Comments (4) | Add a comment
Regulator to see deluge of water pipeline input
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Updated: Nov. 30, 2011 | 11:49 p.m.
Nevada's top water regulator is about to see his inbox explode.
Conservation groups and other opponents of the Southern Nevada Water Authority's plans to siphon groundwater from across eastern Nevada are preparing to bury State Engineer Jason King in negative public input on the project.
The Center for Biological Diversity alone plans to submit roughly 21,000 comments from its members across the country -- so many that the environmental group has collected them on a DVD it plans to send to King by Friday's deadline for written comment.
An additional 2,000 letters opposing the pipeline project will be delivered to King this week from Southern Nevada residents.
Launce Rake from the anti-pipeline group Great Basin Water Network said one of the letters is from Clark County Commissioner Chris Giunchigliani, who previously served on the water authority board.
A message left for Giunchigliani was not immediately returned.
Rake was one of several water authority critics who held a news conference Monday to tout local opposition to the pipeline and encourage more people to send letters to the state engineer.
The authority has requested state permission to tap up to 126,000 acre-feet of groundwater a year from four valleys in Lincoln and White Pine counties and pump it to Las Vegas through a multibillion-dollar pipeline that would stretch more than 300 miles and supply as many as 450,000 homes.
It will be up to King to decide how much water, if any, the authority should be allowed to withdraw. His decision is expected by the end of March.
King already has plenty of reading to do. His office just wrapped up a hearing on the authority's groundwater applications that included six weeks of testimony from 82 witnesses and tens of thousands of pages of documents.
The Las Vegas Valley currently gets 90 percent of its water from the Colorado River by way of Lake Mead. Authority officials insist the community needs a back-up supply and the pipeline can be developed without harming the environment.
The groundwater applications now under consideration were originally submitted by the Las Vegas Valley Water District as part of a mass filing in 1989, two years before the authority was formed to serve as the region's wholesale water supplier.
Monday's news conference was held in a parking lot on Main Street, within sight of the water authority's downtown headquarters.
"I make the argument all the time that we don't need this water. We have a safe, reliable source of water in the Colorado River if we use it wisely," Rake said over the din of tour helicopters and traffic on the nearby street.
He and others said the project threatens to ravage the environment and cost upwards of $15 billion, a price that will be paid by water customers and other taxpayers.
"In such tough economic times, it's outrageous that such a boondoggle would go forward," said Marie Logan, Nevada organizer for the national advocacy group Food & Water Watch.
Added state Assemblyman Joe Hogan, D-Las Vegas: "We hate to see our precious resources diverted to something that's going to cause more problems than it solves."
Small-business owner Heather Fisher came to the press conference with her 3-month-old daughter, Sequoia. She and her husband started their bicycle and outdoor adventure tour company 20 years ago, and they don't see the point in paying higher taxes and water bills for a project that could devastate some of the wild places where they take their clients, she said.
"We have to look to the future instead of a 25-year-old plan that maybe doesn't apply today," Fisher said.
The pipeline project has the support of the cities of Las Vegas, Henderson and North Las Vegas, the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce, the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, and numerous gaming, construction and labor organizations.
In the end, though, public input will take a back seat to the real backbone of the case, said water authority spokesman J.C. Davis.
"I think it's good that people are being given the opportunity to comment," he said, "but ultimately the state engineer makes his decision based on science and the law."
The Nevada Division of Water Resources will accept written public input on the Southern Nevada Water Authority's groundwater project until 5 p.m. Friday.
Comments should be addressed to Susan Joseph-Taylor, Chief Hearing Officer, Office of the State Engineer, 901 S. Stewart St., Suite 2002, Carson City, NV 89701.
The state engineer will not consider any email submissions.
Pipeline opponents set up an email account, greeninvegas@gmail.com, about a month ago to collect comments on the project.
Logan said any emails sent to that address by Wednesday afternoon will be printed out and delivered to Carson City by Friday's deadline.
Contact reporter Henry Brean at hbrean@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0350.
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
How's the drain pipe at the bottom of Lake Mead going? This is what is going to happen with the pipeline times 100. Its all about power, money, politics and the good old boy (girl) system that ran us in the ground.
I think Las Vegas would be making a mistake in dismissing the environment, the livelihood of Northern Nevada ranchers and farmers, and even its own future if the pipeline is allowed to be built. It seems that we forget that Las Vegas is not the center of the Nevada ‘universe’ but there is an entire state that we need to be aware of and not damage for everyone else. There are other ways to supply our water besides drawing down the water tables in Northern Nevada. The amount of money this project would cost us both in higher taxes and water bills and in a loss to our environment is not worth what would be most likely a very short-term benefit. I think we need to continue to work on limiting our water consumption and to build on our reclamation programs in order to make the best possible use of the water resources we have.
forget about a pipeline up north. We should have a building moratorium which will conserve water by not wasting is on cement, stucco and watering down dust for new homes we don't need.
Even with an alleged pipeline, the results are unknown. So we would have spent money for nothing. It was a mistake to buy here anyway since they will have to charge so much for water that it will be not be affordable when it becomes scarce. whats your house worth then? 15yr or 30yr note, will that be bailed out by government?
I find it interesting that the private link to which emails may be sent, greeninlasvegas@gmail.com has crashed or has been hacked. Emails sent to that address today simply come back as undeliverable. Strange.