News

New ads target Titus

  • Photo by Craig L. Moran

    Rep. Dina Titus, D-Nev., shown during an Aug. 25 interview at the Review-Journal, is being criticized -- or cheered -- in new video advertisements aimed at Nevadans.

By Benjamin Spillman
Las Vegas Review-Journal
Posted: Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:00 p.m.
Updated: Apr. 10, 2012 | 9:58 a.m.

After voting in favor of health care reform legislation, Rep. Dina Titus finds herself caught in the crossfire between special interest groups.

At least three groups -- two opposed to the bill, one in favor -- feature Titus, D-Nev., in new video ads aimed at Nevadans.

The groups are focusing on Titus because hers is the most contested congressional race in the state this election cycle, when health care will probably be a top issue.

Reform legislation backers want to help Titus raise money and get votes, while opponents sense an opportunity to make her and others who voted for the bill pay for it at the ballot box.

"Republicans are going to take a look at any and all of the freshmen," said Nathan Gonzalez, an editor at the non-partisan Rothenberg Political Report. "They're looking for every opportunity to try and crawl back to a majority."

Among the new ads featuring Titus is one by the group 60 Plus, which bill itself as a conservative alternative to the AARP. The group said it spent $1.5 million in nine markets, including Las Vegas.

Each version of its "How could you" ads features seniors from the targeted district criticizing a representative for voting in favor of the bill.

"The House passed a 2,000-page health care bill that cuts Medicare $400 billion, raises taxes on small business killing jobs and makes insurance you have cost more," the announcer in the 60 Plus ad says.

Later, a senior identified as Betty Rumford of Las Vegas says, "Nevada seniors won't forget."

Carl Forti, a spokesman for The 60 Plus group, said it doesn't take money from insurance companies or political action committees, and raises funds through individual contributions from dues-paying members.

"We believe that the Senate should not cut Medicare. This bill creates hundreds of entitlements and the only one it cuts is Medicare," Forti said.

But others say 60 Plus has twisted the facts in past ads aimed at seniors.

An analysis by the non-partisan Web site www.factcheck.org labeled a previous health care ad by 60 Plus as "mostly false".

The fact check group says 60 Plus exaggerated cuts to Medicare by not including enhancements and couldn't back up claims that cuts in question would mean long waits for care.

Another ad thanks Titus for voting in favor of the reform bill. Health Care for America Now, the advocacy group behind the ad, is backed by Obama and Vice President Joe Biden. The latter attended a Titus fundraiser on Sunday in Las Vegas.

The group says it supports making health care affordable for every person, family and business, as well as backing a "public option" in the bill, which is a government-run health insurance program that could compete with private plans.

Yet another ad campaign by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce takes Titus to task for the vote. The ad tells viewers to call Titus to tell her "she should have said 'no' to Washington and 'yes' to Nevada."

Whether the ads will work remains to be seen. Titus' district is leaning in favor of Democrats over Republicans by about 40,000 voters, and has about 73,000 registered nonpartisans, according to Nevada Secretary of State statistics.

Republicans vying for the chance to challenge Titus include former state Sen. Joe Heck and Army veteran and military police reservist Rob Lauer.

"This is a district that has moved from a tossup district to a Democratic-leaning district since it was initially drawn," Gonzalez said.

Titus said she supported the health care legislation only after changes were made to reduce the number of people who would pay a surtax to pay for the plan by increasing the threshold for taxation from people making $280,000 to $500,000 and from $350,000 to $1 million for families.

Still, Titus spokesman Andrew Stoddard said the congresswoman expected to take some heat for the vote. "Knowing this was a big vote, we expected both sides are going to be out there trying to push their message on it," Stoddard said. "It almost feels like the election is a week away, with all the TV ads."

Contact reporter Benjamin Spillman at bspillman@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3861.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. Miles Monroe Nov. 17, 2009 | 4:34 p.m. Report Abuse

    This is just the first in a string of votes that Titus will cast to screw her constituents. She'll support crap and tax as well as amnesty. She needs to be voted out and ran out of town. She's lived her entire life on the public dole. She's cost Nevada enough and it's time to stop the insanity.

  2. Moe.Greene Nov. 17, 2009 | 11:22 a.m. Report Abuse

    Dina is a one-term wonder. She was against it but then was for it. Yet, her office won't tell us what the deal she made was. Could she have possibly sold her vote for a visit from braindead Joe Biden? I know she is backwards but she can't be that stupid.

    She is already done for and no amount of revisionism on her part will change it. The DNC would be wise to write her off as a loser and focus on districts where they can win.

  3. hdstmf Nov. 17, 2009 | 10:23 a.m. Report Abuse

    Let's see...

    Medicare money will be shifted to help pay for the wonderful dimorats health care plan. A bu-rat panel will advise me to die to help pay for the wonderful dimorats health care plan. Blah, blah, blah...

    The three blind mice, "O", Reid and Peelocy intend to throw me in jail if I don't buy the dimorats health care insurance plan.

    I may have the answer to saving myself. I'll just refuse to sign up for their health care insurance. I'll turn myself in to the "O" health care police and plead guilty. An "O" appointed federal judge can sentence me life in one of the "O" prison camps. I can then file appeals to the UN, ALCU, the World Court, and other assorted groups. I'll become a high profile inmate. You know the type. A darling of the mainstream media, Hollywood's over-the-hill crowd and other assorted do-gooders. I'll be untouchable by the death panel. My health care be as good as the congress critters. Best of all, it won't cost me anything.

    Maybe enough of us getting on this gravy train wiil sink the dimorats health care leaky ship.

  4. Blak Nov. 17, 2009 | 9:20 a.m. Report Abuse

    The funny thing about politics is that when you fail to represent your district properly your career tends to run on the short side. Dina should have listened to the voice of her constituents instead of voting partisan with her liberal party. She would have started a long career if she would have simply done what we hired her to do. Foolish.

Friday, May 25, 2012
Overcast Overcast, 79° Weather Forecast