Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Opinion


GEOFF SCHUMACHER: Drought prospects call for a more sustainable community

I've been captivated recently by a new book tracing the story of the Anasazi people.

For decades, the Anasazi have fascinated archaeologists, who scour the harsh desert lands surrounding the Four Corners area, studying the vast ruins of a highly developed culture that flourished for at least 1,000 years.

Those who learned about the Anasazi in elementary school tend to remember something about their mysterious "disappearance" in the 13th century. Popular legend holds that, for reasons unknown, thousands of people abruptly picked up and left their homes, never to be seen again.

Naturally, the real story is more complicated. As Craig Childs explains in "House of Rain: Tracking a Vanished Civilization Across the American Southwest," the Anasazi did pick up and leave the Four Corners region, as well as areas farther north in Colorado and Utah. But the main reason isn't a mystery: It was drought.


Most Popular Stories
  • LETTERS: School administrators immune from cuts
  • LETTERS: Power bills high enough? Not for Harry
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: Inching back up the path toward freedom
  • ERIN NEFF: A depressing spectacle in Carson City
  • LETTERS: All kids should be able to bring books home
  • EDITORIAL: Jobs for life?
  • LETTERS: Blame social promotion, grade inflation
  • EDITORIAL: Schools need reform -- but not my school
  • ERIN NEFF: Snippets from the special session
  • EDITORIAL: Fixing a boondoggle



  • A severe and long-lasting drought gripped the Southwest in the 13th century. Even for the Anasazi, who developed ingenious ways to grow corn and build architectural wonders in the desert, the Great Drought was too much to take.

    The Anasazi migrated south, to places where there was more water, building new communities or joining existing ones. And they never really vanished. They are the ancestors of the Hopi in Arizona, the Zuni in New Mexico, perhaps the Tarahumara in northern Mexico.

    The prolonged drought that drove the Anasazi out of their homes is, I believe, a cautionary tale for Las Vegas.

    Las Vegas is a city built in defiance of its location and its climate. Without feats of modern engineering, Las Vegas could not support anywhere near its current population of 2 million people.

    And yet, Las Vegas remains vulnerable to the whims of the climate.

    When people started settling in Las Vegas in the 19th century, water bubbled out of the ground. Spring-fed pools near modern-day U.S. Highway 95 and Valley View Boulevard prompted Spanish travelers to call this place Las Vegas -- "the meadows." It was a relatively wet time in the Mojave Desert.

    But the groundwater feeding the Las Vegas springs could support only so many people. By the 1950s, it was clear to local officials that a new water source would be needed if Las Vegas wanted to continue growing.

    Enter the Colorado River. U.S. Sen. Alan Bible, D-Nev., worked in the 1960s to secure federal funds for a pipeline to draw water from the river's nearby reservoir, Lake Mead. The Southern Nevada Water Project started delivering water to Las Vegas in the early '70s, allowing Las Vegas to become the unlikely metropolis we inhabit today.

    But the Colorado River is limited, too. Besides the federal law allowing Nevada to draw a maximum of 300,000 acre-feet of water from the Colorado each year, the river's volume depends on the climate.

    The American West is in its eighth year of drought. You don't really notice it in Las Vegas, where it's always hot and dry. But look to the Rocky Mountains, which are the source for the Colorado. When the snowpack in the Rockies dwindles, less water runs into the river. The Colorado is at its lowest level in more than a century.

    Nobody knows how long the drought will last. It could end next year or it could linger for another decade or more, creating big problems for all the Southwestern cities that depend to varying extents on the Colorado. Some scientists speculate that this isn't really a drought at all, but a return to a drier normal after several hundred years of unusually wet weather.

    Some experts worry that the odds of a longer drought are increased by climatic changes elsewhere. Arctic ice is melting at an alarming rate, and a growing chorus of scientists theorizes that this could dramatically reduce rainfall in the American Southwest.

    In other words, the Great Drought that pushed the hardy Anasazi out of the Four Corners could be kid stuff compared with what the Southwest could see over the next several decades.

    Las Vegas is not designed to cope with this sort of climatic change. It is not, in popular parlance, a sustainable community. But unless we want to suffer the same fate as the Anasazi did 800 years ago, maybe we ought to start working on that.

    Instead, of course, our business "leaders" remain focused on short-term financial strategies. In an astounding case of bad timing, members of the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce traveled to Washington earlier this month to lobby for expanding the amount of federal land for sale around Las Vegas.

    This came at a time when an unprecedented 28,000 houses are for sale in the Las Vegas Valley. Forty percent of them are unoccupied. In addition to these existing structures, thousands of acres of private land remain undeveloped within the valley, as well as 20,000 acres of federal land on the edges that still have not been auctioned off.

    There is no pressing need to subject even more public land outside Las Vegas to the bulldozer's blade.

    But more important, Las Vegas may not have enough water to provide for a significantly larger population. Plans to pump water from rural Nevada are in the earliest stages of development and still face the possibility of being derailed by opponents.

    And even if rural water starts flowing to Las Vegas 10 years from now, it may not increase the overall supply but merely compensate for possible drought-induced, stricter limits on water withdrawals from the Colorado.

    Who knows? Predicting the future is a dangerous game. But it's more foolhardy to ignore future possibilities in the quest for immediate gratification.

    The rising real estate crisis and uncertainty about the water supply are cause for caution, not profligacy. It's time to improve the sustainability of our community, not recklessly push ourselves into a new type of crisis.

    Las Vegas is one of the world's most amazing cultural centers -- equaling the Anasazi's marvelous cultural mecca, Chaco Canyon in northwest New Mexico. Let's learn from the Anasazi story by figuring out how to keep Las Vegas going strong through the drought and beyond.

    Geoff Schumacher (gschumacher@ reviewjournal.com) is Stephens Media's director of community publications. He is the author of "Sun, Sin & Suburbia: An Essential History of Modern Las Vegas" and, coming in February, "Howard Hughes: Power, Paranoia & Palace Intrigue." His column appears Sunday.



    Leave Your Comment 5 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Jane Feldman wrote on October 25, 2007 10:51 AM: Geoff -
    Good thinking!
    Why is it that people seem to think that it's OK to make money in the short term with no thought for long term consequences? I don't get it.
    Why is it that people who build NEW houses get all the attention, all the fedeal support - and not the poor joe who's trying to sell a home he owns because his job moved him? I don't get that either.
    For that matter, I think that land and housing should have a priority to be used to give people a place to live - not to give companies a way to become wealthy. We have plenty of places for people to live, obviously.
    And the next word I'll hear the Chamber yell out will be "jobs!" Of course people need jobs. People employed on new construction could actually be used to maintain and repair the homes and buildings that we already are living in and using. As a home owner, I have tremendous problems finding good repair people to work on my home - they are all consumed working on the Big Jobs on the Strip or on the sprawling edge of town.
    I'm more than ready for business to change here in Las Vegas - change where all of us can reap the benefits of the good life, not just the big builders.


    GEORGE wrote on October 22, 2007 04:05 AM: Water control is futile unless it is coupled with population control. Most of the environmrntal problems are the result of unsustainable population growth. Most environmentalists will not even address the issue because solutions involve the taboo subject of immigration.


    Bill wrote on October 21, 2007 12:43 PM: I think you're preaching to the choir, Geoff. No one in their right mind thinks that Las Vegas needs to be growing at the breakneck rate it is and has been growing for years.

    I'm sure you're aware that land developers and politicians who butter each others' bread are not in their right minds.


    Mark wrote on October 21, 2007 09:32 AM: I'm glad I rent. I would hate to be stuck with a house here. Last night the valley was a real dustbowl with that sandstorm.
    The future for Vegas is bleak, with the drought, new casinos in Macau and probably New York City, the crime and corruption problem, etc.


    Whiskey Tango Foxtrot wrote on October 21, 2007 03:35 AM: The current water situation blows but it won't improve even if every resident of the Las Vegas valley reduced their water usage 90%. Until the water distribution rights are changed, we in Las Vegas won't have one little bit of effect on the level of Lake Mead. Until the other states drawing water from Lake Mead implement water reduction plans, nothing WE do will stop the water drop in the reservoir. Get 90% of the californicators to remove THEIR lawns and we'll see a difference in water usage. But reducing growth in this valley will only keep us from draconian water regulations...unless the water usage rights are changed.