News

Two men charged in slot plot

  • Andre Nestor
    Suspect

By BRIAN HAYNES
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Posted: Jan. 5, 2011 | 6:46 p.m.
Updated: Jan. 6, 2011 | 10:02 a.m.

Two men face federal conspiracy charges in a scheme that exploited a software glitch to inflate jackpot payouts on video poker machines in Las Vegas and beyond.

John Kane, 52, and Andre Nestor, 39, were charged Monday in federal court in Las Vegas with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with the scheme, which netted at least $429,000.

In early 2009, Kane, of Las Vegas, discovered a way to exploit a video poker machine through a rarely used feature that must be enabled by casino attendants, according to the criminal complaint.

With the feature enabled, Kane played video poker at the minimum bet until he hit a jackpot. Then, using the feature, he changed his wager to the maximum bet and inflated the payout, according to the complaint filed by the FBI.

The complaint does not name any casinos or the brand of the machine in question.

After Kane's "test run" in Las Vegas, Nestor arrived from Pennsylvania, and together they used the scheme to take inflated jackpots in May and June 2009, the complaint said.

Nestor took what he learned home to the Meadows Racetrack and Casino near Pittsburgh, authorities alleged.

During a visit to that casino in June 2009, Nestor posed as a high roller, arriving with a former police officer posing as his bodyguard, according to Washington County, Pa., court records.

Nestor found a Draw Poker machine made by Reno-based International Game Technology and persuaded a slot technician to activate the machine's Double Up feature.

The technician obliged, but a supervisor overruled him because the change required gaming board approval, according to the records.

But when the technician disabled the feature, he forgot to save the change, leaving the feature active for Nestor.

Over the next two months, Nestor collected 61 video poker jackpots totaling $429,945, according to the court records.

Gaming authorities first suspected wrongdoing in late August 2009 when a Nestor associate tried to sign for a jackpot Nestor had just won. Within three days, investigators had uncovered the scheme. Nestor and two associates were indicted by a Washington County grand jury a month later.

Steven Toprani, Washington County's district attorney, said he was in touch with federal authorities while his case moved toward trial.

As Nestor's trial was about to start Monday, federal agents showed up with an arrest warrant and took him away in handcuffs.

"It looks like this certainly was larger than a thief in Washington County," said Toprani, who said he was told the thefts could top $1 million.

Nestor is being brought to Las Vegas to face the federal charge. Kane was arrested in Las Vegas and appeared in court Tuesday.

Jerry Markling, chief of enforcement for the Nevada Gaming Control Board, said his agency began investigating Kane in the summer of 2009, but when the investigation grew to include other jurisdictions, the FBI took over.

Though not uncommon, the scam is not something investigators see all the time, Markling said.

It was unclear how Kane learned of the glitch. A player can stumble onto a glitch, but one also can be discovered by a dedicated slot cheat who buys a machine and experiments to find vulnerabilities, Markling said.

"If you have a machine and you have long enough to experiment, you might be able to find a glitch like this," he said.

IGT, which makes about half of the slot machines used in the United States, did not respond to requests for comment.

David G. Schwartz, director of the Center for Gaming Research at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, said the case shows how slot cheats have adapted to new technology over the years.

"As the machines change, the cheating technology changes," he said. "Obviously this guy found a back door."

Contact reporter Brian Haynes at bhaynes@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0281.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. przecinek Jan. 21, 2011 | 4:12 a.m. Report Abuse

    Seems it's the technician that is to blame (since he forgot, or maybe "forgot", to disable the feature as he was told to do).

  2. przecinek Jan. 21, 2011 | 4:11 a.m. Report Abuse

    Seems it's the technician that is to blame (since he forgot, or maybe "forgot", to disable the feature as he was told to do).

    www.polskiebonusy.pl

  3. alwaysright Jan. 7, 2011 | 1:08 a.m. Report Abuse

    Damn why couldn't I think of that?

  4. Anya Jan. 6, 2011 | 12:15 p.m. Report Abuse

    Well written article and interesting details.

  5. Borg45 Jan. 6, 2011 | 10:09 a.m. Report Abuse

    If he did nothing to tamper with the machine, and only took advantage of a glitch he found in the machine, this charge should be thrown out. The players put up with every falsely represented or sneaky representation of the rules of table games and slots and that is legal, so why should this be illegal? The casinos say sit your dumb a** down, lose your money or get lucky, and get out. If you use your brain you're outa here.

  6. VegasDude2010 Jan. 6, 2011 | 9:24 a.m. Report Abuse

    Good for him. If he wasn't so greedy, he wouldn't have got caught. What a dumb asssssssssss.

  7. homer Jan. 6, 2011 | 9:06 a.m. Report Abuse

    Kent You are wrong. As long as the player did not alter the machine then the casinos will lose this one.

    The Rampart Casino has intentionally manipulated thier machines to payout less and that to is not illegal. As long as the computer chips are approved by the Gaming Control Board then it is not illegal. The mystery is why would players contiue to play there?

  8. MGH Jan. 6, 2011 | 8:27 a.m. Report Abuse

    Not guilty...the casino's are the one's cheating. Just look at the casino being built...Are you trying to tell me they got there by no illegal means..good for them if they found an edge on these godforsaken places.

  9. Big Julie Jan. 6, 2011 | 7:47 a.m. Report Abuse

    Too bad he got greedy,he could have had a nice thing going,but I guess he wanted it all at once.

  10. James.Wilson Jan. 6, 2011 | 7:46 a.m. Report Abuse

    Wonder if this was the same scam a tech used at the Orleans? Sounds like it.

Read All Comments

Saturday, May 26, 2012
Partly Sunny Partly Sunny, 58° Weather Forecast