Comments (8) | Add a comment
Iraq War veteran sentenced to prison in deputy's shooting
Tools
-
Joseph Patrick Lamoureux was sentenced to up to 10 years for a Pahrump shooting spree that left a Nye County sheriff's deputy wounded. Gary Thompson/Las Vegas Review-Journal » Buy this photo
-
Joseph Patrick Lamoureux waves to family and friends as he is escorted back to jail after being sentenced to up to 10 years in prison for a Pahrump shooting spree that left a Nye County sheriff's deputy wounded. Gary Thompson/Las Vegas Review-Journal » Buy this photo
-
Eric Murphy
Deputy
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Updated: Feb. 16, 2011 | 7:36 a.m.
PAHRUMP -- Iraq war veteran Joseph Patrick "Pat" Lamoureux was sentenced Tuesday to up to 10 years in prison for a shooting spree that left him and a Nye County sheriff's deputy wounded.
District Judge Robert Lane said the claim by public defender Tom Gibson that the Sept. 19, 2008, spree by Lamoureux was sparked by a bout of post-traumatic stress disorder "lacks credibility." Gibson said the disorder was related to Lamoureux's war experience with a Las Vegas-based Army Reserve unit in 2003. Witnesses were divided on the issue.
In a plea bargain in December, Lamoureux, 48, pleaded guilty to two felonies -- battery and assault with a deadly weapon -- and a gross misdemeanor of discharging a weapon.
Under the agreement, Nye County district attorney's office prosecuors dropped 12 other charges, including attempted murder, in the shooting of deputy Eric Murphy at Terrible's Lakeside RV Park. Lane gave Lamoureux credit for having served 2½ years in the Nye County jail.
Chief Prosecutor Kirk Vitto said Lamoureux had virtues as a soldier with the 257th Transportation Company, but "he went completely over the top" on the date of the shooting.
At Tuesday's hearing, Murphy and Nye County Detective David Boruchowitz reflected on the emotional stress they and their families endured after Lamoureux fired 61 rounds from two handguns while hiding behind boulders near a berm at the edge of the RV park.
Boruchowitz said he thought he was sending Murphy to a safe location at the berm.
Instead, "I was sending him directly in the path of the person who was trying to kill us."
Murphy was struck by three bullets.
"Knowing that Eric Murphy was probably somewhere on the back side of the berm needing help, we began to move forward where we thought the shots were coming from," Boruchowitz said.
"I saw Mr. Lamoureux laying by the rocks and took the first shot at him. He said he was 'out' and threw his arms up."
Murphy said that although he did not suffer life-threatening wounds, "there was a distinct moment there when I was laying in that ambulance that I thought I was going to die. I took off my wedding ring and gave it to Deputy (Kaycee) Otteson and told her to tell my wife that I love her. "
Lamoureux's wife, Sue, has said her husband snapped that day and was having nightmarish flashbacks of a suicide bomber attack involving a girl who walked toward his truck.
Two soldiers who served with Lamoureux -- his former first sergeant, Thomas Jennings, and retired truck master James McIntyre -- said the suicide bomber and other combat experiences that Lamoureux described for Veterans Affairs officials when he was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder were not reported to them.
"I'm not saying it didn't happen. I'm saying I was never told," Jennings said.
Both said Lamoureux was a good soldier who did his job and followed orders.
Lamoureux's brother, retired Army Col. Christopher Lamoureux, who commanded a mortuary unit, said that when his brother returned from Iraq, "Patrick was a different person. The Army did change him. He had a psychological problem, and I encouraged him to go to the VA, and he did."
Joseph Patrick Lamoureux told the judge he did not recall what happened the night of the shooting spree.
"I am extremely remorseful for causing the horrible incident that morning, and I thank God for protecting deputy Murphy and the other officers involved," he said.
"My combat experiences in Iraq impact me deeply. You do not understand unless you have lived it."
Contact Keith Rogers at krogers@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0308.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
DUH! This man needs the VA to stand up and or mental hospital confinement!
@intrepid..i bet the rj could at least spell "defendant" and "what" correctly. dont misunderstand me, im sure the rj has printed its share of errors...but i expect more intelligence from someone casting stones from their glass balcony.
I´m a veteran of Iraq, i understand the problems and stress that can come from that, but Lamoureux shot a Cop.
Intrepid,
You are right on the inaccuracy on the sentence, but here, it not only was it stated inaccurately, but also incorrectly.
Specifically, he was given:
6-15 years for the Battery with Deadly weapon causing substantial bodily harm
2-6 years for the Assault with Deadly weapon
AND
I year in the county jail for a gross
All consecutive. So, the total was 9-22 years. This needs to be corrected.
It's hard to turn off the kill switch when your government has turned you into a hired killer to further the bank roll of the military industrial complex, and call it defending 'freedom.'
I hate when they fail to report accurately. In Nevada prison sentences read like "4-10 years", or "2-10". Come on RJ please report the news correctly. Saying "up to 10 years" does not tell us what he was actually sentenced to. And I love the judge saying that the defense claims "lack credibility". If an expert witness claims that it was possible, then it does not lack credibility. Now a judge can choose to not believe it but by saying it lacks credibility only makes the judge lack credibility. The dedendant deserves wha he got, don't misunderstand me, but I expect more intelligence from the judge.
Must not have trained him to shoot very well either.
He knew what he was doing wrong.