Comments (61) | Add a comment
John L. Smith
North Las Vegas prosecutors have a good reason to ride the bus
Tools
More Columns
More Blogs
Updated: Apr. 10, 2012 | 10:46 a.m.
At the North Las Vegas Municipal Court, judges and administrators park in a fenced and gated lot with a keypad security entry system.
In the wake of the recent deadly shooting at the federal courthouse downtown, such precautions are obviously justified. Judges can make violent enemies. To do less would invite trouble.
It's too bad that same respect isn't accorded the city prosecutors who are forced to park in an unsecured area that puts them just 20 feet or so from where defendants are released from the adjacent detention center.
The parking arrangement invites trouble.
Repeated attempts to reach Chief Jim Jackson, who is in charge of security at the court, have been unsuccessful. Courthouse sources tell me Jackson recently met with prosecutors about the safety issue, but so far no changes have been made.
In an effort to minimize contact outside court between prosecutors and defendants, North Las Vegas detention center inmates are often released early in the morning and late in the day after the court has closed. It's also true armed marshals are in the general area.
But I'm told reliably that those minimal safety precautions haven't prevented defendants from approaching prosecutors in the parking area and attempting to discuss pending cases. And nothing has prevented family members from eyeballing the attorneys and making snide comments. Defendants accessing court services stand in line in full view of the prosecutors' parking spaces.
"Parking is always a critical aspect of court security," Lt. Jimmie H. Barrett Jr. says. An 18-year law enforcement veteran, Barrett supervises security at the Arlington County (Va.) Courthouse and is the author of "Protecting Court: A Practitioner's Guide to Court Security." "You always want to ensure that you don't mix areas where people may come into contact with each other who may not feel very positive toward each other."
Frankly, it seems like a no-brainer.
While declining to address the issue directly at the North Las Vegas court, Barrett says security often becomes lax outside the courthouse door.
At Clark County District Court and U.S. District Court, court personnel parking is segregated and secure.
North Las Vegas prosecutors deserve the same protection.
"A lot of people do forget prosecutors aren't exactly loved by the people they're prosecuting," Barrett says. "If you can't segregate people, some effort should be made to put some anonymity where people are parking. It's kind of important."
In other words, no signs identifying the space as belonging to members of the prosecution.
After studying the history of courthouse violence in America, Barrett concludes that just because a court is small or handles mostly misdemeanors, as is the case in North Las Vegas, doesn't make it any less susceptible to violence.
On the contrary, he observes, courts of limited jurisdiction in smaller communities often have been the scene of deadly shootings and brutal physical assaults.
"A lot of them don't happen in the big cities," he says.
And the defendants who act violently, or cause others to act on their behalf, aren't always the ones facing life sentences. In the case of the recent deadly shooting of senior court security officer Stan Cooper at the federal courthouse, a man with a criminal history, Johnny Lee Wicks, came packing a shotgun out of frustration with a reduction in his Social Security benefits.
The key to success, in Barrett's estimation, is in being proactive. Although being proactive includes checking hate-mongering Web sites that encourage violence against the judiciary and other justice system officials, he notes that the physical line of defense starts at the edge of the courthouse grounds and should certainly include the area where the prosecutors park.
Says one interested observer of the North Las Vegas court, "This is an accident, murder, stabbing, or beating just waiting to happen."
John L. Smith's column appears Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. E-mail him at Smith@reviewjournal.com or call (702) 383-0295. He also blogs at lvrj.com/blogs/smith.
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
LOL...don't make me laugh!!!
I am not the one hiding behind a fake name. You got nothin babe.
You can't argue this issue.
Buh Bye now.
The plain and simple truth is ~ the Chief of Security COULD allow the prosecutors to park in a secure place, BUT he is CHOOSING not to.
Let's be honest here!
He simply doesn't want to move any of the admin people or the wife of the Chief of Police. It's all political BS. It's privilege over security.
I do find it humorous that none of the MEN offer to give up THEIR secure spot in back.
If it's not such a big deal and it's so safe, the men should "man up" and allow the female prosecutors park safely ~ but that's just MY opinion. My husband said he would surely give up a secure spot for a woman.
I hope the NLV City Attorney is making note of all this.
This IS an attack or murder of a prosecutor waiting to happen.
Remember, it just happened to an armed Marshall in LV over social security benefits!!! Hello ~ Prosecutors are not the most favorite people of defendants and their families.
I'll just keep on kickin that dead horse thank you.
The quote is from the article. LOL
Ignorant - lacking knowledge; uninformed