journal
North Las Vegas Mayor Shari Buck recuses herself last month from a council discussion of a revote in the disputed election where Councilman Richard Cherchio, left, lost to dentist Wade Wagner by a single vote. Cherchio was relieved of his duties on July 1, leaving a four-person council to oversee the city until the election dispute is resolved. » Buy this photo
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
A District Court judge ruled Friday that North Las Vegas must certify a City Council race decided by one vote and it can't hold a special election to resolve questions about an ineligible voter who might have participated in the June 7 contest.
Wade Wagner, a Republican, defeated incumbent Councilman Richard Cherchio, a Democrat, by a single vote for the Ward 4 seat in the nonpartisan election.
The council later decided to redo the election on July 19 in one precinct and allow all registered voters to take part, even if they didn't cast ballots in the first race.
Wagner's attorney, Todd Bice, said the judge's ruling nullifies an improper action by the council.
He accused the council of trying to skew the outcome by picking a heavily Democratic precinct and not limiting participation to those who had voted before.
"I think it was election manipulating," Bice said.
Councilwoman Anita Wood called the judge's decision frustrating but said the council now has no choice but to canvass the election.
Because an ineligible vote may have been cast in the race, Wood said she is still troubled by certifying the results.
State law requires a government to deal with clerical errors discovered during an election to ensure the outcome reflects "the true vote cast," she said.
"I don't know what the true result was, so how can I canvass it?" Wood said. "So I sent it back to the voters to give me clear direction."
Wagner won the race with 1,831 votes versus Cherchio's 1,830.
Cherchio, who was appointed in 2009, was relieved of his duties on July 1, leaving a four-person council to oversee the city until the dispute is resolved.
Cherchio said Judge Elizabeth Gonzales' decision was against the city and not against him or his campaign. That leaves him free to request a recount and seek other remedies after the results are canvassed, he said.
"We haven't begun our campaign yet to get a new election," Cherchio said, adding that he will "exercise every option that's out there" in challenging an election with a one-vote margin.
Using special elections to resolve ballot discrepancies is nothing new, he said, noting that North Las Vegas held one in 1999 for that purpose.
The 1999 do-over was intended to fix two mistakes made in a primary race in which two votes separated a candidate who would make it to the general election and one who would be eliminated, said Larry Lomax, Clark County's registrar of voters.
It had a key difference from the one the council recently proposed: Participation was limited to people who had voted in the first contest, Lomax said.
This time, council members opted for a special election in precinct 4306, where an ineligible voter participated. The voter moved from Ward 3 to 4 and failed to update his registration, Lomax said.
Because ballots are secret, it is unknown whether the ineligible person actually voted for a councilman, Lomax said. Two people in that precinct voted in the judge's contest but not the council race, he added.
If the council had gotten its wish, 1,248 registered voters would have been free to cast ballots, compared with the 112 who participated in June, Lomax said.
Lomax said Bice is correct about the precinct being deeply blue, with 808 registered Democrats, 211 Republicans and 220 who belong to other parties.
But then, Ward 4 as a whole tilts that way, with 11,900 Democrats versus 6,200 Republicans and 4,600 affiliated with other parties, he said.
The contest between Cherchio and Wagner was overshadowed by the war between Cherchio and the city's police and unions. The unions campaigned zealously against him because he voted for cuts in public safety staffing to save money in the cash-strapped city.
North Las Vegas is wrestling with a $30.3 million shortfall in fiscal 2012 and last month adopted a budget in which more than 250 jobs were slashed, including those of roughly 35 firefighters and a dozen police officers.
Both sides agree there are more skirmishes to come.
"Unfortunately it sounds like this is not going to be the last effort," Bice said.
Review-Journal writer Lynnette Curtis contributed to this report. Contact reporter Scott Wyland at swyland@reviewjournal.com or 702-455-4519.
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
They should handle it the vegas way, cut cards and high card is the winner.
One thing I"m pretty sure that if this voter was hispanic that thier name would be here and that someone would be yelling voter fraud
Hopefully these councilors realize the Police are bringing the corruption of NLV politics to an end! I have a feeling Wood, Eliason, and AMR will be brought up on charges after all of this!
They obviously know who the voter was that voted improperly. Get them to say who they voted for... It would either be a two vote win if they voted for Cherchio or a tie if they voted for Wagner. If it s a tie treat it as such and if Cherchio lost by two votes then tough cookies.... It sure would save a lot of hassle and taxpayer expense.
Wagner wins by one vote. The council members that donated money and endorsed Cherchio, voted for a reelection. NEVER SHOCKED! Look who doesn't like a pink slip. Welcome to the real world Mr. Cherchio
One really sad thing is that so many people didn't exercise their right to vote in the first place. And of course another sad thing is the way the POA acted with their smear campaign; but it worked, they have (for now) halted pink-slips for their members. Now the "great ones" (at least in their own minds) - the police - rule and the "other" ones, non-police, will face an even more lopsided percentage of layoffs. And for now the POA members can meet, while on duty on paid lunch hours (with free coffee and half-off meals), and plot their next raises and additional benefits - with the mayor backing them of course.
Apathy is the problem with the system. They say every vote counts. This election sure does make that point.
I don't think it is possible to make any voter fraud accusations because over 80% of the voters in the Ward opted to IGNORE the election entirely. Guess that majority is too important or too busy to take the time and perform their civic duty and vote!
About the only thing Councilwoman Wood should regret is that she obviously doesn't have a clue what her job is! I seem to remember there was a card draw for second place in the Primary Election in Ward 2 due to a tie. Losing one vote from Wagner would create a card draw. Wagner gaining a vote is a two vote victory. Guess Councilwoman Wood forgot about what happened in her city four months ago?
There is one word for such close elections: FRAUD!
While it is possible that half of a population could vote equally against the other half, such outcomes are extremely rare and the number of close elections in the United States are improbable such as the case here.
Hate to say it, the idiot that voted wrong just loses his vote. Pay attention and make sure you follow directions. Similar to the "cross cut ballot" in the 04 election. Let me have this guys lottery tickets, since he can't read numbers hahaha
Let's waste some more time money and resources! With the current state of the economy, what do we have to worry about?