Sick of TS wrote on November 07, 2009 08:33 AM: Dina Taxes is at it again, breaking her promise not raise taxes.She also said she would not vote for the Healthcare bill only 3. I am an independant and voted for her last year. I want someone new. I'm voting for that Lauer guy you ran a story about last month. He's seems independant.

lester wrote on October 22, 2009 09:08 AM: Would you ask Dina if she supports the voucher system for our schools since she supports public and private options in health care? Why not the same for our school systems?

PJ wrote on October 21, 2009 03:01 AM: I gave up my health insurance after my real estate sales plunged and I could no longer afford to pay for my plan. I did however find a discount healthcare program. I save up to 60% on medical and dental expenses. If you don't have health insurance or are underinsured, the toll-free numbers to call for more info or to sign up are 866-944-3706 or 866-943-4683.

Had Enough wrote on October 21, 2009 01:38 AM: HELEN, I agree with you. thank you

HELEN WEILS wrote on October 20, 2009 05:23 PM: AS MUCH AS I HATE DINA TITUS, SHE HAS RESPONDED TO EVERY EMAIL I'VE SENT.
SCORE ONE FOR HER. I'M STILL VOTING AGAINST HER.
NOW LET'S GO TO HARRY REID. NOT ONLY DOESN'T HE ANSWER HIS EMAILS, HE DOESN'T ANSWER HIS PHONES. HE PUTS YOU TO A VOICE MAIL THAT LASTS 10 SECONDS.
WHAT A CON!!!

Cinda Dillahunt wrote on October 20, 2009 04:37 PM: I think there is a whole plethora of misinformation out there regarding health care reform. We need to stop the premium disparity between big & small businesses; we need to eliminate the preexisting condition clause; we need to allow competition in the market place; and, the public option is one way to accomplish all three. The key word is option and having an affordable option will help drive the price of premiums down. The preexisting condition clause is abhorrent as most people over the age of 55 have had some sort of ailment in their lifetime that can be considered preexisting, making the preexisting condition clause discriminatory at the very least. Health care reform currently before our lawmakers seems predicated on oversight and the insurance giants, like banking, have been allowed to write their own rules to the detriment of the American people for way too long. It's time to reign in health care costs while allowing all Americans affordable health care coverage. This isn't about party or politics, it's about reforming a 19th century system and bringing that system into the 21st century. Health care reform is necessary, needed and must be passed for all of us and for future generations.

the man wrote on October 20, 2009 04:21 PM: Yes, costs "should" go down. After they strip everybody of their rights to actual medical care. Longer waits, fewer doctors, fewer clinics and fewer hospitals will all help in keeping the costs down.

Of course, if you claim to be a terrorist or an illegal, than they move you to the private section where you get first rate medical care and every thing catered to your needs at absolutely no charge to you.

Had Enough wrote on October 20, 2009 03:43 PM: The problem is all too many Americans (and all too many illegals) want their health care (house payment, food, cash for clunkers, college tuition, etc, etc) given to them free of charge, and paid by "someone else". My problem is that I (and my kids, and their kids) are in the "someone else" group, and don't want to pay for these other people's lifestyles; AT THE POINT OF A GUN (IE. IRS collected taxes).

Who's gonna win this tug of war?

Too_many_Socialists wrote on October 20, 2009 02:43 PM: Hey, Dina. We'll take YOUR health insurance and retirement plans.

Frank M. Pelteson wrote on October 20, 2009 02:01 PM: Can you understand why Representative Dina Titus, Democrat, Third District of Nevada, famous for her a Political Science Professorship at UNLV, would have accepted an invitation to have her Town Hall Meeting on Government Health Care in a Jewish House of God, Temple Ner Tamid, in Henderson?

Aside from the unconstitutionality of Federal health legislation, doesn't this event venue border on violating the First Amendment, which states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion . . . ?"

Are we to get the perception that Temple ner Tamid might be misconstrued to be a government office?

Read All Comments