Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

Opinion


EDITORIAL: On the road again

U.S. Highway 95 project almost a wrap

Many gridlock-fatigued Southern Nevada drivers have waited more than 10 years for these words: the widening of U.S. Highway 95 through central Las Vegas will be finished this week.

The most badly needed, time-consuming, politically challenging project in the history of the Nevada Department of Transportation is finally at an end. The days of lane shifts, ramp closures and endless rows of orange barrels will soon be gone. Only a few more days of finishing work -- signage, paint, etc. -- stand in the way of quicker, less-frustrating commutes.

An overwhelmed, six-lane freeway is now a gleaming stretch of 10-lane highway between the Rainbow Curve and the Interstate 15 interchange. Completed at a cost of about $520 million, it will provide a well-timed jolt to the valley's economy and a welcome improvement to the area's overall quality of life. The added lane capacity and more efficient entrance and exit merges will speed up traffic flow and relieve some pressure on the area's congested surface streets.

Will the revamped highway correct all of the artery's choke points? Unfortunately not. The widening project is not without warts.


Most Popular Stories
  • LETTERS: School administrators immune from cuts
  • LETTERS: Power bills high enough? Not for Harry
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: Inching back up the path toward freedom
  • ERIN NEFF: A depressing spectacle in Carson City
  • LETTERS: All kids should be able to bring books home
  • EDITORIAL: Jobs for life?
  • LETTERS: Blame social promotion, grade inflation
  • EDITORIAL: Schools need reform -- but not my school
  • ERIN NEFF: Snippets from the special session
  • EDITORIAL: Fixing a boondoggle



  • For starters, one new lane in each direction will be open only to motorcyclists and vehicles with at least two passengers. Unlike HOV lanes in other metropolitan areas, which prohibit single-occupant cars and trucks only during peak morning and evening hours, this restriction will be in place 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Violators will face a $300 fine, said trooper Kevin Honea, spokesman for the Nevada Highway Patrol.

    NDOT needs to make the state's first HOV lanes open to all vehicles for the majority of each day.

    Additionally, the realigned Rainbow Curve will still force two lanes from eastbound Summerlin Parkway to merge into one before entering southbound U.S. 95. NDOT had enough right of way to create two dedicated lanes for this interchange, but inexplicably chose not to.

    The squeeze on Summerlin drivers won't be as bad as the one they endured throughout construction, which reduced eastbound traffic to one lane at Buffalo Drive. But when travel on Summerlin Parkway grows in the years ahead -- its Beltway interchange will be upgraded and the parkway will be widened from four to eight lanes in the near future -- NDOT will have no choice but to fix this awful mistake.

    And resort corridor workers will run into the same slowdowns when merging from southbound U.S. 95 onto southbound I-15. The additional I-15 lanes needed to speed that turn won't be built until at least 2011, said NDOT spokesman Bob McKenzie.

    However, northbound I-15 traffic that travels the massive flyover ramp to northbound U.S. 95 should move much more quickly because of the widening improvements.

    Overall, the good news that will result from this endeavor significantly outweighs the bad. NDOT is planning a big party to mark the project's completion, to be held near the southbound U.S. 95 offramp at Valley View Boulevard. But that celebration won't take place until Dec. 17. Too many people deserve recognition before then.

    For starters, taxpayers can thank the Sierra Club for adding about $30 million in costs and more than a year in delays through a bogus federal lawsuit. It's doubtful the greens would dare hold another news conference in the shadow of the highway's new sound walls, as they did in 2005, and declare that smooth-flowing traffic will pose a greater cancer risk to the people who live nearby than snarled, bumper-to-bumper traffic. Today, the Sierra Club is far too busy trying to make electricity unavailable and unaffordable to Southern Nevadans by obstructing construction of new coal-fired power plants.

    Among those who deserve genuine appreciation: former Gov. Kenny Guinn, who made the U.S. 95 project one of the state's highest priorities; Sen. John Ensign, who actually put some heat on the Sierra Club to drop or settle its lawsuit; Clark County Commissioner Rory Reid, who helped finalize the settlement with the Sierra Club that allowed the widening to go forward; and all the NDOT administrators, planners and contractors who moved at warp speed to get the job done once the courts were removed from the equation.

    The U.S. 95 project isn't perfect, but it buys a lot time -- for motorists and the valley at large. The West's biggest boom town finally has its first stretch of 10-lane highway.

    It's a moment of progress worth commemorating.



    Leave Your Comment 6 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    John F wrote on November 11, 2007 11:53 AM: Grumpy,

    thanks for the clarification!


    grumpy wrote on November 11, 2007 09:15 AM: I'd like to clarify my earlier comment for John F and others: I am a former resident of LV not a current one I am now living in Ohio as a result of my job transfer. John F, Iappreciate your concern and share them. I too was frustrated with motorists who violate the law on registration.


    David J. Syzdek wrote on November 11, 2007 08:07 AM: Maybe if NDOT would have done a thorough job on the required environmental studies, they wouldn't have been sued to complete the studies.


    John F wrote on November 11, 2007 07:39 AM: Grumpy,

    Driving your car around here while registered in Ohio is against the law. When I'm driving this new stretch of highway, I'll think of people like you who are enjoying its benefits while having done all they caould to avoid oaying for it. Thanks a bunch.

    Seems to me like you're getting the benefit of representation without taxation.


    Mark wrote on November 11, 2007 06:53 AM: The government's incompetent use of our money is without end. A half billion dollars should have bought more.


    grumpy wrote on November 11, 2007 05:24 AM: Having endured the nightmare of highway 95 construction during my residency in LV, I can appreciate the significance of this projects' completion.
    I am disappointed to see that one lane in each direction will be a 24-hr HOV lane. I could almost understand such a restriction during peak usage, but 24hrs seems unfair, given the fact that I (and I am certain) and many other single-occupant motorists paid taxes for this. It seems like taxation without representation. A better way to fund restricted-use highways (or parts of such as HOV lanes) as such would be to establish a voluntary toll system. They work. If you don't wish to pay the toll, you don't have to use that road.

    My license tags would have cost $703 to renew this year--a cost happily avoided by registering my vehicle at a cost of $34 in Ohio. Of that, a large portion was (rightly so) dedicated to highway construction and maintenance. That said, to deny use of a lane (emergency conditions excepted, of course) seems blatantly unfair.