Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


Nineteen chosen for panel

CARSON CITY -- Nineteen Nevadans were nominated Monday to serve as members of a "stakeholder" group that will recommend plans to improve the quality of life in the state, but critics have said they will favor tax increases.

Among those nominated by a legislative subcommittee were retired Assembly Speaker Joe Dini, D-Yerington; Alan Feldman, senior vice president for public affairs for MGM Mirage, and Keith Smith, president of Boyd Gaming Corp.


Most Popular Stories
  • 'YOU DON'T BLOW A BUNCH OF CASH IN VEGAS ...': Obama remark reopens wound
  • LAUGHLIN EDGEWATER: Two dead in casino car crash
  • NORM: Ad's Strip scenes raised eyebrows
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Former commander of USS Cole considers run against Reid
  • NORM: $1 million wager on Super Bowl approved
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • IMAGES FROM 1860S: Photos show historic Nevada
  • Fighter battles rare disease that shatters mixed martial arts dream
  • Flood advisory for Las Vegas Valley




  • The group will work with a company, likely Moody's Analytics, which will be chosen Thursday to study state taxes.

    Its recommendations, due in July, will be considered in the 2011 Legislature.

    In the resolution for the tax study, legislators told the chosen firm to "review proposals for broad-based taxes which are fair and equitable." The stakeholders group was told to "develop a quality of life vision" for the next 20 years.

    Moody's submitted a bid of $253,000 to conduct the tax study. The Legislature's Interim Finance Committee is expected Thursday to approve that bid and finalize members of the stakeholder group.

    Critics complained that it is a done deal the study will conclude state government should increase taxes.

    Geoff Lawrence, a fiscal policy analyst with the Nevada Policy Research Institute, said that none of the stakeholder members is a "taxpayers advocate."

    "It looks to me like the bulk are public employees or union representatives, along with gaming and mining representatives," he said. "It's predictable. The public employees and union representatives likely will advocate more funding to them. The mining and gaming representatives will make sure someone else is paying."

    Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.

    TAX STUDY GROUP NOMINEES

    People nominated to the Nevada tax study group include the following:
    • Joe Dini, retired legislator and Yerington casino owner
    • Keith Smith, Boyd Gaming president and chief executive officer
    • Alan Feldman, MGM Mirage senior vice president
    • Boyd Martin, Associated General Contractors
    • Donald Snyder, Smith Center for the Performing Arts
    • Doug Dirks, Employers Holdings Inc.
    • Paul Dugan, former Washoe County School District superintendent
    • Rene Cantu, Latin Chamber of Commerce
    • Marsha Irvin, Andre Agassi Preparatory Academy
    • Brian Rippett, Nevada State Education Association
    • Peter Bernhard, Cleveland Clinic Nevada
    • Sylvia Young, Sunrise Health
    • Susan Rhodes, National Association of Social Workers
    • Denis Tanata Ashby, Nevada Institute for Children's Research and Policy
    • Thomas Perrigo, Department of Planning and Development, city of Las Vegas
    • Robert Potter, Nevada Department of Transportation
    • Terry Reynolds, Reynolds Co.
    • Katy Simon, Washoe County
    • Cedric Williams, North Las Vegas Fire Department

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 12 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    gary wrote on November 18, 2009 12:10 AM: For our state that has budget restraints, they are to pay 253,000 dollars for another study. It's amazing how they seem to find money when they say we don't have the money for any needed services. Carson City must have found a pot of gold. NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!!!!!


    These people just have dollar signs in their eyes wrote on November 17, 2009 11:37 AM: Are you kidding me? Kate Marshall is supporting the prosecution of Brian Krolicki.

    She and Catherine Cortez-Mastos are very cozy.

    They are totally on board with everything this article is revealing.

    And that is "How do we pocket more money for worthless returns?"


    The IFC is unconstitutional wrote on November 17, 2009 11:30 AM: Apparently, the foxes are once again in charge of the hen house, once again.

    I certainly would like to see the Gov. shut down the Interim Finance Committee as unconstitutional. This Committee has morphed into something it was never intended to be. It is not a legislative branch of the state government.


    Too_many_criminal_NY_bankers wrote on November 17, 2009 11:07 AM: State Treasurer Kate Marshall made the decision to invest $50M of public Pooled Investment Funds in a Wall $t firm's "risk-free" fund. A fund that held (surprise!) CMO bonds -- debt which was improperly (to put it mildly) rated AAA by a hopelessly conflicted Moody's.

    That fund that is now worthless. We lost $50M. Somehow, Marshall is *still* in office. Why isn't she screaming at the Legislature to avoid these criminals from Moody's?


    Too_many_criminal_NY_bankers wrote on November 17, 2009 08:25 AM: The group will work with a company, likely Moody's Analytics ..

    Moody's raked in HUGE Wall $t fees by assigning AAA ratings to Collateralized Mortgage bonds which were actually JUNK. The Nevada treasury was a $50M victim of this charade, as were thousands of individual Nevadans, whose losses in toto were much more. Before we give Moody's $250K more of our money, we should INSIST that they first reimburse us.

    Except for those two Socialist casino operators, these so-called stakeholders represent a "Who's Who?" of Nevada tax consumers.

    If we had small government in this state, the biennial budget could be reduced to $160M and probably LESS. Cig taxes alone would cover it, with money leftover to rebate to us. That's right. No tax study required.


    Moody's submitted a bid of $253,000 to conduct the tax study wrote on November 17, 2009 08:03 AM: Why are we continually paying big bucks for studies??????

    Further, who are the share holders in the LLC that won the bid?????

    The panel choices are the biggest laugh!

    Clean house next election!


    RonNV wrote on November 17, 2009 07:44 AM: I do not care what some advisory panel recommends. I can tell you as a business advisor that if you increase taxes or create a gross receipts or income tax then the business community will start leaving Nevada. No new businesses will set up shop here. They will go elsewhere. You need to cut expenditures on wasteful stuff and economize. The reality is that tax increases killed the New Jersey and California economy.


    And Horsford on the Interim Finance Committee, don't forget him! wrote on November 17, 2009 07:08 AM: I agree with every post preceding mine.

    Could this panel selection scream any louder what their objectives are? TAXES!

    And, indeed, it looks like our legislators have learned "community organization" from Obama playbook. Just make sure you organize partisan and biased committees.

    The political landscape better look different after November 2010. Or I think taxpayers are going to have to lawyer up against these biased and partisan "committees."

    Maybe do away with the Interim Finance Committee, because it has evolved into a fiscal/political monster.


    afterwords wrote on November 17, 2009 06:41 AM: This absolutely STINKS! I don't see any small business owners or employees at all! A social worker? This is bogus...I want the RJ to publish who selected this group. It's very one sided liberally biased.


    br wrote on November 17, 2009 05:37 AM: Since there are 19 elite panelist, I recommend additional appointment of 20 common folks. All would work for free. Save the $253,000 for something important, like a new city hall, the mob museum, a sports arena or a statue of Oscar.


    Read All Comments