Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

Opinion


EDITORIAL: Meat recall

Food recalls have become synonymous with sickness in recent years, so public worry over the removal of 143 million pounds of beef from store shelves this week is understandable.

In 2006, bagged spinach was pulled from supermarkets after leaves tainted with E. coli bacteria left scores of people ill in more than half the states. Last year, a salmonella outbreak that sickened hundreds led to a huge peanut butter and peanut product recall. And just last week, grocery chain Trader Joe's announced it would stop selling single-ingredient items imported from China over concerns about the adequacy of that country's food inspection system, which failed to catch contaminated pet food and fish, among other products.


Most Popular Stories
  • EDITORIAL: Stood her ground
  • LETTERS: A moral obligation to not bankrupt the country
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: 'Allowed' to carry for self-defense
  • EDITORIAL: 'Are you serious?'
  • LETTERS: Nursery did the right thing with laborers
  • EDITORIAL: Pound foolish
  • EDITORIAL: Gotta have faith
  • EDITORIAL: Clunk, clunk
  • LETTERS: Put aside re-election interests for nation's good
  • LETTERS: Heroism an important part of war coverage




  • The beef recall, the largest food take-back in the country's history, was ordered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in response to the release of undercover video shot by the Humane Society at a Southern California slaughterhouse run by Westland/Hallmark Meat Co. The video footage showed cattle too sick to walk being dragged and shocked by company employees, shoved with forklifts and soaked with high-pressure hoses. The footage is unsettling.

    Meat from downed cows is not supposed to be processed and sold under USDA standards. Such animals, if not treated or euthanized, wallow in their own waste, which can increase the risk of contamination from E. coli, salmonella or mad cow disease.

    But there's a big difference between managing an increased risk of disease and actual, widespread sickness. And thus far, no illnesses have been attributed to beef products that originated from the California slaughterhouse.

    Consumers would appreciate knowing that this recall is taking place to revoke the USDA's seal of inspection from the meat, not because of the risk of illness.

    "Everybody's going, 'Oh, a recall, that means death, that means sickness.' That's a different kind of issue," said USDA spokesman Keith Williams. "This is a lower severity, where there would be a remote probability of sickness."

    Wesland/Hallmark's treatment of its animals is deplorable and in clear violation of federal standards. But the horror associated with this campaign needs to be dialed back a notch. The next time the USDA decides to undertake its biggest recall ever, it needs to do a better job communicating the real risk to public health.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    FedUp wrote on February 20, 2008 12:43 PM: A recall--big f-ing deal. How about closing the plant down for as long as it takes to investigate all aspects of it that warrant it's license to do business, with all costs charged to the business? After 2 or 3 of these circuses, the industry might go out of their way to ensure all standards are met to such a degree that there would be NO confusion. At least for a while.

    There's always civil disobedience, too.


    Report abuse

    what? wrote on February 20, 2008 11:43 AM: sure nobody is sick yet.mad cow disease takes years to show up..yeah nobody sick today wow ..


    Report abuse

    f galati wrote on February 20, 2008 10:33 AM: I had no difficulty understanding what was communicated on this issue. To me, it's about basic humane treatment of animals. That should not lessen the importance and scrutiny of this issue and story.


    Report abuse

    Lawrence Hyde wrote on February 20, 2008 08:03 AM: This recall has nothing to do with bad meat, it a way for the government to appease the people who run the spca.  In other words it is feel good politics as usual.