Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

Opinion


EDITORIAL: The Bush budget

The president sent his budget to Capitol Hill on Monday, and it landed with a predictable thud.

Congressional Democrats aren't happy with the fact that the Bush plan actually exercises a modicum of fiscal restraint.


Most Popular Stories
  • EDITORIAL: If only we could tax more
  • LETTERS: With economists like these, who needs enemies?
  • J.C. WATTS: Sonia Sotomayor and bootstraps
  • LETTERS: Brace yourself for coming tax hikes
  • LETTERS: Nuclear power could be the answer for Nevada
  • EDITORIAL: Firemen's pensions past due for reform
  • EDITORIAL: Education 'consultants'
  • EDITORIAL: Hoe, hoe, hoe
  • EDITORIAL: Ensign woes
  • EDITORIAL: Internet sales taxes




  • "It's dead on arrival," said Max Baucus, the Montana Democrat who chairs the Senate Finance Committee.

    That's precisely what Democrats said during the 1980s when Ronald Reagan attempted to trim the size of the federal government. Then, after they spent like drunken sailors, Democrats had the gall to blame Mr. Reagan for the budget deficits that ensued despite record revenue streams.

    At any rate, Sen. Baucus has a point. The president will be out of office by January, so a Democratic Congress has little incentive to cater to Mr. Bush's priorities.

    "He doesn't have us over a barrel this year, because either a President Clinton or a President Obama will have to deal with us next year," Majority Leader Harry Reid said this week.

    Then again, Sen. Reid, what if it's President Romney or President McCain? Perish the thought!

    Despite the political reality, the bottom line remains that congressional Democrats -- and some Republicans -- won't tolerate a budget that doesn't further pad the ample backside of the federal behemoth.

    Consider that the president calls for spending $3.1 trillion in fiscal 2009. That means federal spending will have jumped more than 50 percent from the $2 trillion Washington blew through just seven years earlier. But that's apparently not enough for many members of Congress, who are upset that Mr. Bush seeks to reduce the growth of Medicaid and Medicare while freezing budgets for many domestic agencies and programs.

    In the meantime, entitlement spending will continue to soar as Congress refuses to consider any structural reforms for these looming budget busters.

    The president deserves his share of criticism for using budget gimmickry to deflect the likely costs of our military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan. And his assumption that the alternative minimum tax will be imposed on millions of new taxpayers is pure folly.

    But Mr. Bush deserves credit for presenting a budget that eliminates 151 programs at a savings of $18 billion and attempts to finally get a handle on discretionary domestic spending.

    Which is why the party of Big Government has deemed the plan "dead on arrival."

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 26 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    David Johann wrote on February 06, 2008 10:18 PM: Okay, let's not weenie around. Herb speaks of Mitt Romney, a devout Mormon, and in the same breath speaks of the morality of monogamy. Uh, huh.

    The patriarchs of Mitt Romney's faith, Joseph Smith and Brigham Young had HOW MANY WIVES, HERB? How many? Too bad for all those deserving Mormon males without wives, wouldn't you say?

    But let's take the matter in hand. I'm assuming those situations worked about as well for Joseph Smith's and Brigham Young's multiple wives and their offspring as the stories we have recently read about the Mormon cult in Hilldale, Utah and Colorado City, Arizona.

    Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints.

    Fundamentalist. As in getting down to the fundamental teaching.

    While we shame Bill Clinton.


    David Johann wrote on February 06, 2008 09:37 PM: Did Hillary "accept it?" They remained married, something a counseling man or woman of the cloth probably would have advised. It's hard to know what goes on with married couples behind closed doors: even the first married couple. When careers are involved, and a child, careers in the limelight . . . .

    Martin Luther King Jr. reportedly had indiscretions. Should we denigrate the work he did that had nothing to do with that? Should we denigrate Corretta Scott? Did MLK contribute to the moral decline of this country, or, in the main, to it's elevation?

    Kenneth Starr's seemingly unlimited investigation was supposed to be about Whitewater and the Rose Law firm, but somehow ended up with Monica Lewinsky. How?

    How, Herb?

    Jesus was big on forgiveness as are most true mystics / religious sages. More, the Bible says "judge not lest ye be judged."

    It was ten years ago, Herb. Once again, get over it.

    BTW, do we REALLY know what a GOOD FAMILY MAN Mr. Romney is? Do we for sure? He probably is, but his Mormon faith certainly is no guarantee. The busiest brothels in Nevada are on the Utah border.


    Herb wrote on February 06, 2008 06:21 PM: I will never get over it David. Clinton's womanizing has contributed to the moral decay in this country. He has made this type of behavior socially acceptable. I respect good family men like Mitt Romney, I have the deepest animosity towards rotten cheating men like Bill Clinton and the backwards wives who accept it like Hillary Clinton.


    Herb wrote on February 06, 2008 06:11 PM: Senate Republicans just blocked Dems attempt to lard up the stimulus package. This just goes to show that Reps are superior to Dems when it comes to cutting spending.


    David Johann wrote on February 06, 2008 06:04 PM: Regarding Bill Clinton Herb, sez " . . . I loathe him for his womanizing . . ."

    Generally, people who are sex shaming are sex obsessed and, at the same time, sex repressed.

    Herb's counsel might sound like the "Church Lady" who warned us: "don't let your naughty parts get all tingly."

    If Herb is a church-goin' man, I wonder what his religions says about forgiveness (??).

    Monica Lewinsky was ten years ago, a mistake among two consenting adults. Get over it.


    John F wrote on February 06, 2008 04:55 PM: Herb,

    By your logic we would have had to invade Iraq as a way to support Israel's interests. But the invasion of Iraq was clearly contrary to Israel's interests. It has made the world a much more dangerous place for them. I have to admit, though, you may have a point. Invading Iraq was also clearly contrary to our interests, but we did it anyway. Who's to say the geniuses who came up with this idea also didn't think they'd be helping Israel?

    Of course if we're going to help anyone in the Middle East, it might as well be the Israelis. Not only are they a democracy, but as the Arabs would say, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.


    Douglas Democrat wrote on February 06, 2008 04:14 PM: Herb,

    "Blame the American people for insisting on compassion, if there were more purists like myself we wouldn't have a deficit."

    Yeah, and I'd be DEAD because you'd gut the Medicare program that pays for my anti-rejection medicine (since private insurance will not cover me at all).

    "We also should have expanded Gitmo and used more wanton torture."

    Does the phrase WAR CRIMES mean anything to you? Torture is ILLEGAL under United States law and it is ILLEGAL under international law (including the Geneva conventions). Not to mention IT DOESN'T WORK! Never has, because the person will being tortured will say whatever he thinks his captor wants to hear to make it stop. NOT ONE AMERICAN LIFE has been saved by torturing a prisoner.

    Do you have a soul at all? Or are you another hard-hearted bastard who only cares that you got yours?


    Herb wrote on February 06, 2008 04:00 PM: John, Yes I believe we ran us the deficit in large part to make Israel safer. Things just didn't work out as planned, but that was the intention.

    I wouldn't have invaded Iraq to begin with. If we really wanted to fight terrorism we would have left secular Iraq alone and gone after the radical Muslim countries. We also should have expanded Gitmo and used more wanton torture.


    Herb wrote on February 06, 2008 03:48 PM: Douglas Democrat, why should I take blame for being a big spender? I could see it coming when he called himself a "compassionate conservative" during the 2000 election. My ideal candidate would say he has no compassion, wants to cut spending and taxes, and keep government as small as possible. The problem is this kind of candidate couldn't get elected. Blame the American people for insisting on compassion, if there were more purists like myself we wouldn't have a deficit.


    Douglas Democrat wrote on February 06, 2008 03:00 PM: "He is the most liberal senator of them all."

    Russ Feingold of Wisconsin and Bernie Sanders of Vermont want to have a few words with you. Obama isn't even in the top ten in terms of liberalism in the Senate, let alone #1.

    And to try and say Bush's failings is because he's a "liberal disguised as a Republican" is pathetic. He's YOUR party's failure, YOU live with it.

    And I'm sick of red-baiting. It's almost as bad as "Vote Republican or the EVIL Terrorists will kill you in your sleep" mantra. Please - find some new writers, your material went out with the 8-Track.


    Read All Comments