Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
Ruth wrote on November 21, 2009 02:12 PM:
Uh, guys, there were only four media suing for the right to the documents; the AP, Review-Journal, LA Times, and wait for it, TMZ. No other 'news organizations' were involved in the battle to unseal the record. So why leave out TMZ? Is it because you don't consider them news? Despite the fact TMZ has broken much of the news on this story, it seems funny that you'd leave them out of the list of media. Oh, yeah, we wouldn't want to be seen as in the same bed as that tabloid organization, would we?
Also, nice job in keeping the rest of the media from getting the documents for most of the day. Must be nice to be able to pay for access to coverage. Oh yeah, your attorney was only fighting for your rights to see the stuff right, not helping you keep the information from everyone else until after the news was covered by the AP, TMZ, LA Times and Review-Journal.
RSS