Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - News

Friday
Mar 12, 2010
Clear
Clear 43° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


Las Vegas officer wounds suspect

Witness says man was shot in the back running away from traffic stop

A motorcycle officer shot a man in the back after he fled during a traffic stop Thursday afternoon, said a woman who witnessed the shooting.

Las Vegas police said the man was trying to pull out a gun or a knife as he was running from the officer.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Goodman says city should fire all workers
  2. Reid's wife, daughter hospitalized after accident
  3. Eight-car accident causes delays in Lake Mead-Nellis area
  4. School Board dismisses critics
  5. Cop sitcom eyes Las Vegas actors
  6. Rulffes says layoffs likely
  7. Boulder City constable arrested on felony charges
  8. Gibbons rejects four-day work week
  9. 'Lost Boys' actor Corey Haim dead at 38
  10. Calif. boy who called 911 thanks dispatcher




Brandi Burks, 19, said she was standing outside her apartment complex on Cheyenne Avenue, west of the Michael Way intersection, when the shooting happened.

Motorcycle officers had been patrolling the street heavily on Thursday, pulling over speeders, Burks said.

Capt. Randy Montandon said a patrol officer saw a man driving a silver Pontiac rental car make an illegal turn at Cheyenne Avenue and Jones Boulevard about 2:24 p.m. The officer then witnessed the driver make several illegal lane changes, Montandon said.

Montandon said the officer pulled the man over on Cheyenne near Michael Way. The situation escalated when the officer did a records check on the man and discovered he was the subject of an outstanding warrant for misdemeanor violations.

Burks said she saw the incident unfold. The motorcycle officer stopped the man's vehicle on the far right lane of eastbound Cheyenne, just before Michael Way.

The officer asked the driver to step out of the vehicle. The man stepped out and began running in a northwest direction across Cheyenne. The officer told the man to halt, she said, but the man kept running.

"You could tell he was scared," she said.

As the man was running, he kept grabbing his pants, as if to hold them up, Burks said. She did not see a gun, and did not see the officer fire a Taser.

She saw the officer fire his gun at the man when he reached the sidewalk. The man went down, and officers handcuffed him.

"They shot him in the back," she said. "He was just running."

Montandon said the suspect became combative when the officer asked him to get out of his car. A struggle ensued, Montandon said.

The suspect fled west on Cheyenne. The officer unsuccessfully tried to stop him with a Taser.

"As the officer was chasing the individual giving him orders to stop, the individual reached into his pants pocket, front right, and retrieved what appears to be a .45-caliber handgun," Montandon said.

The officer then fired multiple shots to the suspect's torso and arm. Montandon said the suspect was taken to University Medical Center and is expected to survive.

Montandon also said the officer saw the suspect attempt to pull out a "large folding knife."

Montandon said the suspect is white and in his late 30s or early 40s.

Police did not release the suspect's name, which they were attempting to verify Thursday night. Montandon said the officer used his handgun as a last resort.

"The officer used verbal commands" to persuade the individual to surrender, Montandon said. "He then went to a nonlethal option, using a Taser."

Montandon said he is not sure why the Taser didn't stop the suspect. The prongs might have fallen off the suspect's body as he fled, he said.

The name of the officer who shot the suspect will be released 48 hours after the incident, as per department policy. The officer will be placed on routine paid administrative leave.

Police Thursday night could not respond to the details of Burks' account.

Las Vegas police spokesman Jacinto Rivera said the department's use of force policy is based on court cases that have established three standards for justification of use of force: the severity of the crime, whether the suspect is a threat to the officer or others and whether the suspect is actively resisting arrest or attempting to avoid arrest by fleeing.

Thursday's shooting and the witness account of it have similarities to the fatal July shooting of 32-year-old John Paul Hambleton. Hambleton fled two Las Vegas police detectives after they tried to arrest him on nine counts of sexual assault with a minor.

After firing a Taser unsuccessfully, engaging in a foot chase and becoming involved in a brief scuffle, officers said, Hambleton grabbed a detective's Taser and pointed it at him. Hambleton was about 10 feet away when a detective shot him in the back.

A Clark County coroner's inquest jury ruled that the shooting was justified.

Burks said Thursday night that she told officers at the scene that she had witnessed the shooting, but they ignored her.

Rivera said officers would like to talk to Burks and any other witnesses about what happened. He encouraged them to call the department's homicide section at 828-3521.

According to the Metropolitan Police Department's Web site, Thursday's shooting was the 16th officer-involved shooting this year, up from 14 in 2008.

Contact reporter Lawrence Mower at lmower@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0440. Contact reporter Antonio Planas at aplanas@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-4638.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 252 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

Ella wrote on November 05, 2009 05:44 AM: METRO MUST BE REIGNED IN! Shot for a HOV violation. ABSURD.
Speeding, shooting at the slightest provocation whether it's appropriate or not. This is not a police department it's the wild, wild, west, and the Sheriff must take action NOW to get these cowboys under control.


Report abuse

Vagan for 40 years wrote on November 03, 2009 04:47 PM: There is no excuse to shoot an individual who is running from a police officer. It's time that the police keep up their physical training like they were required in their boot camp. Every year the officers should meet a height and weight standard, should be able to run a mile in less than 6 minutes and should be able to qualify a with all of the weaponry that they are required to carry. I see the graduating classes of new cadets, and then I observe the officers later on TV in the process of doing their jobs and most of them up here to be morbidly obese. No wonder it is easier for them to shoot some one, then it is to engage in a foot chase. There is no excuse to shoot and individual unless they are the fleeing felon who is a danger to society. I am really tired from the Air Force and twice a year we were required to demonstrate our capabilities both physically and mentally and wore occasionally tested in real life situations. Those who could not maintain their physical and mental standards had their military occupational standard(job) changed. Or after they had fulfilled their obligation they were forced out. It's time that our police a paramilitary organization live up and maintain their standards.


Report abuse

JDS wrote on November 01, 2009 07:38 AM: patrick,
Yes, I understand what I'm saying and I'll say it again...
"The statement by Capt Montandon is as unequivocal as it can be at this point in the investigation. The gun is not handled/examined at the scene but instead put in an evidence collecting bag(don't you watch any TV?). Let's just agree to wait until the final report comes out and then you can come back here and apologize to me."
...there is nothing inconsistent in that statement with anything else I've said. On the contrary, you keep making foolish and inaccurate statements such as this...
"What the mouthpiece actually said was NOTHING, but propaganda designed to cover for his officer."
...The story above says and I have quoted it here on multiple occasions...
"As the officer was chasing the individual giving him orders to stop, the individual reached into his pants pocket, front right, and retrieved what appears to be a .45-caliber handgun," Montandon said."
...now that is definitely SOMETHING and if that is true, there definitely was/is a gun. I will wait for the final report and then I fully expect your apology.


Report abuse

Timothy wrote on October 31, 2009 08:15 PM: This story also states he pulled a gun after being stopped for making an illegal U turn.


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/10/30/state/n084358D72.DTL


Report abuse

Timothy wrote on October 31, 2009 08:12 PM:
This story clearly states the police found a gun.


http://cbs5.com/wireapnewsca/Witness.Las.Vegas.2.1281368.html


Report abuse

patrick wrote on October 31, 2009 02:54 PM: JDS:

Your constant mocking only reveals your inadequacies.

First the statement was "unequivocal", now its as unequivocal as it can be at this point; do you even understand what it is you are saying?

Lets just agree that you misspoke out of ignorance and love for the police rather than out of comprehension of what was actually written and then maybe, just maybe, you can get some respect.

As I said before, appearances can be deceiving, what was "apparently" a .45 handgun could be, in reality, a bar of soap fashioned into what "appeared" to be a handgun. This is only one example of the multitude of possibilities.

What the mouthpiece actually said was NOTHING, but propaganda designed to cover for his officer. Which is exactly what you would expect given the previous history of this department. (Wasn't this the same mouthpiece who claimed that the officer who died after turning in front of another truck had his lights and siren on?

And, it matters not what the final report says, because what we have been discussing is your inability to comprehend what you read, all the while chastising and ridiculing others who point out that fact to you.

It does demonstrate that your ego is more important to you than "the truth" which you profess to love. I guess that means you got at least two loves huh?


Report abuse

JDS wrote on October 31, 2009 01:48 PM: patrick,
Try to keep up...I know that may be hard with your limited intelligence, but I already addressed that point in my very first response to you. Here it is...
"As I pointed out to nopar, it's the "retrieving" that is the action part of the sentence, "appears" just modifies the handgun, it may be a .45 or it may be some other caliber."
...The statement by Capt Montandon is as unequivocal as it can be at this point in the investigation. The gun is not handled/examined at the scene but instead put in an evidence collecting bag(don't you watch any TV?). Let's just agree to wait until the final report comes out and then you can come back here and apologize to me.


Report abuse

Bob White wrote on October 31, 2009 01:16 PM: Please, all you cop lover and normal people go to this web site to find the reason people run from the cops. This is important.

http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/41647882.html


Report abuse

patrick wrote on October 31, 2009 01:15 PM: JDS:

I can see now what nopar has clearly all ready seen; your love for the police has blinded you.

While there is little doubt that the police mouthpiece is lying, that is not the issue and never has been. The issue is whether an object can "appear" to be one thing, and in fact, be something else. Your refusal to admit this is standing in your ability to comprehend what you have read.

If the police found a .45 caliber handgun and wanted to be unequivocal, it would be a simple matter to say "we found a .45 caliber handgun. The qualifier used by the mouthpiece in this case permits a different conclusion to be reached and thus there is no "unequivocal" statement at all.

What appears to be may not always be and your refusal to acknowledge this means you are not comprehending what it is that is said or written.

Alternatively, you are refusing to acknowledge the truth, which makes your previously professed "love" for it rather suspect.


Report abuse

JDS wrote on October 31, 2009 11:14 AM: patrick,
You are correct, I do love police officers. But I love the truth even more. I only posted here because nopar made the ignorant comment that there was no gun and then ridiculed us for not being able to read. But according to this article and the statement by the police spokesman, there was/is a gun. Now if the police spokesman lied, then that is something different, But again, and I quote again, according to this article...
"As the officer was chasing the individual giving him orders to stop, the individual reached into his pants pocket, front right, and retrieved what appears to be a .45-caliber handgun,"
...that unequivocally means there was/is a gun. That is just reading comprehension; for you to argue this point is just pure stubborness on your part, even nopar has desisted.


Read All Comments