Comments (15) | Add a comment
Water pipeline plan draws flood of letters
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Updated: Dec. 6, 2011 | 8:44 a.m.
A state board and a Clark County commissioner are among the thousands of groups and individuals who went on the record last week to oppose the Southern Nevada Water Authority's pipeline plan.
State Engineer Jason King estimates he received about 23,000 letters about the project by Friday's deadline for public comment.
Based on what he has read so far, "about 99 percent" of the letters are in opposition to the pipeline, King said.
"A lot came in late Friday afternoon," Nevada's top water regulator said Monday. "My inbox was filled this morning."
The water authority is seeking state permission to tap groundwater across eastern Nevada and pump it to Las Vegas through a multibillion-dollar pipeline more than 300 miles long.
King is expected to rule on most of the groundwater applications tied to the project by late March.
He said he received letters from across the state and around the world. "Some of them are form letters. A lot of them aren't," he said.
The bulk of the letters -- 21,063 in all -- came on a single computer disk sent to the state engineer by the Center for Biological Diversity, a national conservation group based in Tucson, Ariz. The group sent an action alert to members worldwide urging them to weigh in on the pipeline project.
King has pledged to read every written comment, but in the case of form letters, he said he only plans to note the signatures at the end.
"I actually got my calculator out, and if I do one minute per letter, it will take me 14 and a half days," he said with a chuckle.
Clark County Commissioner Chris Giunchigliani said she sent a letter opposing the pipeline because she thinks valley residents have a responsibility to "live somewhat within our means."
"Should we be taking water just to feed growth? Is that really the way to do public policy? I don't think it is," she said.
Water authority officials probably weren't banking on Giunchigliani's support anyway. During the year she served on the agency's board of trustees, she made her feelings known by voting against the acquisition of ranch property in White Pine County to support groundwater development.
Giunchigliani said as far as she knows she is the only county commissioner to oppose the project in writing, but that's OK. She has gotten used to being alone on an island when it comes to certain issues.
"So be it," she said. "I know how to swim."
The Nevada Wildlife Commission also sent a letter of opposition to the state engineer -- and without a moment to spare.
The nine-member board of governor-appointees voted to oppose the project within hours of Friday's deadline and then sent a messenger to King's office to make sure the letter got there in time.
Wildlife Commissioner Charlie Howell of Las Vegas said the vote was 7-0 with two members abstaining because of potential conflicts.
"To draw down that much water would be devastating for the wildlife," he said. "That's just way too much water to take out of there."
As far as Howell is concerned, the project doesn't make much sense at the south end of the pipe either.
"We don't need to get water for another 250,000 homes in Clark County," he said. "We don't need another 250,000 homes in Clark County. We've got way too many empty homes already."
The commission's stance may not reflect the views of the Nevada Department of Wildlife as a whole.
Department officials have been in talks with the water authority over a possible monitoring and mitigation agreement for the pipeline project.
The authority has reached similar deals with several federal agencies that manage land or other resources in areas targeted for groundwater development.
Water authority spokesman J.C. Davis said discussions with state wildlife officials have been ongoing for months, but "nothing is imminent" in terms of an agreement.
The cities of Las Vegas, Henderson and North Las Vegas all publicly support the pipeline project, as do the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce, the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, and several gaming, construction and labor organizations.
King said his decision on the authority's groundwater applications will be largely based on state law and scientific evidence, not the court of public opinion.
But the fact that more than 20,000 people chose to make their feelings known is not lost on him.
"It's public comment. It doesn't rise to the level of expert testimony. But it's someone's opinion, and I certainly have to give it some weight," King said.
All written comment on the pipeline project will be available for public view on the state engineer's website.
King said the first letters should start going up later this week. He couldn't say how long it might take to post all 23,000 of them.
Contact reporter Henry Brean at hbrean@reviewjournal .com or 702-383-0350.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
If the state engineer's decision is yes, I hope it is challenged vigorously in court, with additional expert scientific testimony presented.
Just tell the Conservation Group to handle their business in their
states and we will handle ours in Nevada.
The cost of this project for so few acre feet of water is idiotic. If it were a personal business decision, you would not do it. A fortune has already been spent buying ranches. A moratorium would be so much wiser. I am not a tree hugger but this I believe will destroy part of this beautiful state.
@gehrig- Defense contractors are the biggest thieves. All major weapons programs are overbudget & behind schedule. The $65Billion F-22 stealth fighter fleet was grounded due to defects. The$400Billion F-35 JSFprogram--biggest arms contract in history, is 65% overbudget, and already outclassed by existing Russian fighter exports (Su-35, MiG-29SMT).
BTW--I MISS MY YUCCA MTN PROJECT PREVAILING WAGE!
that gubmit designed, constructed, and managed, "large public works projects" have overruns... like, duh. notice the monorail, that boondoggle with input from politicians, to boot. better, let the pipeline project bids worldwide. no "prevailing wage" or hire some percentage of any race/gender/rap sheet drones. and the only input from the comatose politicians, let them slash the permitting process. no stalling to protect bat migration routes, threatened weeds, desert tortoise scat.
I ask again: where are the data on rainfall and infiltration in those areas, which prove that there is enough RECHARGE to support withdrawing that much groundwater? If the groundwater is not replaced with new water, then what you are doing is "mining fossil groundwater." And once it is gone, it's GONE. End of story.
L.A. pipes there water in? Right or wrong I think this most likely will go thru, Vegas is a hell of a town !
if you dont want the pipe then shut down Las Vegas.
the water goes where the population lives.
or you can move to Idaho...ho...ho.
This water district has bought so much of the "water rights" they don't care..now, not that I am in favor of this water tap, I am not, but I will say, after living in this Valley for more than 40 years, loving all parts of our great State, it is the "water district" that needs to be arrested, and put in prison. As we do grow, they will up the dollar usage fees and make you not want water..if you don't feel it already, hang on..cause it will not get any better. They only want you to enjoy their "Spring Preserve", enjoy their big luxury offices and not question the fact that a lot of the people working there make more than the Governor of this State.
Large-scale public projects are usually billions overbudget & years/decades behind schedule.
What will Southern NV be like in 20years?
Will the regional (or US economy) have recovered from the Great Recession?
Will most of the world's gaming tourism go to Macau instead?
A PwC study projected that Asia will surpass the US gaming market by 2013!