Comments (6) | Add a comment
Sandoval, Reid talk taxes, budgets in final debate
-
CATHLEEN ALLISON/SPECIAL TO THE REVIEW-JOURNAL
Brian Sandoval, left, and Rory Reid debate during the taping of the "Nevada Newsmakers" TV show in Reno on Wednesday.
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL CAPITAL BUREAU
Updated: Oct. 28, 2010 | 7:32 a.m.
CARSON CITY -- The gubernatorial candidates' sounded familiar charges in their final debate on Wednesday: Republican Brian Sandoval asserted his opponent will raise taxes; Democrat Rory Reid said Sandoval misrepresents his position.
"We don't need new taxes" Reid said. "The budget I prepared doesn't have new taxes. We agree on taxes."
Sandoval pledged to veto any tax increase passed by the Legislature and pointedly asked Reid if he would veto a budget that included new taxes.
"I have answered that question a thousand times," Reid responded. "I will advocate for my budget proposal and I will sign it into law. I am not going to do anything other than that."
Neither candidate mentioned if the Legislature approves tax increases, it already has enough votes to override a governor's veto. Both approval of tax bills and a veto override need at least a two-thirds vote in each house.
Their fourth debate, the last before Tuesday's election, was broadcast on the Reno-based "Nevada Newsmakers" TV show.
Throughout the campaign, Sandoval has maintained a double-digit lead over Reid.
Much of Wednesday's debate dealt with taxes and spending.
Reid repeatedly attacked Sandoval for not having plans to balance the state budget, improve education and revive the state economy. Sandoval countered that Reid's budget plan is a "stack of paper" because it relies of $615 million in revenue that doesn't exist, depends on $300 million to $400 million gained through efficiencies that aren't explained and takes $150 million from the Nevada Department of Transportation. That last part of the plan violates the Nevada constitution, Sandoval said.
But Reid said revenue will grow dramatically in coming years as $5 billion in renewable energy projects have been approved for Nevada. The state will become energy independent and sell excess power to California, he said.
He compared Sandoval to actor Michael J. Fox in the "Back to the Future" movies. Sandoval wants to get in a DeLorean and go back to 2007 when state spending was much less, according to Reid.
"You can't go back to 2007," Reid said.
But Sandoval said the state population has decreased since 2007 and state government needs to balance the budget without tax increases.
Since state government is expected to receive about $5.2 billion in tax revenue or the next two years, Sandoval intends to limit state spending to that amount, which is about $600 million less than the budget approved for the 2005-07 period. A $5.2 billion budget would be about $1.2 billion less than current state spending.
Some legislators have contended that the revenue shortfall facing legislators is $3 billion. That is based on their view that revenue should be $8 billion to maintain current services and expected caseload growth over the next two years.
Broadcaster Sam Shad pointed out that Las Vegas economist Jeremy Aguero told the Review-Journal on Tuesday night that rolling spending back to 2007 would be unrealistic.
"The cost of energy you can't roll back to 2007, you can't roll back health care to 2007," Aguero said.
Sandoval's repeated response to Shad was: "Reasonable people can disagree."
Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Great, Sandoval has painted himself into the same corner as Gibbons. The media and the conservatives will hold him to the no new taxes pledge. He is going to be playing the same silly games that Gibbons did and probably have about the same kind of relationship with the Legislature. Just Great. This is not what I want to see.
Where in the heck did Rory get in excess of six million dollars to run for this position? I'll bet from daddy's special interest groups. It would be nice if Rory showed up to work once in a while, especially to resign. He and his ilk are holding back Clark County from recovering. A dream team of Rory and Harry continuing to screw things up in unthinkable. Vote all the career politicians out.
Rory Reid is a "JOKE" --- just like his beyond "STUPID DADDY HARRY" --------------- All Reid's -- "GO AWAY - PLEASE !!!" ----- Stop hurting Nevada // Stop hurting the Country.
well Sandoval seems to admit that the HUGE increase in gov and taxes in Nevada last legislative session was WRONG and will probably use 07 figures to set a budget. But this requires cutting back on over paid public unions. AND THEY SHOULD BE CUT ALL THE WAY TO THE PRIVATE SECTOR RATE by admiting bankruptcy and ending FOREVER the crooked deal of public officials setting public union wages. IT IS SIMPLE Nevada should pay the national average/ private sector AND NOT A PENNY MORE forever.
Politicos will sell you out because they are crooks.
I wonder why Rory keeps campaigning, he should be updating his resume and looking for a job. Qualifications: Son of Senate majority leader, watched Clark County slide into bankruptcy while chairman of the Commission, Candidate for Governor, lied about Brian Sandoval . . . hope he can say: "Do you want fries with that?"
Rory is NOT CAPABLE of any public office least talking about governorship. MY VOTE GOES TO BRIAN SANDOVAL