Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


CORRECTION: This story in Monday's Review-Journal about the health care bill before the U.S. Senate Finance Committee contained an error. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., placed in the bill a clause that Nevada and three other states would not have to pay any increased costs for Medicaid if the bill wins approval. The insertion was not in the form of an amendment.

PROPOSED MEDICAID EXPANSION: Plan could be costly to Nevada

Health care bill would nearly double number of recipients

CARSON CITY -- The number of Nevadans receiving free medical care would nearly double by 2015 under provisions of the health care bill being developed in the U.S. Senate Finance Committee.

A record 222,022 residents now receive medical care through the state-federal Medicaid program. That total would increase by 217,000 under the national health care bill, according to an analysis done by the state Health Care Financing and Policy Division.


Most Popular Stories
  • Obama dings Las Vegas — again
  • Obama dings Las Vegas — again
  • 'YOU DON'T BLOW A BUNCH OF CASH IN VEGAS ...': Obama remark reopens wound
  • LAUGHLIN EDGEWATER: Two dead in casino car crash
  • NORM: Ad's Strip scenes raised eyebrows
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • IMAGES FROM 1860S: Photos show historic Nevada
  • NORM: $1 million wager on Super Bowl approved
  • Fighter battles rare disease that shatters mixed martial arts dream
  • Flood advisory for Las Vegas Valley
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz




  • The move to expand Medicaid comes at a time when the state can least afford it, although Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has proposed an amendment to prevent Nevada from absorbing additional costs under the health care bill.

    But Charles Duarte, administrator of the division, is not convinced the amendment will be approved.

    If it fails, then Duarte said Nevada would be responsible for 13 percent to 18 percent of the costs of adding the 217,000 new Medicaid recipients, along with what it already pays for the current recipients.

    Providing Medicaid to Nevadans already costs the state about $1.5 billion a year, of which $450 million is state funds, Duarte said. Medicaid is the second most costly state government expenditure, trailing only the funding of public education.

    Already state government faces a potential $2.4 billion shortfall for the 2011 legislative session.

    The additional Medicaid costs would be considerable, according to Duarte, although he has not made any estimates yet.

    Reid already has run into criticism from Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and other Republicans who contend he is trying to bring home extra money for Nevada as his re-election bid approaches.

    "There are 574 amendments to the health care bill," Duarte said. "Lord knows what is going to happen. While we are grateful folks are considering 100 percent federal funding for states like Nevada, what happens with the next recession?"

    Duarte said recently he will have to seek another $37 million from the Legislature in 2011 because the current Medicaid enrollment already is 11,000 people above the level funded for in June.

    A U.S. Census Bureau study last week found 21.3 percent of Nevadans lack health insurance, ranking only behind New Mexico and Texas. Nevada's 20.2 percent unemployment rate for children under 18 was highest in the nation.

    Still, state authorities noted that the enrollment in Nevada Check Up, a free health care program for poor children, was down 2,700 recipients in the past year.

    Duarte estimated Tuesday that as many as 75,000 Nevadans who qualify for Medicaid have not enrolled in the program.

    I don't know why," he said. "You would expect they would apply under the current criteria. Some may view it as a hassle."

    Illegal immigrants are not eligible for Medicaid, but under federal law the state must compensate hospitals that provide emergency care for them.

    Ben Kieckhefer, a spokesman for the Department of Health and Human Services, said Nevada has some of the strictest requirements for Medicaid qualification in the country.

    Adults without children qualify for Medicaid only if they earn less than 25 percent of the federal poverty level of $10,830 per year. That means an adult would have to earn less than $2,708 a year.

    Children 6 and younger are eligible for Medicaid if the family earns no more than 133 percent of the poverty level. Children 7 to 18 qualify if the family earns 100 percent of the poverty level. For a family of three, the poverty level would be $18,310 a year.

    Kieckhefer said Nevada's Medicaid qualification rules are so strict that unemployed people receiving benefits do not qualify because their compensation is too high.

    Under the health reform bill in the Senate, Medicaid would be given to all members of a family if its total earnings do not exceed 133 percent of the poverty level.

    In contrast to Nevada, Kieckhefer said New Mexico provides Medicaid to all members of a family whose total earnings are less than 235 percent of the poverty level.

    Besides the poor, Medicaid also is provided to foster children, adopted children, the blind and disabled.

    Although the state has had difficulty in finding doctors to treat children with special medical problems at the reimbursement rates it pays, Kieckhefer said, for patients needing treatment for more general medical problems, enough doctors have been willing to accept Medicaid patients.

    Overall, Duarte is pleased Congress is trying to come up with a plan to ensure everyone has health care coverage.

    He noted health care costs in America are increasing three times as fast as wages.

    "We can't stay where we are now," he said. "As a public administrator, I am concerned what the states will pay will end up being a lot more if reform doesn't happen."

    Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 24 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Pay Attention wrote on October 06, 2009 02:05 PM: Do you even read your own newspaper? The amendment you’re talking about is already part of the bill, thanks to Senator Reid. It’s not in danger of failing because it’s no longer proposed, it’s part of the bill. You should know this, as the RJ already did numerous stories on the subject.


    States'_Rights wrote on October 05, 2009 09:13 PM: Yes, of course. Ensign is a big government stooge, also. He'll vote for an expansion of Medicaid, just so long as the extra money doesn't go to pay for abortions.

    People sure are confused about government programs. How could anyone believe that a government-run health insurance company would be any better than the government-run pension plan (FICA)?


    chopsticks redux wrote on October 05, 2009 06:37 PM: Chopsticks, what do you think happened to those poor suckers that had their money invested with Bernie Maddoff? Did Uncle Sam come in and bail them out (I guess I shouldn't give them any ideas!)? It's called "let the buyer beware!" How is that any different than the Social Security morass we find ourselves in now? And you are quite correct, we should have let CITI, US Bank, Bank of America, AGI, Goldman, Morgan, GM, Ceribus, Mercedes Benz (?) fail. Then out of the ash heap arises more responsible managers of our goods and assets. Instead, we are rewarding poor behavior with money and "it's ok little timmy, we all make mistakes, let me give you this bonus." ENOUGH ALREADY!


    Chop Sticks wrote on October 05, 2009 02:04 PM: Dearest David;

    DD is correct! We should have let CITI, US Bank, Bank of America, AGI, Goldman, Morgan, GM, Ceribus, Mercedes Benz all fail! Add in all the hedge funds and the retirement accounts and the states who held agency bonds and corporate bonds. They all should have been allowed to fail. With credit frozen most businesses would have gone under. Serves them right! The American taxpayer is a slave master. Just like the NPRI is to MM and SA.

    "Here, rich people, take a little money and go away" has been the $300 trillion boondoggle that DOESN'T WORK."

    Yup, since 1900 states have provided old age insurance and health care for poor people; how silly! If the old people can't work let them live off their savings or die...it's their choice. If young kids need to go to a public higher ed school they should apologize every day of their lives thereafter for being nothing more than a slave! Hey P?


    Dear David wrote on October 05, 2009 01:42 PM: Would you please take into account that it is POLITICIANS, R and D, that have foisted this ponzi scheme on us. As far as "hating poor people with a passion", nothing could be farther from the truth. How is putting generation after generation of people in bondage (waiting for that government check to come in the mail) be seen as anything but "hateful"? "Here, poor people, take a little money and go away" has been the $6 trillion boondoggle that DOESN'T WORK. Get it? Any questions? You have to let people be responsible, and held accountable, for their own decisions. Otherwise, you are nothing more than a slave master. And yes, the TARP bailout done by BUSH, was WRONG. But he's a politician, get it? We are merely the sheep. I, am one sheep, that has HAD ENOUGH.


    David wrote on October 05, 2009 01:11 PM: There is a very small middle class now. All the jobs available in Las Vegas don't pay much. I like to see people cry about medicaid recipients. It is so nice that the GOP supporters hate poor people with a passion. Luckily for them there are plenty of rich white people to vote for lil Tark or Susie to beat Reid. We know that the minorities will just stay home on election day so the GOP can take over. The GOP will supply all the answers. Just like they did for the last thirty years. I include WJC, because he signed NAFTA. The budget for ICE was decimated by the GOP controlled congress. ICE is for border patrols. It is OK that they were underfunded by the GOP. The GOP never does any thing wrong. IT is OK the GOP let the multi-national Corporations send all the good jobs to RED CHINA. The GOP is without fault. Regulations are bad. We have to let the Corporations look after us. The Banks and Insurance Companies will take of us. They will be handing out the Chinese made coffin nails and hammers. We will hire undocumented workers at $8.00 to pound the nails.


    Justin wrote on October 05, 2009 12:27 PM: Hey republicans, get your stories straight... Are the evil Dempcrats cutting off social security and medicare so that grandma can't afford to live, or are the bleeding heart Democrats increasing social security and medicare for the welfare roll at the expense of hardworking taxpayers.... You confuse me when you make either point depending on who you are trying to outrage.....


    "DUMP HARRY REID - ENOUGH IS ENOUGH" wrote on October 05, 2009 11:53 AM: Harry's only interest in Nevada is "GETTING REELECTED"

    He promises everything to the ACORN and SEIU lowlifes --- for their votes, and everybody else gets to pay for all their benefits.

    LAWBREAKING ILLEGALS --- SHOULD GET "NOTHING" (except a boot in the ass back to where they came from).

    There should be time limits for Welfare (New York has it -- 2 years max and 2 kids max --- it's working just fine).

    Wake up folks - before we lose it all.

    IT'S WELL PAST TIME TO SEND HARRY REID INTO RETIREMENT -- he can take his snot nosed kid Rory with him.


    Stop digging wrote on October 05, 2009 11:24 AM: It is time to discuss the economic situation we are in, compare it to the ideals of our founding fathers, and come up with solutions. Our federal government offers (and spends) $800 billion per year (whether the money is there or not) on straight WELFARE programs. Then there is another $944 billion spent on social security and medicare. Also, welfare programs. I'm sorry we bought into the Bernie Maddoff Ponzi scheme called social security, and medicare; but just like Bernie's plan, there is no money in that lock box, boys and girls. It is, and always has been, a straight transfer of wealth, from the producers (taxpayers) to the first ones in. Now, there is no money.

    What are you going to do?


    Peter Snow wrote on October 05, 2009 11:14 AM: John Ensign reportedly "willfully" violated federal law, I hope we can deport him...he is a huge pork barrel spender elected by the people so we should repeal the 17th Amendment. If Carson City elected our US Senators, they wouldn't hire a big central government stooge like Ensign to represent the interests of this state.


    Read All Comments