News

Rural residents oppose water pipeline at hearing

Loading the player...
  • Ed Naranjo, administrator of the Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation, breaks down in tears Friday while testifying against the Southern Nevada Water Authority's plan to pump groundwater from eastern Nevada to Las Vegas. Jason Bean/Las Vegas Review-Journal » Buy this photo

  • Members of the Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation crowd the hearing room Friday at the Legislature Building in Carson City. Jason Bean/Las Vegas Review-Journal » Buy this photo

By Henry Brean and Ed Vogel
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Posted: Oct. 8, 2011 | 1:59 a.m.
Updated: Oct. 8, 2011 | 4:55 p.m.

Dozens of American Indians and rural residents told the state engineer Friday that their culture and way of life will end if he approves the Southern Nevada Water Authority's request to pump water from eastern Nevada valleys.

Opponents attacked the multibillion dollar pipeline project as prohibitively expensive, unnecessary and potentially destructive in a way that authority officials and regulators can't -- or won't -- fix.

"We were put here, including Las Vegas people, by the creator to take care of this Earth, not to abuse it," said Ed Naranjo, administrator of the Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation. "We need to have you listen to us. Think of all the little people, the people not yet born."

"Without water there won't be anything here," added a sobbing Kathy Cole Hiatt, testifying via teleconference from Caliente. "Before my dad died he said, 'I don't know if there's heaven or if I'll be able to go there if there is, but for the last 84 years, I have been in heaven.' This land is our heritage and our souls."

They testified against the Southern Nevada Water Authority plan to build a pipeline network across more than 300 miles of eastern Nevada and pump as much as 126,000 acre-feet of groundwater to Las Vegas. That is enough, when stretched through reuse, to supply more than 425,000 homes.

The hearing on the water authority's request for unappropriated water began on Sept. 26 and is expected to conclude Nov. 18.

State Engineer Jason King will make a decision on the request by March.

Friday was the only day set aside for testimony by members of the public, and at least 90 percent of the nearly 100 people who spoke were against the project, including about one-third of the people who testified from Las Vegas.

One surprising critic was Assemblyman Joe Hogan, D-Las Vegas.

"It would be a disastrous blunder to proceed with this," Hogan said.

John Hiatt from the Southern Nevada chapter of the Audubon Society said that "the past history of water exportation is not a pretty one" and that the basins of eastern Nevada face a similar fate, regardless of any precautions taken by the state engineer.

Several people warned that once the water starts flowing and Las Vegas comes to depend on it, the spigot will never be turned off, no matter the damage.

To stop pumping, rural residents and small Nevada communities would need to file lawsuits, but they lack the money to pay for legal cases that might last for decades.

As fourth-generation Lincoln County resident and former County Commissioner Ronda Hornbeck put it: "Why is it OK to destroy one community to save another?"

Linda Johnson from the Salt Lake City League of Women Voters testified by video link from Ely, where she questioned the water authority's promises to "mitigate" any harm it might cause.

"To them, mitigation means to pay off and buy out," she said. "That's not mitigation. That's destruction."

Johnson and other Utah residents worry that large-scale groundwater pumping will dry valleys in Nevada and send dust and lingering fallout from nuclear tests blowing east as far as the Wasatch Front.

But state AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Danny Thompson made a passionate plea for King to approve the project.

Without a reliable water supply, he said from Carson City, Southern Nevada will not be able to recover from the economic crash, let alone flourish again.

"This is about more than an inter-basin transfer of water," Thompson said. "The economic viability of the state is at stake here."

About a dozen people dressed in day-glow orange T-shirts from the Laborers' International Union of North America showed up at the Las Vegas public input site to back the water project.

Representatives from the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce, homebuilders association and the resort industry offered statements of support.

Helen Foley of Pardee Homes said her family has roots in Lincoln County that stretch back to the 1860s, but she defended the authority's plan to tap a resource that is "unused and unclaimed" for the good of Southern Nevada and the state as a whole.

"It is vitally important that we be able to claim some of that water," Foley said.

But longtime White Pine County businesswoman Denys Koyle tried to turn that argument on its head. Considering how lousy and unstable its economy is, she said, "maybe Vegas isn't worth the gamble" involved in a pipeline that could wind up costing as much as $15 billion to build and finance.

"That's an Apollo moonshot, and it's going to be paid for by us ratepayers," Las Vegas environmental advocate Launce Rake said. "I call it the no-banker-left-behind act."

Longtime Baker resident Jo Anne Garrett argued that in a world with mounting food problems, it seems "obscene" to take water from working farms and ranches in eastern Nevada.

"When I hear Las Vegas referred to as the economic engine of Nevada, I'm a little disappointed," Garrett said. "I would like to be in the care of something a little bit more intelligent than an engine."

The unique aspect of Friday's input session was the presence of more than 40 Indians, many from Ibapah, Utah, and Ely, who traveled by bus for seven hours to Carson City.

During a lunch break, three Indians drummed and sang a native song that honors water.

Rather than talking about the effects of water on the economy or people, several Indian speakers pleaded with King to consider the effect of the project on animals, plants and the Earth.

Tribal member Delaine Spilsbury noted that state law directs the engineer to grant the right to use unappropriated water to the first requester.

"I think being here for 10,000 years that we ought to be first," she said.

In an interview, Southern Nevada Water Authority spokesman J.C. Davis said none of the areas where the water wholesaler wants to pump is close to Indian reservations in Nevada or Utah.

But Naranjo contended waters flow from the Snake Valley east of Great Basin National Park into the watersheds on his reservation on the Utah-Nevada line.

He and Spilsbury added the U.S. Geological Survey began a study on the inter-basin movement of water, but before it was completed stopped looking at valleys where the Goshute live.

The Goshute include Paiutes and member of the Western Shoshone tribes.

The state will accept written comments on the water authority's groundwater applications until 5 p.m. Dec. 2.

They should be addressed to Susan Joseph-Taylor, Chief Hearing Officer, Office of the State Engineer, 901 S. Stewart St., Suite 2002, Carson City, NV 89701.

No email submissions will be considered.

Contact reporter Henry Brean at hbrean@reviewjournal .com or 702-383-0350.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. docturner Oct. 10, 2011 | 11:45 a.m. Report Abuse

    I happened to be in Baker, Nevada the day that the Clark County applications were announced. A distressing day for certain. I had driven through one intermontane basin after another to get there and I was working on the hydrology of Lehman Springs in the Great Basin National Park. So, I am familiar with the demography and the geography of the area and Pat Mulroy's plan seemed reasonable provided those living in the area could be protected. In 1976, Phillips Uranium dried up Bob Bill Bicenti's artesian water well in the San Juan Basin of New Mexico. Rather than have Bob Bill Bicente stop a billion dollar uranium mine I drafted the Replacement Law and had my State Senator introduce it in the legislature. It went from a three line Bill to a much longer Bill and it took 3 years to pass. What it does is require any user of water to replace the supply of others if as a result of their use it caused impairment in the area. That kind of legislation would protect Nevadians everywhere from being dried up while fostering jobs and economic development. Would probably be supported by the gold mining industry in Nevada as well.

  2. rainwatergeek Oct. 10, 2011 | 10:14 a.m. Report Abuse

    We cannot, as a nation, allow water to become a commodity sold to the highest bidder. No one has the right to have so much that it takes away any one else's right to have enough.

    Watershed transfers are the most dangerous issues facing our fragile democracy. With corporations having been granted citizenship, it is only a matter of time before individuals are considered expendable in the pursuit of profit.

  3. SEPSIS Oct. 9, 2011 | 1:15 a.m. Report Abuse

    He said, "boondoggle". lol

  4. Scary Harry Oct. 9, 2011 | 12:14 a.m. Report Abuse

    mark_schaffer....rural residents won't be constipated when they start crappin' in your drinking water. Ha ha.

  5. Cherokee.Mankiller Oct. 8, 2011 | 12:26 p.m. Report Abuse

    This is why if I got into politics or government, I'd be the pariah... My ideas would make too much sense. There is widespread opposition to the pipeline, and I see it only as a means of the already criminal unions to further steal money. On the other hand, San Diego is willing and almost happy to pay a premium for water, including higher cost desalinated water. What not take all that money that is set to go into the pipeline, and build a desalinization plant in say, Oceanside? Make a condition of the deal is that California and Nevada exchange an equal allotment of Colorado water equal to the capacity of the plant. Say the plant can provide 500,00 acre feet a year, then Cali allots that much of their share of Colorado water to Nevada. Equal, fair, and with a willing population. But that's too easy...

  6. mark_schaffer Oct. 8, 2011 | 12:16 p.m. Report Abuse

    "Rural residents constipated at pipeline hearing" Looks like a better headline.

  7. J.Bo Oct. 8, 2011 | 11:58 a.m. Report Abuse

    This guy looks like he needs more FIBER in his diet.

  8. smcollins79 Oct. 8, 2011 | 11:46 a.m. Report Abuse

    Between Nevada Energy and the Water District Las Vegas is the joke of the nation.

  9. gbigs Oct. 8, 2011 | 10:04 a.m. Report Abuse

    the beast must be fed.

  10. Jerry S..Dickinson Oct. 8, 2011 | 8:56 a.m. Report Abuse

    There are approx. 2 million people whom will be effected by this decision. Friday was the only day allowed for public input? Ya'll know that this whole pipeline was tossed in court once already because Mulroy ignored the law about allowing public comment. It is refreshing to see how our officials are so steadfast in their desire for the public to be treated fairly. 100 hundred people present, 90 against the pipeline. Any polling group in the world would say that was a 90% against. How can anyone vote for it with those numbers against it?

Read All Comments

Friday, May 25, 2012
Clear Clear, 62° Weather Forecast