Comments (1) | Add a comment
Lawsuit advances on appeal
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL CAPITAL BUREAU
Updated: Apr. 10, 2012 | 9:45 a.m.
CARSON CITY -- The Nevada Supreme Court unanimously upheld a lower court decision Thursday that members of a Clark County family may bring a malpractice lawsuit against Valley Hospital, though their missing lawyer previously settled the case on their behalf.
The court found that the lawyer, Lawrence Davidson, committed a fraud on the court, the hospital and the Garner family when he took off with the $160,000 that he had obtained from the hospital.
Hospital officials had wanted the court to rule the case was completed and the Garners were not entitled to file a new malpractice lawsuit.
Davidson forged the signatures of Clark Garner and three other family members who had sued the hospital for malpractice over the death of Bobby Garner in 1998 at age 69, according to court documents.
The lawsuit contended that he died after he was not reconnected to cardiac telemetry equipment after undergoing an MRI at the hospital.
The lawyer has been missing since the end of 2005, and warrants are out for his arrest.
In the decision, Justice Kris Pickering said the family still may bring its malpractice case against Valley, but any final settlement amount must be reduced by the $160,000 the hospital paid.
In other words, if the family receives $1 million, then that amount must be reduced by $160,000.
The decision upholds a ruling made by District Judge Mark Denton.
Davidson fled before he was scheduled to go to trial in October 2006 in federal court on mail fraud and money laundering charges.
He could have been sentenced to 50 years in prison on those charges.
In a November 2005 indictment, he was charged with fraudulently settling 17 cases on behalf of clients, putting their $936,000 in his bank account and then withdrawing the money for his personal use.
Davidson has been disbarred.
His father, developer Donald Davidson, received a two-year prison sentence last year in wake of charges he tried to bribe former City Councilman Michael McDonald in 2002. The son also faced trial on bribery charges.
In the decision, Pickering said Lawrence Davidson victimized not only the hospital, but also the Garners, who had no knowledge that he had settled the case by forging their signatures.
Pickering also said Lawrence Davidson "committed a fraud upon the court when he signed and submitted a stipulated judgment" that a judge signed and entered, terminating the Garners' claims.
"'Fraud upon the court' has been recognized for centuries as a basis for setting aside a final judgment, sometimes even years after it was entered," Pickering wrote in the decision.
As a lawyer, Pickering noted, Davidson was considered an "officer of the court," and "a lawyer's criminal conduct should permit a claim to relief from judgment by a victimized client as well."
To make signatures of the Garner heirs appear authentic, Pickering noted, Davison stole a notary stamp from a neighboring office and forged the notary's signature.
Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
State Bar of Nevada Governor England testified before State of Nevada Supreme Court, September 2009, that she knows of no problems (regarding issues of personal behaviors) of State of Nevada attorneys.
Why didn't NV Supreme Court Judge Kris Pickering correct the record?
Also, sitting at this hearing was Justice Hardesty. Why didn't he correct the record. Justice Hardesty recommended Attorney Charles Hoskin to the bench even though Attorney Hoskin has an ongoing public record of perpetrating fraud upon the court?
Additionally, Justice Hardesty attended a hearing, February 2009, with Eighth Judicial District Chief Judge Ritchie in which testimony was given to the problems with Odyssey and Blackstone.
We anticipate by February 2010, the crimes resulting from the neglect and fraud of the Nevada State Bar and Nevada Supreme Court will escalate. That date is when Chief Judge Ritchie demands e-filing, a system riddled with errors.
We recommend Chief Justice Hardesty sit down with alleged murder target Judge Weller and begin to uncover the problems in the State of Nevada Judiciary. YOUR RIGHT!