Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

Opinion


VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: Good intentions, abominable results

Dear Vin," writes one earnest parent, "I dropped my 'terrified' 6-year-old off today at Blank-Blank Elementary, a government-funded school. Wait. Was she terrified? No. She hugged her first grade teacher, Mrs. Y. When we went to the book fair at the school gym two weeks ago, she hugged her four or five times and told her she loved her.

"Mrs. Y? What a do-nothing government bureaucrat. She is there two mornings a week before 8 a.m. to help tutor Annabelle with her reading. And when I picked Annabelle up Wednesday at almost 6 p.m. from the Kid's Club county government funded ($4 a day) after-school program, Mrs. Y still was in the classroom helping a child. ...

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • LETTERS: Tight-fisted casinos need to loosen up
  • LETTERS: Professor needs to get with the program
  • LETTERS: Trickle-down economics is dead
  • EDITORIAL: Tip jar
  • FROM OUR READERS: We can't do worse than country's current leadership
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: Shall we save the economy ... or the government?
  • EDITORIAL: A tiny bit of good news?
  • EDITORIAL: Cut spending during lean times
  • LETTERS: Don't expect district to cut waste
  • EDITORIAL: Sending the right message



  • "I think we are getting a deal paying her approximate $45,000 a year government salary. Why would I want to end this government school? Is a private school going to do anything more for Annabelle?"

    I replied: I regret to learn you've decided to commit your child to the indoctrination of a collectivist government monopoly, funded with moneys looted from me and others against our will.

    Of course they employ many cheerful and well-intentioned people who enjoy working with children. Of course they start out teaching common and useful things. That's why they've been getting away with this for so long.

    I also suspect you vastly underestimate Mrs. Y's compensation. If the poor dear won't have to live on and pay her health care costs out of her savings when she retires, can you really compare her $45,000 to that of the 250-day-a-year private-sector taxpayer who funds her salary and all her benefits, and then must save for his own retirement out of what's left?

    Meantime, now that you and Mrs. Y are teaching Annabelle what wonderful things can be accomplished with funds looted from others against their will -- and that the government can best determine what she should learn -- do you really think those lessons will have no long-term impact?

    Have you ever heard the story of the guy who started dumping free corn in the field for the wild pigs, after driving just a single fencepost into the ground? Every day he went out and drove another fencepost into the ground, laying a few cross-beams between the posts. Every day the pigs waited for him to walk off a piece, and then came around for the free food.

    They ridiculed the lone holdout pig, who stayed lurking at the edge of the woods as they glutted themselves.

    Finally the day came when the pen was finished. The pigs walked in, just as they had become accustomed to doing. And the man closed the gate.

    I'm glad you appreciate all the free stuff you're getting at the expense of those who would find their furniture set out on the sidewalk if they declined to "volunteer" their school taxes. I sincerely hope you don't wake up some day to wonder why Annabelle is helping them load you in the truck.

    At the very least, you might want to visit one of our local high schools, watch the kids with the spiked hair and the body piercings go through the metal detectors and hunker down to sneer, "I'm never gonna read another book as long as I live once I get outta this dump," and ask yourself how on earth these institutions manage to produce such an end product from such promising raw material as all our bright, lovely, enthusiastic Annabelles.

    It's not as though we weren't warned. I recently came upon an old copy of Rose Wilder Lane's "The Discovery of Freedom/ Man's Struggle Against Authority," a seminal work of modern libertarian philosophy.

    Way back in 1943, Ms. Lane was explaining: "Forty years ago, American children went to school because they wanted to go, or because their parents sent them. Children knew the fact that schooling is a great opportunity which the Revolution had opened here to all children alike."

    But "The American method of education was never fully developed; it was stopped about 40 years ago, by the eager German-minded reformers, who believed that the State can spend an American's money for his, or his children's education, much more wisely than he can.

    "American schooling is now compulsory, enforced by the police and controlled by the State (that is, by the politicians in office) and paid for by compulsory taxes. The inevitable result is to postpone a child's growing-up. ... His actual situation does not require him to develop self-reliance, self-discipline and responsibility; that is, he has no actual experience of freedom in his youth."

    Trying -- and failing -- to disguise the underlying compulsory nature of their undertaking, "The teachers try to make learning easy, a game," Ms. Wilder pointed out. "But real learning is not easy; it requires self-discipline and hard work. The attempt to make learning effortless actually keeps a child from discovering the pleasure of self-discipline and of the mental effort that overcomes difficulties."

    Rose Wilder Lane warned us, 65 years ago. John Taylor Gatto -- New York City and New York state (government) teacher of the year -- quit in disgust in 1991 and has devoted the remainder of his career to documenting the sociopathologies caused by compulsion schooling.

    No one will believe it could be the fault of a system that would hire the charming Mrs. Y. They watch our kids doped up on Luvox and Ritalin to keep them docile in their seats, our fine expensive schools reduced to madhouses where teachers are denied the power to discipline or expel the depraved, where the inmates occasionally march in with stolen guns to mow down everyone in sight -- and they merely insist "Annabelle hugged her first grade teacher and told her she loved her."

    I liked my first-grade teacher, too. But India and China now produce many times more qualified engineers than we do; the "high school graduates" down at McDonald's don't know how to count change, and they can't find Iraq on a map.

    But they sure have a pantload of self-esteem.

    Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial page editor of the Review-Journal and author of the novel "The Black Arrow." See www.vinsuprynowicz.com.



    Leave Your Comment 33 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Dr. Bill wrote on March 03, 2008 09:55 PM: It's fun sometimes to have a chuckle reading the scribbling of such simplistic neanderthals... perhaps he should have attended school in his ancestral Poland where the kids score so high...and education is provided by the state (with 'stolen' money!)...


    Jeremiah wrote on January 16, 2008 10:32 AM: I would disagree because if we can only give grades that are 55% or greater, we are pretending that any grade that ranges from 0-50% didn't happen.

    What about 30%? 45%? Those don't artificially deflate grades. My biggest concern with this policy is that it promotes grade inflation, which does a disservice to kids, parents and teachers. A zero is a fairly extreme example to offer, but even if that is the grade earned, that becomes a part of your body of work. It has to be included in order to present a complete picture of what someone's capable of, including their work ethic.


    Mike wrote on January 15, 2008 06:28 PM: "It is the policy of the CCSD that she not give a grade lower than 55% regardless of how poorly a child does on an exam or for the semester."

    A zero artificially deflates an average. The policy is a good one. BTW, Vin, you need professional help.


    patriot wrote on January 13, 2008 10:16 AM: Only 45,000 wow what a steal. Hey you ever think maybe you should just do some tuturing with your own child, and let us keep our money so maybe we can put ours in college ?


    Mr. Wiiley wrote on January 08, 2008 12:20 PM: I like the storie bout the wild pigs two. Its relly funy.


    Sgt Kranz wrote on January 08, 2008 12:09 PM: Here is a link describing the farmer and the wild pigs.


    Bill Smith wrote on January 08, 2008 04:11 AM: Well said RandomReader. You were "educated" in a government school, right?


    Michael wrote on January 07, 2008 10:59 AM: Great article. Administration of the public school system is an excellent example of what happens when we forget the "government" is really just a bunch of people who lack the initiative, accountability, and spirit of private enterprise, but whom we give the authority to control us and our hard-earned assets anyway. How stupid of us. Ron Paul looks better everyday! :-)


    Bill Smith wrote on January 07, 2008 05:35 AM: As usual Vin, the fascists and the socialists always dance around the issue of taxation. They think it is perfectly OK to elect others to steal from their neighbors. I find it disgusting that so many sheep support theft. But then again this is what you get from so many years of forced taxation and forced government education. The only purpose that government has is to grow itself and to live very well from the blood of the productive. That is why none of this BS surprises me anymore. Government is the parasite of society. It always starts small and grows until it finally kills its host and we're witnesses to the death of American society.


    Mamamia wrote on January 06, 2008 09:22 PM: Sorry but I liked school 50 years ago, and I like them today because we have no choice but to take what we can and if we resist, we go to jail, and if you think our schools are bad,you ought to see our jails! well, I think you get the point. But beggars cannot be choosy, no matter what you say. Only the poor have no choices in life. If we had more money, we'd only spend it on foolish things, like fruits and vegetables and utilities,ect. You get it!


    Read All Comments