News

UNLV chief outlines changes for university

  • JOHN GURZINSKI/LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL

    UNLV President Neal Smatresk speaks Tuesday at Ham Hall. Predicting more changes and budget cuts, he said, "We hope there will be a light at the end of the tunnel after that." » Buy this photo

By RICHARD LAKE
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Posted: Sep. 15, 2010 | 12:00 a.m.
Updated: Sep. 15, 2010 | 7:29 a.m.

The theme in higher education this year is change.

Change has come in the past few years because of budget cuts, and much more change is to come.

UNLV President Neal Smatresk expanded on that theme Tuesday in his annual State of the University address.

The university wants to change what it charges students in high-demand programs. It wants state lawmakers to change how the state's universities and colleges are funded. And it expects to change into a smaller, better institution.

Smatresk, who has been president since June 2009 after serving two years as provost, said the last several years had been challenging. He said the university was down $50 million in state funding, a full 27 percent of its budget, since 2007.

"It's not over," Smatresk told a crowd of several hundred faculty, staff and students gathered on campus. He said cuts probably will continue through the next two years.

"We hope there will be a light at the end of the tunnel after that," he said.

Before Smatresk spoke, James Dean Leavitt, chairman of the Board of Regents, told the crowd that the state's elected leaders and political candidates were not facing up to reality. The state cannot fix its problems without more revenue, he said.

"You don't have any business in public office unless you're willing to tell the truth," Leavitt said.

He said he wanted more candor from the candidates about how they would fix the state's problems. Cutting higher education makes no sense, he said. Education should be seen as a way out of the economic problems, he said.

"There isn't a single NSHE (Nevada System of Higher Education) institution that's properly funded," he said. "Let's make that clear when we go into the legislative session."

Smatresk said he applauded the Board's decision last month to ask the state to maintain its current funding. Gov. Jim Gibbons had asked state agencies to submit budgets with 10 percent cuts for the next fiscal cycle. The Board instead asked for a small increase.

He said state higher education leaders will advocate that the Legislature rewrite the formula used to fund the state's eight higher education institutions.

He said UNLV adds value to the community. As an example, he said out-of-state students have a $250 million economic impact locally every year.

A top priority for the next year will be maintaining current staff levels, he said.

In addition, the university will begin to implement differential tuition, which got formal Board approval earlier this month. Some programs -- the most popular, most expensive -- are expected to begin charging students more next year to help pay for themselves.

Smatresk said he will create several task forces to focus on developing a new general education plan, on marketing, branding and recruiting, and on employee benefits, among several other things.

He closed his address by lamenting a state funding formula that has historically rewarded growth.

The more an institution grows its enrollment, the more money it gets. Typically, this means freshmen and sophomore classes with more students end up paying for smaller, more intense upper division classes.

But Smatresk said it is very difficult for a university to compete with a community college and a state college for students when it charges two or three times as much.

A better model, he said, would be to shrink the university a little and improve upper division and graduate education so students will want to come to UNLV because of its quality.

Contact Richard Lake at rlake@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0307.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. Marcus Sep. 15, 2010 | 12:56 p.m. Report Abuse

    "Of course he would still want a bigger piece of the budget pie. His real goal, as stated, is to retain all members of his empire. He is actually got a great game going. Now if he could figure out how to keep playing without all those pesky students"

    And think how happy casino owners would be if they retain their 'empires' for their 'great game' without all those 'pesky gamblers'. These posts don't even make sense. Rightwing paranoids will need to use a little mental elbow grease if this is going to be any fun at all for everyone else.

  2. Marcus Sep. 15, 2010 | 12:52 p.m. Report Abuse

    "Until you let us know about these two, how you fired them, suspended, or are cutting the budget beginng with these clowns"

    Because the quality of American education is measured by how obedient we all are to fascist bumpkins who demand censorship of anything that cramps their self-congratulatory fantasies.

  3. hdstmf Sep. 15, 2010 | 11:43 a.m. Report Abuse

    Hmmm. As I understand this edurat's plan the goal is to increase tuition and fees while fighting to keep the money instead of passing it to the general fund. Of course he would still want a bigger piece of the budget pie. His real goal, as stated, is to retain all members of his empire. He is actually got a great game going. Now if he could figure out how to keep playing without all those pesky students...

  4. desertrat Sep. 15, 2010 | 6:08 a.m. Report Abuse

    "A better model, he said, would be to shrink the university a little and improve upper division and graduate education so students will want to come to UNLV because of its quality." Then reinstate the graduate programs you already cut leaving some post master's degree students applying out of state! Arizona will be getting my $40,000 when I would have much rather stayed home and attended UNLV.

  5. Amen Sep. 14, 2010 | 11:53 p.m. Report Abuse

    Neal Smatresk:

    We want to know what you did to those two socialist, communist tenured professors who wrote that scathing attack in the RJ on Las Vegas about four or five months back. Until you let us know about these two, how you fired them, suspended, or are cutting the budget beginng with these clowns, etc., we do not see you. Understand? Just save the spin, man.

Saturday, May 26, 2012
Partly Sunny Partly Sunny, 58° Weather Forecast