adan wrote on December 01, 2009 06:04 PM: Rory Reid will be better than Gibbons and Sandoval. He cares about Nevadans. He is proposing policies that will revive our state economy and help our education system. If Republicans and Democrats dont want our state economy in ruins then they need to vote for this guy.

ewest wrote on November 24, 2009 07:47 AM: His father is a complete lunatic. Let's hope it doesn't run in the family.

NVObserver wrote on October 15, 2009 08:25 AM: No Rory. No Harry.

Nevadan's have been Reided to death!

Tim wrote on October 14, 2009 09:55 PM: I am a Republican and I am voting for Harry Reid.

A vote for Reid is a vote for Nevada!

Vet wrote on October 14, 2009 08:50 PM: Iraq and Afghanistan is our new V. Nam in this Century.

Just loss of Americans lives and money. While others on the less fortunate receiving end side suffer more.

The whole world is laughing at poor American Citizens. While the politicians get wealthy off the death of others.

Keep the mind on the war and not our own Country is the idea. While the politicians and lawyers destroy and steal from Americans and our way of life.

douglas wrote on October 14, 2009 06:42 PM: does anyone think that the reid whelp would contradict harry osama reid's agendas which are crippling the u.s. and the state of nevada ?

- enabling the illegal infiltrator attack on our economy [harry osama's "pre-citizens"]. look at our rising unemployment, our jammed class rooms/prisons/"free" services/gang membership/uninsured drivers. don't we have enough homegrown criminals/homeless/habitually unemployed/unemployable/illiterate/leaf blower operators that we need to wink at the continuing infestation ? when your home is invaded by mice, should you feed them, give them names and call them family ? or do you send them back from whence they came ?

- deliberately stalling the exploration and harvesting of this nation's and nevada's energy reserves. that ultimately forces american consumer dollars into islamic terrorist cells via sympathetic, financially supporting opec members. only good thing about that is the [hopefully] american manufactured prosthetic device industry gains with each improvised road side explosive attack on our deployed military. deployed in the "war is lost" iraq, and now, the "change" oaf's afghanistan. the coming, huge increase in consumer energy costs [and the cost of all consumer goods that have to be transported] will stab the taxpayers' wallets... all of them, not just those of the "> $250k a year" earners".

No R wrote on October 14, 2009 04:53 PM: ah, if only a qualified democrat would run against reid!

thanks xee!

Paul wrote on October 14, 2009 04:50 PM: Like Father like son. Save Nevada and America from the Reid's.

keith wrote on October 14, 2009 04:39 PM: When the Reid family as a group of lawyers on the hunt against Americans for profit. Stay in the political arena it is a destruction the Nevada peoples.

A "civil conspiracy" or collusion is an agreement between two or more parties to deprive a third party of legal rights or deceive a third party to obtain an illegal objective.[1] A conspiracy may also refer to a group of people who make an agreement to form a partnership in which each member becomes the agent or partner of every other member and engage in planning or agreeing to commit some act. It's not necessary that the conspirators be involved in all stages of planning or be aware of all details. Any voluntary agreement and some overt act by one conspirator in furthance of the plan are the main elements necessary to prove a conspiracy. A conspiracy may exist whether legal means are used to accomplish illegal results, or illegal means used to accomplish something legal.[2] "Even when no crime is involved, a civil action for conspiracy may be brought by the persons who were damaged."[1]

In the law of tort, the legal elements necessary to establish a civil conspiracy are substantially the same as for establishing a criminal conspiracy, i.e. there is an agreement between two or more natural persons to break the law at some time in the future or to achieve a lawful aim by unlawful means. The criminal law often requires one of the conspirators to take an overt step to accomplish the illegal act to demonstrate the reality of their intention to break the law, whereas in a civil conspiracy, an overt act towards accomplishing the wrongful goal may not be required. Etymologically, the term comes from Latin con- "with, together", and spirare "to

SamT wrote on October 14, 2009 03:22 PM: @wow: Tell everyone why you're a Reid fan.

Read All Comments