Comments (25) | Add a comment
Panel targets dropping 35 state boards, commissions
Tools
REVIEW-JOURNAL CAPITAL BUREAU
Updated: Nov. 18, 2011 | 8:08 a.m.
CARSON CITY -- A new legislative subcommittee took aim Thursday at the possible elimination of 35 state boards and commissions, including the state Wildlife and Ethics commissions.
During the first meeting of Legislature's Sunset Subcommittee, members identified the boards and commissions they want to call in and ask to provide justification for their continued existence.
Some such as the Commission on Sports have not met in decades and clearly will be abolished. But others, including the Wildlife and Ethics commissions, were placed on the subcommittee's bull's-eye largely because they are controversial or failed to respond to legislative requests for information.
"We aren't saying these boards are good or bad," said Sen. Sheila Leslie, D-Reno, chairwoman of the nine-member subcommittee. "Every board and commission eventually will be looked at."
The Sunset Subcommittee was created through a bill sponsored by Sen. Ben Kieckhefer, R-Reno. Approved unanimously and signed by Gov. Brian Sandoval, the law allows the subcommittee to determine whether boards or commissions "should be terminated, modified, consolidated with another agency or continued."
Kieckhefer said during hearings that his goal was to ensure "taxpayers were getting the biggest bang for their buck" by reviewing boards to make sure they are operating efficiently and effectively.
He also said the committee's creation was recommended by the Spending and Government Efficiency Commission, which reviewed state government when Jim Gibbons was governor and identified ways to save money.
The subcommittee's recommendations are due June 30 and on the same day every other year.
Any recommendations made next year must be approved by the Legislature in 2013 before a board can be eliminated.
Starting in February, Sunset Subcommittee members will look at a few boards each month. Members of the boards will be asked to attend and answer questions.
Leslie wants to look at the Wildlife Commission because it has been mired in controversy and is dominated by pro-hunting members.
Gibbons was accused of packing the commission with pro hunters. Commissioners last year established the state's first bear hunting season, enraging animal support groups and others.
Assemblywoman Irene Bustamante Adams, D-Las Vegas, recommended the subcommittee look at eliminating or modifying the Wildlife Commission.
Bustamante Adams said she had "no particular reason" for the Wildlife Commission's inclusion other than the fact it did not respond to calls from legislative staff members inquiring about when it most recently met.
Contacted in Reno, Ken Mayer, state Wildlife Department director and secretary to the Wildlife Commission, said he never received any phone calls from the Legislature. He said the Wildlife Commission last met on Sept. 23-24.
All calls for the Wildlife Commission go to the Department of Wildlife. Mayer said a call might not have been forwarded to him.
Leslie said several other boards that did not respond to legislative staff members also will asked to appear before the commission, including the Ethics Commission and the Executive Branch Audit Committee.
Caren Jenkins, executive director of the Ethics Commission, said she didn't recall getting any calls seeking information on the panel's meetings.
At one point during the hearing, former Assemblyman David Goldwater, D-Las Vegas, noted he had been a member of the Nevada Commission on Sports for eight or nine years, and the committee did not meet once.
Goldwater, one of three nonlegislators on the subcommittee, said it made sense to include nonfunctioning boards on the potential cut list.
Assemblyman Richard McArthur, R-Las Vegas, said the subcommittee might look at combining operations of the state Athletic Commission, the Commission on Sports and the Board of Athletic Trainers.
Legislative staff members now will contact the boards and commissions on the potential cut list and ask them to furnish minutes of their meetings, contact information on their board members, their financial records, websites and other information.
Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Hunting and Trophy hunting are to two different things... I am for hunting I am AGAINST TROPHY hunting and these bear hunters have the audacity to say the all eat the meat... SUCH BULL!!!!
Just another leftwing move to restrict hunting...all these leftwing "animal righst" activist ARE the "special interest" that the article speaks of...and these elected assembymen and women are bowing to THAT special interest...what about residents of Nevada? leave the Wildlife Commision alone - they have done well - despite what the PETA and other leftwing animal rights groups say...
WE need people in office that have American Values, Traditions and Principles. The type that made US the Strongest, Bravest, most Prosperous nation on earth.
Vote RIGHT!...and vote them all out - from City hall - to the halls of Congress. RESTORE AMERICA.
The Nevada Wildlife Commission Has proven that they non't care what the people want they only do what they want or what special interest has paid them to do...their answer was we do it because we can...
Most boards and commissions were created as political favors for special interest groups or supporters of politician's. They do nothing for We The People just special interest and should have never been formed in the first place...
Get rid of NDOW.. It should stand for Nothing Depends On Wildlife!!! They are all appointed by the governor and fail to listen to public majority and go by their own rules and ideas!!!!! They use so called scientific proof from one of their own and ignore other UNBIASED proof!!!! Healy is a joke !!!!!
Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners
Nevada State Board of Nursing
Board of Pharmacy - State of Nevada
Nevada State Board of Dental Examiners
Nevada State Board of osteopathic medicine
Nevada State Board of physical therapy
Nevada State Board of Athletic Trainers
State of Nevada Board of Occupational Therapy
State of Nevada Board of massage therapists
Chiropractic Physicians' Board of Nevada
State of Nevada Board of Hearing Aid Specialists
Oriental Medicine State Board
Osteopathic Medicine Board
Prostate Cancer Task Force (Health Division)
Registered Evironmental Health Specialists
All these commissions and task forces are related to the medical field. There is reason to believe that given the sheer magnitude of administrative oversight and day to day operations, there may be some redundancy in their administrative costs. Therefore, examine that redundancy of administrative costs. The licensing processors surely have the same paper pushing processes or out of that list someone might actually have some efficiencies. With investigators who are well versed in the whole realm of medical practices it would make for better defining who is practicing without a license.
I'm on the Nevada Commission on Sports Board. We hang out in sports bars and watch games on the big screen. All this I do for you the good citizens of Nevada. It's a tuff job, but someone has to do it.
@George; Thank you. We should at the least only let them meet every other year and only if they do away with uninforcible and duplicate laws.
A more productive approach would be to eliminate the Legislature.
@ GARY D; ARE YOU OR ANY REPUBLICANS THAT HAVE BEEN ELECTED IN THIS STATE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYTHING BAD ? HERE'S A HINT; THE TWO PARTIES ARE THE SAME THIEVES WITH DIFFERENT POCKETS. THE NEW GOVERNOR WANTS A NEW COMMITTEE AFTER THE OLD ONE HAS BEEN GONE FOR YEARS. HE'S A COMMIE FOOL.