Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Opinion
Oct. 12, 2007
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

EDITORIAL: The state's conscience

Retired ethics professor Craig Walton, who taught at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, for 33 years, died Monday of complications from surgery. He was 72.

He initiated the Ethics and Policies Studies program at the school, and -- upon retirement -- continued his work in that field by founding the Nevada Center for Public Ethics.

Given how important ethics in government are to the survival of that great unspoken contract between governors and governed -- especially given how those vital bonds of trust are strained in an era when government seeks to meddle everywhere, creating the impression that the very right to do business is "up for bids" -- it's interesting how few competitors professor Walton had when a Nevada news-hound needed to pick up the phone and ask someone, "Is that ethical?"

The picture was further clouded by a state Ethics Commission that insists on answering a question other than the one most frequently asked.

Most Popular Stories
  • EDITORIAL: Ignoring the court
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: 'You've a gun on your T-shirt'
  • LETTERS: An incredible imbalance in salaries
  • ERIN NEFF: Gibbons and the sweetheart deal
  • LETTERS: Blame the doctor, not the messenger
  • LETTERS: No free lunch with green solutions
  • EDITORIAL: The death of common sense
  • FROM OUR READERS: Is it too late to make a deal?
  • LETTERS: Give up your car and ride a bike
  • EDITORIAL: It's satire, ladies and gentlemen



    • Voters, presented with news of a complex (but all too common) financial arrangement in which a regulated person or entity seems to be currying favor with an office-holder, generally want to know, "Is that ethical?" But commission members -- who are, after all, political appointees and thus political creatures -- prefer to answer, "What happened was within the law."

    Given how vastly different are the burdens of proof, that answer qualifies as "non-responsive."

    It was vastly to Mr. Walton's credit that he rarely couched his answers in such Delphic evasions. While "As a philosopher he tried to take the charitable view" -- in the words of former student and former state lawmaker Jim Spinello -- Mr. Walton called issues as he saw them, straight down the middle, without perceptible personal bias.

    "He has been the conscience of the state," said his friend, state Senate Minority Leader Dina Titus, D-Las Vegas, on Wednesday.

    Not a bad epitaph, at all.



    Leave Your Comment 2 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    cas127 wrote on October 12, 2007 02:35 PM: Must agree with Mark - time after time our "elected" officials sell out taxpayers (whose forces and focus are diffuse - although economic stagnation and decay may concentrate them) in favor of tax funded special interests who kick a fraction of the confiscated lucre back to the prostitute pols.

    Doesn't a majority of Americans believe this at this late point in our decline?

    We would be much much better off electing a limited, stated slate of objectives ("Cut teacher comp by 10%, etc.") than making the eternally idiotic decision that some angelic individual is going to amazingly come along and act in a trustworthy fashion.

    The simple solution - more complete rule by ballot initiative - why do you think the utterly corrupt political class hates initiatives so much and expends so much energy to destroy them "legally" (so much for our judges too...)

    In this dying democracy it is the scum that rises to the top.

    More complete rule by ballot initiative is the ultimate form of self-determination - exactly what our slimy politicians and fatted special interests wish to continue stealing from us.


    Mark wrote on October 12, 2007 07:02 AM: In 72 years he learned nothing. Government cannot be reformed; just ignored, or better, destroyed.