Comments (28) | Add a comment
Jane Ann Morrison
Nevada State College braces for budget cuts or worse
Tools
More Columns
More Blogs
Clark County firefighters who raise money for charity must now do it on their own time
Applause for Beers at GOP dinner thundering
National spotlight on Mob Museum highlights 'Sin City'
Morse Arberry Jr. reaches plea deal; charges to be knocked down to misdemeanor
Commissioner needs to choose his battles wisely
Updated: Apr. 10, 2012 | 10:59 a.m.
Supporters of the fledgling Nevada State College are running scared, trying to deflect rumors the college might be closed to help balance the higher education budget. The state's only four-year college is feeling like an unwanted stepchild hoping for a fairy godmother.
Nevada System of Higher Education Chancellor Dan Klaich mentioned closing it as a possibility in his litany of cuts. Then Las Vegas Review-Journal columnist Geoff Schumacher wrote the college's "contribution to the state system is negligible" and snubbed it as the "least vital" institution.
Fighting words, my friend.
No one knows how severe the cuts in higher education might be until the Legislature's special session ends. But there's a sense of hysteria about what may be required to balance the budget.
The state's total shortfall is a moving target. The latest estimate: $871 million.
Closing the state college would save $11 million a year and disrupt the studies of about 2,600 students.
I don't think that's going to happen. Although he's just one vote out of 13, Regent Chairman James Dean Leavitt opposes wholesale abandonment of the state college. "I personally am a strong supporter of the college."
When it opened in 2002 in Henderson as the pet project of then Assembly Speaker Richard Perkins, the college was pitched with the understanding that its primary mission was to graduate more nurses and teachers.
So have they?
I know a few certified nursing assistants working on their degrees at Nevada State College. In casual conversations they've said they believe they are getting a solid education. Some work full time and yet go to college and have families. Frankly, I'm in awe of what they do.
Spencer Stewart, associate vice president of college relations, contends the college is meeting its mission.
Since 2004, the first year students were eligible to graduate from the college, 861 students have graduated. Of those, 437 earned four-year nursing degrees and 175 earned degrees in education. About 90 percent of the nurses have stayed in the state, he said.
The regents never contemplated these would be the only two degrees offered and have approved others, Stewart said. Students have graduated with degrees in social sciences (109), business (69), humanities (54) and physical sciences (17).
At the state college, 45 percent of the students are the first in their family to attend a college or university. And 45 percent are racial or ethnic minorities. Some 57 percent are self-supporting and many support families.
Could they attend the University of Nevada, Las Vegas? Sure, if they could get in and if classes would fit into their work schedule.
But it's more expensive -- $136 per credit versus $98 at the state college. And it takes a 3.2 grade point average to get into UNLV versus 2.0 at the state college. The community colleges are cheaper and easier to get into.
The College of Southern Nevada saw the state college as an upstart that could easily be absorbed into its system (and its already existing buildings) if regents would approve four-year degrees for the community colleges, instead of two-year degrees.
Even Leavitt believes the state college "has clearly gone beyond its original mission." But the additional degrees were all added with the blessing of the regents. What the regents added, they can take way.
Leavitt said that throughout the system "there's always a program or two that hasn't performed as expected. We'll have the opportunity to eliminate some programs that should have been eliminated years ago."
Nevada State College will take hits and may lose some programs, like every other institution.
Regents may whittle it back to its original focus of graduating teachers and nurses.
But closing it entirely would be a mistake and shortsighted.
Jane Ann Morrison's column appears Monday, Thursday and Saturday. E-mail her at Jane@reviewjournal.com or call 702- 383-0275. She also blogs at lvrj.com/blogs/morrison.
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Jane, Often I agree with your opinions & conclusions; however, not this time. Nevada State College was a mistake from the beginning. It was created during a time when UNLV's president, Carol Harter, was under attack and likewise the president of CCSN (now CSN) had lost the confidence of the political powers at that time for his gross mismanagement of that institution. Rather than creating more seats at both institutions to train more teachers and nurses at a nominal incremental cost, an entire new institution was formed wasting millions of taxpayer dollars annually. We now have the opportunity to correct this mistake and we should NOT let this pass by.
How am I qualified to hold these opinions? I've been involved in healthcare administration in Las Vegas for 30+ years. I received 3 Associates degrees from CCCC (now CSN) plus a BSBA and an MBA from UNLV. I have also taught for both institutions on a part time basis as adjunct faculty.
The programs are sound. They simply need to be expanded. The main bottleneck in CSN's nursing program is in the number of lab seats available for the pre-requisite courses necessary for entrance into CSN's AA-Nursing program. Create more lab seats. Hire more faculty. That will produce more nurses. Rather than implementing this very simple, cost-effective solution, an entire new multi-million dollar institution was built from scratch!
Transfer the staff & faculty needed to accomodate the students from Nevada State College to CSN & UNLV, then transfer the students out of that bad idea and let them continue their education at these existing institutions. Those who want a 2-year AA degree can transfer to CSN. Those who want a 4-year BS degree can go to UNLV. That is the right solution both now and in the long term.
NSC will fail due to a few out of control ego's and their own personal agenda's. They've repeatedly turned their backs on the local talent that would have brought them a higher enrollment.