Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


Single trial requested for suspects in fraud case

Federal prosecutors filed a motion Wednesday that seeks to consolidate the fraud trials of a spine surgeon, a personal injury lawyer and a medical consultant.

"Simply put, there is no reason to have three separate trials of the same conspiracy, the same named co-conspirators, and the same set of operative facts," prosecutors wrote. "The interests of the victims, the witnesses, the jurors, the court, and the community support consolidation."


Most Popular Stories
  • 'YOU DON'T BLOW A BUNCH OF CASH IN VEGAS ...': Obama remark reopens wound
  • NORM: Ad's Strip scenes raised eyebrows
  • LAUGHLIN EDGEWATER: Two dead in casino car crash
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Former commander of USS Cole considers run against Reid
  • NORM: $1 million wager on Super Bowl approved
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • IMAGES FROM 1860S: Photos show historic Nevada
  • Fighter battles rare disease that shatters mixed martial arts dream
  • Flood advisory for Las Vegas Valley




  • A trial for Dr. Mark Kabins is scheduled to start Nov. 3, but no trial date has been scheduled for attorney Noel Gage and consultant Howard Awand since an appeals court reinstated their criminal cases in August.

    "At this time, I do not believe that consolidation is practical or a realistic possibility," said attorney David Chesnoff, who represents Kabins.

    Los Angeles attorney Harland Braun, who represents Awand, said he will not object to consolidation, but Gage said he will "vigorously" oppose it.

    Gage and Awand were indicted together in May 2007, and Senior U.S. District Judge Justin Quackenbush of Spokane, Wash., later separated their cases over an objection from the government. "The court did so because Awand had requested more time to prepare for trial while Gage demanded a prompt trial," prosecutors wrote in the motion to consolidate.

    Prosecutors allege Gage and Awand conspired to cheat injured clients by inflating medical costs, protecting doctors from malpractice lawsuits and sharing kickbacks from legal settlements. Gage's case produced a mistrial in March 2008 after jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict.

    Quackenbush, who presided over Gage's trial in Las Vegas, later dismissed the charges against Gage and Awand after prosecutors refused to grant limited immunity to Kabins, described at the time as a target of the fraud investigation.

    Kabins was indicted in March on conspiracy and fraud charges, and his case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Jones.

    "The indictments are considerably different," Gage said. He also said that he has been acquitted of most of the charges involving Awand.

    The motion for a consolidated trial was filed under both case numbers, so it is unclear whether Jones or Quackenbush will rule on the matter. It is also unclear which judge would preside over the trial if the cases were joined.

    Contact reporter Carri Geer Thevenot at cgeer@reviewjournal.com or 702-384-8710.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Mr. Justice wrote on October 01, 2009 05:46 PM: I will be SHOCKED if David Chesnoff actually goes to, and completes, this trial. SHOCKED.


    how does this work ? wrote on October 01, 2009 12:12 PM:
    lets say i own a harrahs type hotel and i remodel the place without permits and violate a great deal of laws, and risk the lives of customers and employee's while doing so with total disregard to anyone but my self and my stock holders.
    the best plan for me is to find a scapegoat, and transfer blame to them, and never repair the building code violations and asbestosis exposure to all who visited my hotels during the construction ,while i was hiding a scam ?


    Too_many_laws wrote on October 01, 2009 08:15 AM: There go those crazy US Attorneys again. Insurance fraud is a *state* crime. If I stage a very expensive auto accident at Whiskey Pete's, and mail a claim to my auto insurance company 100 yards across the state line, does this qualify as a federal crime? Mail fraud? What a joke. Manufactured jurisdiction.

    Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the way I see it, there is nothing wrong with simulating a crash in Nevada. The *crime* is submitting a fraudulent insurance claim to cash-in. That is, the fraud (crime) occurs in CALIFORNIA, and Jerry Brown should take the case.