Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

Opinion


J.C. WATTS: Does GOP care about the black vote?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've noted in presidential campaigns present and past that most viable candidates are always looking to "enlarge their territory" by appearing before groups that may not be obvious constituencies.

To wit: Seven short years after referring to Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and other evangelical leaders as "agents of intolerance," John McCain was the commencement speaker at Falwell's Liberty University this past spring.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • LETTERS: You paid PMI on your mortgage? Sucker!
  • LETTERS: If we're going to reward irresponsibility ...
  • EDITORIAL: Simpson case is far from finished
  • LETTERS: We keep re-electing utter failures
  • LETTERS: Another proud moment for Congress
  • FROM OUR READERS: Country's house of credit cards has finally collapsed
  • EDITORIAL: The second debate
  • ERIN NEFF: The Big 60 looms large for Democrats
  • LETTERS: Spend on classrooms, not consultants
  • EDITORIAL: Tough times



  • This is referred to in political circles as expanding your base. Or mending fences.

    To wit again: Rudy Giuliani, America's mayor, who has not been known as a friend of the Second Amendment, recently addressed the national convention of the National Rifle Association. This speech came complete with an "unexpected" phone call from Mrs. America's Mayor, whereupon Mr. Mayor asked if she wanted to "say hello" to the conventioneers. How endearing.

    This too, is a base-expanding, fence-mending operation.

    This leads me to observe the obvious oversight (diplomatically speaking) of many of the Republican candidates for president this year.

    I've heard an adage over the years that applies in this case: "If you are to be an alternative, you have to be where the alternative is needed."

    For longer than I've been involved in the political process, the Republican establishment has claimed to want to provide an alternative for the black community, yet party elite refuse to show up for the game.

    The more I ponder some of the boneheaded decisions GOP candidates have made of late, I can't bring myself to believe that they are serious about capturing more than about 8 percent of the black vote.

    I have often said one of the reasons more blacks don't support Republicans is because they don't trust the GOP establishment. I can, without fear of contradiction, assure you the Conventional Wisdom Caucus and the Status Quo Caucus and the same-old-tired-establishment consultants are running the GOP front-runners' campaigns -- and aiming to get no more than 1/12th of the black vote.

    As evidence, I point to Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo, who was the only Republican presidential candidate to speak at the Urban League convention in July, and the fact that none of the Big Four GOP candidates showed up at Morgan State University (a historically black college) for a candidate forum hosted by National Public Radio commentator Tavis Smiley. Hmmm.

    I'm perplexed by these actions because candidates say one thing about inclusion and outreach but they do another. How can you do outreach and not reach out? Not showing up for these events was a grievous and inexplicable error. I certainly don't consider inclusion to be baking a cake, then having me watch as everyone else eats it, as today's consultants would seemingly have us believe.

    Inclusion is asking me to help in making the cake, and sharing in its tasty delight. This is the message the presidential candidates send when they show up at these forums.

    Once in the general election, and safely out of the cloistered world of Republican primary politics, our nominee will want to trot out black faces -- usually black Republicans -- to try to win the black vote. This is insulting when you consider he likely didn't show up at events that were established to reach out to the black community. Trust me, these candidates will pay a price in the general election.

    Republican candidates avoiding the Urban League and the Morgan State debate is as nonsensical as saying "I want a bath, but I don't want to get wet."

    The excuse du jour -- "I had a scheduling conflict" -- is the campaign equivalent of "my dog ate my homework." All of us, in campaigns and life, make time for things that are important to us. It's a matter of priorities. One can only conclude that growing the base of our party isn't a priority to the GOP establishment. Not only that, but when national candidates make a decision to avoid these events, they put every loyal Republican activist at the state, county and even precinct level on the defensive.

    The bottom line is, you can spin it, but you can't defend it.

    One of my Republican friends asked me if I thought the candidates skipped these events because of the black audiences they would face. I can't presume to read their hearts and minds, but I do have to admit that it did cross my mind.

    J.C. Watts (JCWatts01@jcwatts.com) is chairman of J.C. Watts Companies, a business consulting group. He is former chairman of the Republican Conference of the U.S. House, where he served as an Oklahoma representative from 1995 to 2002. He writes twice monthly for the Review-Journal.



    Leave Your Comment 85 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Matthew wrote on August 25, 2008 04:46 AM: Mr. Watts,

    I watch as you rose to power in Congress and I was concerned that you would be used as tool for the GOP but not as a instrument of change. I commend your efforts and your positive desire to work with both major parties. I believe in your Heart of Hearts that you believe systems can change for the betterment of all.

    Today, your eyes are wide open and your pursuit of certain truths can only be ascertained to the degree that party needs will be met. Both groups pander votes from women, Blacks, Hispanic and popular ICONS. I wonder if Michael Phelps is a Republican..if so McCain will surely have him at the GOP convention with Gold Medals around his neck and McCain holding his hand up in Victory. Same scenario if he was a Democrat. Political rhetoric is short lived but well timed.


    Bret wrote on July 21, 2008 07:05 PM: Ed:

    I agree with your points, especially about a venue hosted by Smiley; thats a set up for every liberal media outlet to pounce on with 5 second soundbites of booing.

    I admire your solution as well, let Watts moderate...Id prefer he get the vp slot. Maybe he will run in the future with Jeb's son....thats a ticket worth getting behind.

    I wonder if JC's newest venture into "black" news will be a benefit to delivering a conservative message to the black community....biased forums aside, you have to admit that republicans have done a poor job of getting their message across to the black community.


    Bret wrote on July 21, 2008 06:57 PM: I wish JC would just jump in this thing..3rd party or vp, as long as he gets in the WH


    Ed in Florida wrote on June 17, 2008 06:09 AM: As a black conservative I must respectfully caution you on your criticism of the GOP's relationship with blacks because YOU are part of the problem

    Why? You (and I though you have more culpability) have allowed the political atmosphere to become so radioactive for any republican/conservative to even touch the subject of race that is now naive for you and harmful to the GOP to simply criticize their black community outreach efforts.

    This is a very big subject worthy of much discussion but allow me to zero in the Tavis Smiley moderated debate at Morgan State. Please be open to this: Why would a republican presidential candidate subject himself to hostile taunts disguised as questions, be forced to address the hopeless volitile subjects of reparations slavery, affirmative actions, etc. And then find himself the subject of every liberal media's outlet represented by a misleading soundbites designed to show him as a racist complete with the booing/jeering background noise from the antagonistic audience at Morgan State.

    Realistically what would have been the benefit to the GOP candidate, Mr. Watts?

    Solution: JC Watts have the voice and authority to make the change.

    You pick the venue and moderate the debate. The GOP would gladly show.
    You propose and organize the outreach programs: The GOP would gladly support it.
    You handpick the key supporters that you can delegate responsibility to carry out your proposed outreach programs and more importantly take the inititative to create more and make the out reach even greater:
    The GOP would take the initiative...with the cover of being sponsored by JC Watts.

    In short, Mr. Watts, the GOP have no voice, no authority, no respect in the black community and media.

    Thank you, Ed in Florida


    W.W. BLANKS wrote on May 13, 2008 05:30 AM: WELL- DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT ALL. RUN. NOW. THROW YOUR HAT IN FOR VP. NOW. AMERICA NEEDS YOU. NOW. WHAT ELSE NEEDS TO BE SAID. NOTHING. WWB


    Scarlete wrote on March 16, 2008 10:26 AM: Bravo for those wanting Mr. J.C. Watts to become more involved in the present election campaign.

    Due to his integrity and business knowledge I want Watts as VP. If you are in agreement, please write to Senator McCain respectfully requesting Watts as VP.

    If possible, let us not allow party elitist to select their man or woman. We, the "common sense" of the Republican Party, must make our choice known today! Let us see if we are party inclusive or not; even a letter of refusal (or Bull) is acknowledgement that we are "here"(in the past, other suggestions I've made have meant Nothing to "them" by the lack of response, but I am still willing to try again).

    cherokeej@lightningspeed.net


    Scarlete wrote on March 16, 2008 09:13 AM: Addressing Mr. J.C. Watts:

    I am sorry that you are no longer in the US Congress. I wish you had remained there and I wish you would be chosen as McCain's VP, as does my son who is a retired Marine Officer.

    Skin color has no bearing on wanting you as VP, your business knowledge is needed!

    It's obvious that I am a Republican, but I feel disenchanted, too. The only time I'm actually remembered is when the RNC wants money.

    However, I shall support Senator McCain due to not being desirous of another ongoing free-spending, Socialist Democrat as the United States President.

    By the way, I'm a native of Tahlequah, Oklahoma, but presently residing in FL as a retiree (limited income female, not a "rich" male Republican as many think and say the majority of Rep's are; I am also "red" and white, so again I don't fit the "lily white" stereotype the Dem's claim the majority of Rep's are.

    It's a shame the elite Rep's can't see the forest for the trees! They cut off their own foot -- ignorant bunch.

    If a new political party were presented as truly conservative, meaning No Wild Pork Spending, I would leave the Republican Party post haste and actively join the new party.




    Paul J. wrote on March 05, 2008 02:41 PM: I agree with everything you said J.C.
    I've been wanting you to run for president or V.P. since I heard you at the Republican National Convention. Now is the time! Your message needs to be heard now more than ever.


    Bradley S. King MD wrote on March 05, 2008 09:00 AM: JC Watts should be drafted as the running mate for John McCain. He is young, inspiring and conservative right down the line. He is one of many Republican people of color that I admire and he is admirable appart from his color. By the way I am a middle aged white christian male if that matters at all. I'm also an Army Reserve Medical Officer and I've served in Iraq twice so far.
    Please share this with Rev Watts if possible. Rev/Rep Watts Please consider serving your country once again.


    Derek T Shepherd wrote on March 05, 2008 05:26 AM: I am in 100 percent agreement with you Mr. Watts. I have recently taken the step of changing my party affiliation (formally a Democrat) I realize the fallacy in Black people automatically considering themselves as members of the Democrat party. We have been taken for granted as a voting block for the democrats for years. I am dedicated to and hoping for that to change. They are a party of pacifiers, appeasers and entitlement deceivers.

    I have seen for years this attitude Republicans seem to have toward people of color and subsequently bought into the rhetoric offered by the Democrats. But I have grown to realize neither party respects us as possessing sound and cogent mind with decision making ability that should be coveted and courted as other blocks of voting demographs.

    Mr. Watts I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your shinning example of what a politician should be, not just a Black politician. You have set the bar, and I am anxious to either except the challenge of attaining those heights set by you or train others to do so.

    I lived in Oklahoma, your home state, during your tenure as Congressman and the level of respect and admiration those people have and had for you is beyond compare. Though you, considering your character, you probably did not do the things you did for any level of accolade that could be heaped upon you.


    Derek T. Shepherd
    Citizen


    Read All Comments