Comments (58) | Add a comment
Sandoval signs transgender job discrimination bill
Tools
REVIEW-JOURNAL CAPITAL BUREAU
CARSON CITY -- Job, housing and public accommodation discrimination against transgender people will be illegal in Nevada starting Oct. 1.
Breaking ranks with all but a few legislative Republicans, Gov. Brian Sandoval on Tuesday signed into law a bill that prohibits job discrimination against transgender people.
And the bill's primary sponsor said the governor also has pledged to sign two other legislative-approved bills that will outlaw such discrimination in public accommodations, such as hotels, restaurants and stores, and in the rental or sale of housing or property.
Assembly Bill 211 was signed in a ceremony attended by transgender activists and the bill's primary sponsors, Assemblyman Paul Aizley, D-Las Vegas, and Sens. David Parks, D-Las Vegas, and Sheila Leslie, D-Reno.
Under the bill, employers cannot discriminate against people based on their gender "identity or expression." However, employers could require appropriate workplace clothing and grooming standards that are consistent with their preferred gender.
Transgender men and women are those who identify with or express behavior associated with the gender that is opposite to the one given them at birth. Some have gone through sex change operations and many have undergone hormone replacement treatments.
A regulation approved last year by the state Department of Motor Vehicles allows transgender people with written authorization from doctors to change the gender mark on their drivers' licenses.
During hearings in the Legislature, transgender people said the bills were intended to apply to people who consistently live a transgender lifestyle, not to occasional cross-dressers.
The law makes it illegal "to fail to hire or to fire or otherwise discriminate" against transgender people. Only employers with 15 or more employees will be subject to the law. Transgender people can file complaints with the Nevada Equal Rights Commission if they believe they suffered job discrimination. The commission would determine if their complaints are valid.
Nevada is an "at will" state where employers usually do not need to give a reason to hire or fire employees, unless the employee is covered by a labor agreement. But Nevada law also prevents job discrimination based on a person's color, race, sex, religion, age, disability or national origin. Now "gender identity or expression" is being added to that list.
Aizley said the governor also has promised to sign the two other transgender bills, Senate Bill 331 and Senate Bill 368, once they reach his desk, perhaps as early as today .
Parks, the primary sponsor of the 1999 law that outlawed job discrimination against gays and lesbians, said Nevada has a "proud history" of protecting the personal liberty of all its citizens.
"It is wrong to discriminate against people for characteristics that harm no one else and that are a legitimate expression of their sense of self," said Parks about AB211. "It is harmful to society to deprive such individuals of the ability to earn a living, find housing, to use stores, restaurants and other facilities and live free of fear."
Leslie said Nevada is a tourism state, and once all three bills are signed, all visitors should feel comfortable they are welcome and wanted in the Silver State.
"Equal rights isn't a partisan issue," she said. "I am not surprised he (Sandoval) is standing up for equal rights."
Republicans such as Assemblyman Ira Hansen of Sparks and James Settelmeyer of Minden had questioned how the state could force employers to hire people they did not want on their payrolls.
Hansen, a plumbing company owner, questioned whether a transgender person could be accepted by his customers as a plumber. Settelmeyer said he did not like the idea of a person who might be born a male walking into a restroom occupied by his two daughters.
Sandoval made few comments other than congratulating people during a brief signing ceremony in his office. At one point, American Civil Liberties Union lobbyist Rebecca Gasca, who testified for the bill, quipped that Sandoval should draw a happy face next to his signature.
Of the 37 Democrats in the Legislature, only Sen. John Lee of North Las Vegas voted against the bill. Only four of the 26 Republicans voted for it.
Washington state had about 50 cases of transgender discrimination a year after it passed a similar bill. Fourteen states now outlaw job discrimination against transgender people.
During hearings, activists testified that the unemployment rate among transgender people is two or three times the overall rate, even though many transgender people are highly qualified.
Lauren Scott, a leader of Equality Nevada and a transgender Reno businesswoman, does not expect that many discrimination cases will be filed as a result of the new law because most employers simply will stop discrimination.
Jane Heenan, a transgender activist who is a marriage and family therapist in Las Vegas, said she felt like Sisyphus in Greek mythology who was forced to push a boulder up a mountain continually only to have it roll back down.
"Now it is staying up there," she said. "I am so proud of so many people who will feel a sense of empowerment, a sense of belonging and a sense that I am part of this community. We're alienated so often, and yet there are people who treated us seriously."
Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Not that many jobs Brian. You promised us jobs. Where are they? You have failed.
SO, Vegas Duuuuuuude. Which part of this conversation is funny? The part where people are discriminated against by small-minded morons, or the part where I suggested a group of transgendered people could get sick of being harassed and gang up to beat someone up? Actually nevermind. You're probably the kind of person who thought Sharon Angle was a great candidate. God only knows what kind of crap you find funny.
Thanks "Native LV" - I needed that laugh!
blogspot is losing it. That last post had nothing whatsoever to do with the issue at hand. This issue concerns an established medical condition with clearly defined standards of care. Nobody in the government is connected with the diagnosis in any way shape or form. Ah well, if it keeps blogspot occupied and out of mischief.....
A *political* condition diagnosed for political purposes.
Soviet (communist) doctors used to "diagnose" (charge) those who disagreed with their county's social system (a product of "genius", as they used to call it) as being mentally ill. The result was that political opponents were condemned to Soviet mental hospitals where they endured all sorts of unspeakable "rehabilitations".
The Psycho-Liberal complex in *this* country has their own version of this trap going on.
This gentleman is where mob rule democracy get’s into trouble, as it does use the power of government to discriminate against the people. It does this by giving some people more rights, and the privilege to be more equal than the next guy.
It is only the Government that by law cannot discriminate. The idea that we are all equal under the law embodies that ideal. Our individual natural rights are not encumbered as we do not use the levers of power, of a government. And if we do have access to the levers of power of government, they cannot be used, in any way, to discriminate against any person.
Somebody told me Gary D beats his wife. Does anybody know if this is true???
I have a strong suspicion that if one of these negative posters used the term "he/she" or "it" in a crowd of transgendered people - which is within your right of free speech to do - that, after the bruises from the violent attack you'd encounter were healed, you all would be lobbying for laws to protect you against just those types of attacks. But you're right, free speech includes every idiotic, unenlightened, paranoid and fear-driven statement you could make. Again, what it does NOT give you the right to do is to prevent someone from holding a job or in any other way impeeding their right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Don't you just hate it when then constitution itself, which is constantly quoted by conservatives, doesn't back you up???
Just to drive home the absurdity of this, I think all men should show up to work in dresses and high heels, and all women in a man’s three piece power suit, and wing tip shoes. That way, no transgender cross dresser person will ever be harassed. Personally, I think a Kilt, worn in the best Scott tradition should work just fine.