Web Site Analytics
Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

Opinion


VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: Locking a nation into permanent childhood

A letter-writer recently objected that I used great libertarian Rose Wilder Lane as a "sole source" for the fact that American schooling was taken over, in the late 19th century, by statists enamored of the Prussian compulsion model, aiming to create a docile peasant class by crippling the American intellect -- making reading seem real hard, for starters, by replacing the old system in which delighted kids learned to combine the sounds of the Roman letters, with a perverted "whole word" method better suited to decoding hieroglyphics.

In July 1991, John Taylor Gatto, New York's Teacher of the Year, quit, saying he was tired of working for an institution that crippled the ability of children to learn. He explained why in an essay published that month in The Wall Street Journal.


Most Popular Stories
  • LETTERS: Casinos learn gamblers want the human touch
  • GLENN COOK: Hypocrites! Hypocrites! Hypocrites!
  • EDITORIAL: Reverse discrimination
  • LETTERS: Reid's hometown rejects wind power? Oh my!
  • LETTERS: Berkley, Titus support witches' brew of taxation
  • EDITORIAL: Turn out the lights ...
  • EDITORIAL: Confronting witnesses
  • FROM OUR READERS: In the dark about the new light bulbs
  • Springs Preserve a positive for Las Vegas
  • EDITORIAL: Pricing probe




  • Let's look at that essay, and see if we can find our "second source":

    "Government schooling is the most radical adventure in history," Mr. Gatto begins. "It kills the family by monopolizing the best times of childhood and by teaching disrespect for home and parents.

    "Socrates foresaw if teaching became a formal profession, something like this would happen. Professional interest is served by making what is easy to do seem hard; by subordinating the laity to the priesthood. School is too vital a jobs-project, contract giver and protector of the social order to allow itself to be 're-formed.' It has political allies to guard its marches, that's why reforms come and go without changing much. ...

    "David learns to read at age four; Rachel, at age nine: In normal development, when both are 13, you can't tell which one learned first -- the five-year spread means nothing at all. But in school I label Rachel 'learning disabled' and slow David down a bit, too. For a paycheck, I adjust David to depend on me to tell him when to go and stop. He won't outgrow that dependency. I identify Rachel as discount merchandise, 'special education' fodder. She'll be locked in her place forever.

    "In 30 years of teaching kids rich and poor I almost never met a learning disabled child; hardly ever met a gifted and talented one either. Like all school categories, these are sacred myths. ..."

    These are not the words of some sour-grapes loser who "couldn't make it" as a teacher. Testimonials from Gatto's former students fill a whole book.

    Citing the 1993 National Adult Literacy Survey, Gatto in his book "Underground History of American Education," reports only 3.5 percent of Americans are literate enough today "to do traditional college study, a level 30 percent of all U.S. high school students reached in 1940, and which 30 percent of secondary students in other developed countries can reach today."

    This month, that majority is choosing our presidential candidates based on who looks better on TV.

    "During the post-Civil War period, childhood was extended about four years," Gatto's research shows. "Later, a special label was created to describe very old children. It was called adolescence, a phenomenon hitherto unknown to the human race." This "infantalization" continues, as "Child labor laws were extended to cover more and more kinds of work, the age of school leaving set higher and higher. ..."

    Gatto recounts how a woman once showed him a poem written by a high school senior in Alton, Ill., two weeks before he committed suicide:

    " 'He drew... the things inside that needed saying.

    Beautiful pictures he kept under his pillow.

    When he started school he brought them...

    To have along like a friend.

    It was funny about school, he sat at a square brown desk

    Like all the other square brown desks ... and his room

    Was a square brown room like all the other rooms, tight

    And close and stiff.

    He hated to hold the pencil and chalk, his arms stiff

    His feet flat on the floor, stiff, the teacher watching

    And watching. She told him to wear a tie like

    All the other boys, he said he didn't like them.

    She said it didn't matter what he liked. After that the class drew.

    He drew all yellow. It was the way he felt about Morning.

    The Teacher came and smiled, "What's this?

    Why don't you draw something like Ken's drawing?"

    After that his mother bought him a tie, and he always

    Drew airplanes and rocketships like everyone else.

    He was square inside and brown and his hands were stiff.

    The things inside that needed saying didn't need it

    Anymore, they had stopped pushing... crushed, stiff

    Like everything else.' "

    Perhaps you'll say we're better off without losers who can't get with the program, anyway.

    "After I spoke in Nashville, a mother named Debbie pressed a handwritten note on me which I read on the airplane to Binghamton, New York," Gatto continues:

    'We started to see Brandon flounder in the first grade, hives, depression, he cried every night after he asked his father, "Is tomorrow school, too?" In second grade the physical stress became apparent. The teacher pronounced his problem Attention Deficit Syndrome. My happy, bouncy child was now looked at as a medical problem, by us as well as the school.

    'A doctor, a psychiatrist, and a school authority all determined he did have this affliction. Medication was stressed along with behavior modification. If it was suspected that Brandon had not been medicated he was sent home. My square peg needed a bit of whittling to fit their round hole. ...

    'I cried as I watched my parenting choices stripped away. My ignorance of options allowed Brandon to be medicated through second grade. The tears and hives continued another full year until I couldn't stand it. I began to homeschool Brandon. It was his salvation. No more pills, tears, or hives. He is thriving. He never cries now and does his work eagerly.' "

    You can read John Taylor Gatto's entire "Underground History of American Education," detailing just how Mann and Dewey and their gang imposed on us a Prussian system of coercive schooling, so ill-suited to a free people, at www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/.

    What I wonder is: If you "care about the children," why don't you want to?

    Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial page editor of the Review-Journal and author of the novel "The Black Arrow." See www.VinSuprynowicz.com.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 84 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Robert wrote on March 06, 2008 05:33 PM: Thanks for the link to John Taylor Gatto's book. I recently finished reading the whole book, and what an eye-opener! I instinctively knew some of what he wrote from my own experiences, but never suspected that our forced schooling system was actually DESIGNED to dumb its students down to serve a couple of special interests (a compliant, unquestioning work force, and creation of and maintenance of a caste system that belongs lost and forgotten in the Dark Ages). Several times when I read about the less-than-honorable purposes, and the proof of those intentions, I was outraged! I also recognize a lot of truth in what John Taylor Gatto wrote from my own experiences in the public school system. Perhaps my natural inclination not to just do what everyone else did, and my attitude that I didn't care if I wasn't like everybody else helped me get through it without too much damage. Still, approaching age 40, I'm finding there was a lot of stuff I was taught that just isn't so. And now having read of the nefarious purposes of the forced schooling system, AND ITS PROOF, there is no way I'll ever let any child of mine fall into the clutches of those dehumanizing institutions. It'll be home schooling for sure! The book has to be among the best 50 hours or so I spent. Now THAT was educational!


    Arleta wrote on February 28, 2008 11:40 AM: Hey guys - the story is school and children and the way in which that is affecting America, not who's the most macho.

    I have been fighting the school system for 40 years - I am in complete agreement with the author.

    We are weakening our future, teaching our children to believe in entitlements, painting them within the boxes we have created and labeled in order to ensure that they are incapable of rational and free thought and will follow the party line whereever it goes.

    We are destroying creativity whilst claiming to embrace it, crushing individuality whilst calling for "diversity" - the current republicrats do not want creativity or individuality, and true diversity can never exist - we must speak the same, in pseudo-terms of congeniality at all times, dress the same, have the same weight, the same values, the same cares, and be sure to line up straight and don't talk back and for God's sake (or no, you cannot say "God" or "Allah" or even "Pity" because it may be taken for religious statement) don't THINK.


    Bill Smith wrote on February 18, 2008 06:34 AM: The days of our republic died with the election of our first communist president, Abe Lincoln, if not before.


    Amy wrote on February 16, 2008 09:27 PM: Ryk writes: "I did not agree to millions in nonsense abstinence
    education but I have to fund it. That is how democracy works majority rules."

    Actually this is NOT how it works. What you are describing is Mob Rule. And, we don't live in a democracy. We live in a Republic.


    naegi wrote on February 12, 2008 08:35 PM: Ask any ex-wife if being right is "always" enough. You gotta ask what your goal is and how it's going for ya.


    Bill Smith wrote on February 12, 2008 09:01 AM: Being right is never enough? Right is always enough. The system is broken, always has been broken, and always will be broken. That is how it was designed.


    naegi wrote on February 12, 2008 08:08 AM: Okay, I'll elaborate with a question. Do you or do you not own a shotgun? I'm glad that you do. I'm glad for people with values like yours. What disturbs me about the difference between you and someone like Ryk is that you seem to have all the right criticisms and none of the motivation, energy or aim that he has. Even so, if all you do is preserve what few rights and freedoms we still have; and all he does is make what changes he can for the better in an imperfect system, I don't see why you two can't respect each other for what you each bring, without you feeling the need to call names and get emotional. If you kept your head, you just might could convince someone as energetic as he to carry your (valid) viewpoints out into the system - our system. Simply being right is never enough. You do have to worry about being effective.


    Bill Smith wrote on February 10, 2008 06:56 AM: Hey Douglas the demopublican, does your family pay property tax on "their" land? If so then they do not own it, they pay rent to the government. See what happens when they stop paying their rent.

    Amerika is a fascist state and you support it. Of course only someone uneducated would think that only Germany was a fascist state.

    http://rebirthofreason.com/Articles/Madden/You_Might_be_a_Fascist.shtml

    I bet almost, if not all, these fit you Douglas the demopublican.


    Douglas Democrat wrote on February 09, 2008 05:46 PM: "Unfortunately it is impossible to own land in Amerika."

    Most of my family would disagree with you, since they all own their own homes and the property they sit on. Bought it way back in the 1970s when land in Nevada was dirt cheap, then homesteaded the place.

    But the only dishonest person I see here is YOU? "Amerika"? For real? Surprised you didn't throw a "Seig Heil!" in with it, since you think this is a fascist state and all...


    Bill Smith wrote on February 08, 2008 12:02 PM: Please elaborate on this "better shot".


    Read All Comments