News

'Structural changes' urged to boost state economy

  • Steven Horsford, Senate leader

By ED VOGEL
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL CAPITAL BUREAU
Posted: Sep. 7, 2010 | 11:54 a.m.
Updated: Sep. 8, 2010 | 7:49 a.m.

CARSON CITY -- Nevada should strive to secure federal grants and venture capital to bolster its sagging economy, according to a draft report prepared for a group appointed by legislators to look at the state's future.

It does not make any mention of a need to increase taxes.

The report, prepared by the economic research group Moody's Analytics, will be approved, rejected or amended Friday by the 20-member Nevada Vision Stakeholders Group.

There was speculation that the Vision Stakeholders Group, appointed by legislators, would propose tax increases such as a corporate income tax or propose expanding the sales tax to include now-untaxed services. The Legislature faces a potential $3 billion revenue shortfall when it convenes next February.

Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford, D-Las Vegas, said after this year's special session in February that he planned to use recommendations from the Vision Stakeholders group and Moody's Analytics as a blueprint at the 2011 Legislature.

But there is scant mention of taxes in the draft proposal.

"Tight state and local budgets notwithstanding, now is the time to make the structural changes and investments Nevada needs, lest its obstacles become insurmountable in the years ahead," the "Facing the Future" draft report said in its introduction.

The term "structural changes" has become a code phrase for increasing taxes. But the report does not go on to mention any specific taxes or assert that taxes should be increased.

Instead it stresses the need for improving education, such as increasing the number of high school and college graduates, and for building freeways connecting Las Vegas with Phoenix and Reno.

"They are proposing broad areas of spending without revenues to back it up," said Geoff Lawrence, a fiscal analyst with the conservative Nevada Policy Research Institute. "It is implying a large tax increase."

Lawrence noted the report recommends a freeway to Phoenix, a step that would cost hundreds of million in federal money, but Nevada lacks the ability to compel the U.S. government to give it necessary construction funding.

The report, he said, also wants Nevada to drive less and use alternative forms of transportation when at the same time it is calling for construction of new freeways.

"There are no specifics," he added. "They just name the goals but offer no clues on how to get there."

Lawrence doubts the Vision Stakeholders Group will propose tax increases when it meets on Friday.

"If you increase the tax burden, you hamper the private sector's ability to engage in a recovery," he said. "It's a Catch-22."

Lorne Malkiewich, the Legislature's chief administrator, said the report was developed by Moody's Analytics staff members, who have served as advisers at all Vision Stakeholder's meetings.

Moody's was hired by the Legislature for $253,000 last year to work with the group and to carry out a tax analysis and propose recommendations for changes to the state's tax structure.

But the group failed to make a June deadline for completing the tax report or to reach agreement with legislative leaders for extra time and money.

As the result, Moody's will be paid $99,000 for its work with the Vision Stakeholders Group.

Assembly Majority Leader John Oceguera, D-Las Vegas, said the report offers a good way to open discussions on what Nevada needs to do to make a better future for citizens.

"We need to improve education and to diversify the economy," he said. "We have a great business climate. Improving the quality of life is important."

He added it was a "shame" that Moody's did not finish its look at the tax structure.

Key to improving Nevada over the next 20 years, according to the draft report, is diversifying the economy and attracting clean-energy producers.

Nevada's dependence on tourism is over, the report said.

But the state's long-term growth still is expected to exceed the national average.

"Nevada's relative cost advantage, its hospitable culture, and its vast natural beauty will continue to attract migrants, mitigating shifts in demand for its core industries. Yet population gains, while still significant, will not match the trend of the last 30 years. Residential, retail and hotel construction will therefore no longer be a primary driver of regional growth."

A key recommendation calls for the state to pick up more federal grants. The report said Nevada in fiscal 2009 ranked last in the nation in per capita federal spending on specific grants at $973. The national average was $1,672.

"This is not to suggest that Nevada should depend entirely on federal resources, only that it should take advantage of available resources whenever appropriate."

Moody's proposed Nevada set a goal to acquire at least $300 million a year in venture capital investments by 2030, which would be half of the average for Western states in 2000.

"By increasing venture capital and expanding the use of federal grant money, Nevada can expand private-public research and technology transfer, helping the state to attract high-growth industries."

Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3900.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. Kilgore.Trout Sep. 8, 2010 | 3:57 p.m. Report Abuse

    @Tony.Wright...great idea. I'm sure Bernie Madoff and his ilk hate all those burdensome regulations...as do the good corporate citizens at BP. Not to mention the "little" things in which government interferes, like speed limits or drunken driving laws that plague us all.
    Your suggestion that excelling is what people do best is pollyannish...otherwise, anarchy would result in utopia.
    And to suggest that the way out is "simple" sends Occum spinning in his grave. Extremely complex problems generally require complex solutions. I realize that doesn't meet the qualifications for far right talking points, but it's just the way the world works.

  2. PCScipio Sep. 8, 2010 | 7:52 a.m. Report Abuse

    I like the cut regulations part. I've got a boatload of Goldman stock because I know the Republicans are going to sweep in November. You've got to be flexible, right?

  3. Tony.Wright Sep. 8, 2010 | 6:41 a.m. Report Abuse

    The way out is simple, cut taxes, cut spending, cut regulations. Get government out of the way and let the People do what they do best, excel.

    Renostarman - you need help.

  4. renostarman Sep. 8, 2010 | 4:59 a.m. Report Abuse

    IF YOU LIKE REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH – VOTE FOR SHARRON ANGLE the baggers love the rich getting richer.

  5. renostarman Sep. 8, 2010 | 4:57 a.m. Report Abuse

    Hey teaparty: What about all the Marxist Islamic terrorist's crossing the border to drop anchor babies? They will no doubt, be raised by Liberal Hispanic commie lesbians, to vote liberal, And be pro-choice? And they might not go to a church you approve of! Boy Howdy! The teaparty can't let that happen! You guys ought to get down to the border quick-or to the maternity wards; ya show some of that true teaparty patriotism and go raid some maternity wards-go help America.

  6. renostarman Sep. 8, 2010 | 4:54 a.m. Report Abuse

    GARYD anchor babies? really babies are bring us down? right!

  7. Richmond Sep. 8, 2010 | 2:39 a.m. Report Abuse

    More than 1,000 state and local government employees in Nevada are compensated over $200,000 per year, and to more than 10,000 employees the taxpayers here pay over $100,000 per year.

    Look it up at: transparentnevada.com/salaries/all/?page=1

    All of this in the midst of the worst recession in history. Thank you unions and the politicians who are in their pockets. Let’s raise taxes during the next legislative session.

  8. Boog Sep. 7, 2010 | 10:56 p.m. Report Abuse

    You need to start thinking deeper, Deep. Sen. Reid has decried the unwillingness of the state legislature to spend enough to qualify for Federal matching funds in targeted areas. That money has been divvied up among those states that were willing to do their part first and thus qualify for federal money. Neither Reid nor Angle could do anything about lack of funds until the Carson City crowd steps up. Don't hold your breath.

  9. itsumo Sep. 7, 2010 | 5:31 p.m. Report Abuse

    Did anyone think Moody's Analytics was going to tell us something we didn't want to hear? Unless the Legislature Ammends NRS 288.150 to ban the requirement that Local Governments including Schoo Districts bargain with Unions for pay and benefits, all the governments in the state will always be broke. The Federal Government just sent Millions of dollars to Nevada to hire and retain teachers. The Teachers Union wanted the money to go to raises. Lucky that the money won't but it most likely will in the future unless NRS 288.150 is ammended.

  10. PCScipio Sep. 7, 2010 | 5:17 p.m. Report Abuse

    @Milt: WRT clean energy, Schumpeter's creative destruction is painful but inevitable.

Read All Comments

Friday, May 25, 2012
Clear Clear, 64° Weather Forecast