News

Lawsuit claims BLM approval violated laws

Loading the player...
By Keith Rogers
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Posted: Jan. 25, 2011 | 6:07 p.m.
Updated: Jan. 26, 2011 | 8:03 a.m.

A federal lawsuit filed Tuesday in Las Vegas claims the Bureau of Land Management violated federal environmental and American Indian cultural laws when the agency approved a wind energy project near Great Basin National Park.

The 36-page complaint states that despite "very significant and unknown environmental and cultural impacts," the BLM gave "fast track" approval of the Spring Valley Wind project in White Pine County four miles from a cave where more than 1 million Mexican free-tailed bats roost in the fall, and near the sacred Western Shoshone swamp cedar site where Indians were massacred during the Goshute War of 1863.

"BLM refused to conduct the full environmental analysis required by the National Environmental Policy Act. Instead, under pressure from high-level BLM officials and the industry proponent, BLM rushed through a short-cut analysis in order to meet arbitrary funding deadlines desired by the industry," according to the lawsuit filed by attorneys for the Center for Biological Diversity, the Western Watershed Project, the Ely Shoshone Tribe, the Duckwater Shoshone Tribe and the Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation.

The lawsuit seeks to block the BLM from allowing Spring Valley Wind to go forward with "ground-clearing, site preparation and wind tower construction until such time as BLM has fully complied with law."

In addition, the plaintiffs ask the U.S. District Court to strike BLM's Oct. 15 decision to approve the 75-turbine Spring Valley Wind project on public land northwest of Great Basin National Park.

Rob Mrowka, an ecologist with the Center for Biological Diversity, said that while renewable energy is globally important for addressing threats of climate change, such projects "must be properly located with careful consideration of the values of not only the site but also of the surrounding area."

The lawsuit claims the project's "industrial sprawl would likewise impair many other on-site and migratory native wildlife species including greater sage grouse and raptors."

A spokeswoman for the BLM's state office in Reno who was sent a copy of the complaint said the BLM can't comment on litigation.

George Hardie, project manager for Pattern Energy, the parent company of Spring Valley Wind, said in an e-mail, however, that he is disappointed the lawsuit was filed but confident it will be dismissed because in his view, "if the Spring Valley project is not environmentally acceptable, then no project in Nevada will ever be acceptable."

"Pattern Energy and the BLM have worked extremely hard to make the Spring Valley wind project as environmentally benign as possible," Hardie wrote in the e-mail.

He said the project "has put in place the most extensive and forward looking mitigation and adaptive management plan ever devised for any wind energy project in the United States to minimize the impact to wildlife and the environment. In fact, our mitigation and adaptive management plans for bats, sage grouse and other avian species were all designed with the full input and ultimate concurrence of both the Nevada Department of Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service."

Biologists think as many as 3 million Mexican free-tailed bats roost for one to three days in Rose Cave across from the planned wind farm during their southern migration. Because of the location, they fear that many of the 2,000 bats per minute that leave the cave might either collide with wind turbines, or suffer from deadly "barotrauma," the rapid expansion of an animal's lungs from a sudden change in barometric pressure at the trailing edge of a rotor blade.

Meanwhile, they are trying to use "Star Wars" technology, such as thermal imaging scopes, infrared optics and marine-grade radar to keep bats from tangling with wind turbines by detecting when they leave the cave and triggering a slow-down of turbine blades if they approach them.

The lawsuit notes that the project was approved over concerns from the National Park Service and biologists from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Nevada Department of Wildlife.

Contact reporter Keith Rogers at krogers@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0308.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. sandcanyongal Jul. 1, 2011 | 9:35 p.m. Report Abuse

    Hi there. I use this link often as a classic example of BLM and energy companies being sued for attempting to destroy our lands for behemoth energy projects, transmission line and the rest of the infrastructure to keep building more cities. This is insane!

    Our ocean is dying because of their 20th century mentality. Now a new cast of characters like BP, GE and LA DWP and Edison think they can march through our wild lands like they're still doing business in the '80s. It's over. We're already in the 2nd decade of this century, we all know better than to ignore climate change. Energy isn't green when this old school mentality still thinks it's ok to kill our ocean food supply and and land animals just for profit. This is the decade we force our species to evolve from selfish monkeys to sustainable humanoids. We either evolve or take the way of the dinasaurs.

    Thank you for the inspiration you give. me to fight.

  2. henry.haug Feb. 22, 2011 | 11:07 a.m. Report Abuse

    I am sure that Mr. Mrowka only uses electricity that he makes himsell .nor does he consume petroleum products in his quest to stop all energy producing endeavors. Do I have to worry that he will be picketting my wind generator? Do i have to guard my solar panels so that a raven will not be blinded while flying by? Like all so called enviromentalists, he proposes no alternative. Not here and not over there either.

  3. Norm Vaxton Jan. 26, 2011 | 2:50 p.m. Report Abuse

    Odummer stated in his address last night that he expects 80 percent of our energy to come from renewables in the near future. Typical clueless liberal politician. And how exactly does he propose to get it done with all this permit nonsense?

  4. Steven R. Jan. 25, 2011 | 8:36 p.m. Report Abuse

    Rob Mrowka is trying to save every single thing that crawls, slithers, or flys I see.

    The Center for Biological Diversity seems to be out to remove humans from the equation.

    Let Mwroka go live in a cave with no electricity.

  5. NV Resident Jan. 25, 2011 | 8:32 p.m. Report Abuse

    This is one of the reasons why we are having such a hard time bringing alternative energy projects and jobs to the area. There have been a number of attempts with viable international investment interest for solar and geothermal that fell through because either the BLM delays beyond a reasonable time line or some conservation group see this as threatening to the environment. If we continue to spew CO2 from carbon-based fuels into the air these animals and plants will slowly die off anyway along with the people fighting this.

    They want us to move it to another location but then they will fight the right away access for the power lines to bring the generated power to the grid.

  6. Franklin Jan. 25, 2011 | 7:21 p.m. Report Abuse

    Another NIMBY issue. Everyone wants to save the world but noone will do the dishes (P.J. O'Rourke).

Friday, May 25, 2012
Overcast Overcast, 73° Weather Forecast