Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Opinion

Thursday
Mar 18, 2010
Mostly Clear
Mostly Clear 55° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

Opinion


FROM OUR READERS: Where will Nevada get more water?

It's time to look beyond the state to basins with overflowing supplies

Henry Brean's Feb. 13 article, "Study gives 50-50 odds Lake Mead will dry up by 2021," and the Review-Journal editorial on the subject the following day were intriguing. As a youth, I grew up in the ephemeral ranching lands of eastern Nevada, where a little bit of water was our life-blood.

Because of a dry climatic cycle, Lake Mead is half full. This presents significant challenges for Southern Nevada -- we are at a crossroad. All options capable of helping us meet our water needs should be on the table.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Judging a judge
  2. Open ... and shut
  3. A lottery would raise money for education
  4. Only the private sector can create wealth
  5. Net neutrality
  6. Open court



In the late 1980s, I was invited to the peaking ceremony at Hoover Dam when Lake Mead was running over due to a short wet cycle, thus providing the high water line we see around Lake Mead today.

The Colorado River Dam System was built to harness the wild Colorado River for reclamation, power generation and recreation. It was almost an afterthought by some forward-thinking Southern Nevada Water Authority officials, who pushed the concept of utilizing Nevada's share of the Colorado River waters to meet our growth needs. Without the vision of these water pioneers, Las Vegas would not be what it is today.

In 1978, I was working for former U.S. Sen. Paul Laxalt of Nevada. Sen. Laxalt, Manuel Lopez, chief of the Bureau of Reclamation in Boulder City at the time, and I met to review the assigned allocations of water for the entire Colorado River system: Nevada, Utah, Arizona and California. Sen. Laxalt was concerned about the future water needs of Southern Nevada and how to meet them. His concerns were:

-- What impact will climatic cycles have on the Colorado River's ability to provide the water needs of Southern Nevada?

-- Will Southern Nevada continue its historic grow rate?

-- What conservation measures should be implemented to stretch Nevada's water resources?

-- What impacts will the Central Utah and Central Arizona Projects have on Nevada's ability to draw its full allocation from the Colorado River?

-- Can we provide Mexico with the amount of treaty-promised acre-feet?

Following the meeting with Mr. Lopez, Sen. Laxalt directed that a white paper be prepared to address Nevada's water needs for Senate consideration. The next three months were spent at the UNLV library, the Las Vegas Valley Water District, the office of Mr. Lopez and with State Senate Majority Leader James I. Gibson. I also used references I had collected while preparing a college paper for a Conservation of National Resources class at Brigham Young University back in the late 1960s.

The result was a 50-page white paper entitled: "Western Water: Past, Present and Future." The white paper concluded:

-- The Colorado River is the most allocated river system in America.

-- The West and Southwest were growing at more than twice the rate of other regions.

-- There is a finite amount of water available in the Southwest, with an overabundance of surplus fresh water in the Northwest. Approximately 90 percent of such water flows go unused.

-- Through a series of conservation initiatives, the existing water allocation for Nevada could accommodate reasonable population growth in Southern Nevada for the immediate future only.

A major construction and engineering company proposed a series of water basin diversions to reallocate surplus water from as far away as the Great Lakes and the Columbia and Snake rivers to the more arid regions of the 17 Western states, from Canada to Mexico. By using existing river systems like the Colorado River, transporting the surplus water would be easy and inexpensive.

Once Sen. Laxalt was satisfied that the conclusions of the white paper were sound, he met with Sen. Scoop Jackson of Washington, who chaired the Senate Interior Committee, to discuss a legislative initiative to meet the West's future water needs. Sen. Jackson initially stressed support for the surplus water reallocation initiative, telling Sen. Laxalt that he needed time to study the concept.

A couple of weeks later, Sen. Laxalt called me somewhat disheartened, indicating that in a procedural move by Sen. Jackson, he had inserted language into a bill that prohibited the study of reallocating surplus waters via trans basin diversions in the United States for 25 years.

The 25-year moratorium is now up. It's a different day. Nevada's Harry Reid is the powerful Senate majority leader, and with Sen. John Ensign by his side, it would be a great legacy for Nevada to provide a long-term solution to the West's water needs.

Let's encourage Sens. Reid and Ensign to implement a major water initiative that would bring surplus unallocated fresh and desalinated ocean waters to the more arid regions of the West. Now is the time to think outside the box.

With a little bit of help from a major water initiative, the Columbia River can run down the Colorado River, and desalinated ocean water can flow uphill.

We can do more to conserve water in our homes, businesses and public places. The water authority indicates that about 70 percent of our water is for external uses, not domestic or hotel uses. Let's use our initiative and become more desert-friendly. And let's encourage Nevada's senators to leave a legacy for future generations.

Ashley Hall is a former Las Vegas city manager.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 5 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

Marinus Baadsgaard wrote on February 27, 2008 09:45 PM: The only solution that makes any sense to the water problem is for Nevada to subsidize building desalination plants in California and use California's allotment out of the Colorado River. New technologies have developed for desalination to keep costs down. These include off shore plants that pipe the treated water to the shore and tie into the water system on land. The environmental impact is minimal because the brackish water has infinite dilution. Building pipelines to Northern Nevada is a waste of money. It takes hundreds of years to replenish the water in those basins. If it didn't work in Owens Valley in California why should it work in Nevada? Why not take the $3 billion to build desalination plants which is a sure thing.


Report abuse

Diane Albert-Hall wrote on February 27, 2008 04:51 PM: Ashley,
Great idea!
Please send your article to Pat Mulroy so SNWA will stop trying to take our So Utah water away from our mtns.Heresay(reliable) is that she is paying Kane Cty.Water conservacy district in Kanab, over 500K+ an ac.ft for water rights on the Virgin river, and Sevier river that actually flows north, not south, to the Colorado.
Don't the people who answered this letter realize that the Snake and Columbia rivers are in upstate California and Idaho and Oregon which always has an overabundance of water?
PS-I also wrote a paper for Paul Laxault on Medicare Fraud at the University level hospitals in 1982-83, and look where we are today with healthcare. It certainly wasn't Sen. Laxault's fault that DC didn't want to hear about healthcare fraud, never mind about natural resource overuse.
So much for trying to stem Global warming and healthcare $ misuse.
DIANE ALBERT-HALL,RN CQMA.


Report abuse

John F wrote on February 24, 2008 02:34 PM: Ashley Hall is living in a dream world.

We're supposed to pipe in water from the Great Lakes?

"By using existing river systems like the Colorado River, transporting the surplus water would be easy and inexpensive."

We're supposed to pipe water from Chicago to Denver, or about 1000 miles. From there we pipe Lake Michigan water up into the mountains and dump it into some tributary of the Colorado. How could anyone think that this would be "easy and inexpensive"?


Report abuse

TimeRanger wrote on February 24, 2008 02:00 PM: It's too late to get water from the Great Lakes - those states and Canada have already enacted legislation to prohibit the export of that water outside of the Great Lakes basin


Report abuse

Frank wrote on February 24, 2008 07:13 AM: Back when he was city manager, Mr. Hall was a huge proponent of the "bullet train" to Los Angeles, another big-money idea that failed. This is pure arrogance indicative of the self-indulgent culture in which we live, and he is pushing a bad idea. We need to use less of the water we already have, and stop giving carte-blanche to developers who seem to get all the water they want every single time. Meanwhile, you and I endure threatening messages from the Water District every day while our lawns die. As usual, money wins out and that's all this is about.