LETTERS: LV whistle-blowers treated like rats - Opinion

SAVE THIS

EMAIL THIS Print

PRINT THIS Popular

POST A COMMENT

Mar. 10, 2008
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

LETTERS: LV whistle-blowers treated like rats

To the editor:

To all the politicians and former politicians and senior executives in gaming and their employees at the state Legislature: Now you know where go-along-to-get-along, shut-up-and-don't-blow-the-whistle leads.

Most Popular Stories

LETTERS: With economists like these, who needs enemies?

LETTERS: Brace yourself for coming tax hikes

LETTERS: Nuclear power could be the answer for Nevada

EDITORIAL: Firemen's pensions past due for reform

EDITORIAL: Education 'consultants'

EDITORIAL: Internet sales taxes

LETTERS: So now you're in favor of regulation, eh?

FROM OUR READERS: In the dark about the new light bulbs

J.C. WATTS: Sonia Sotomayor and bootstraps

EDITORIAL: Hoe, hoe, hoe

Everybody is wondering why there was no whistle-blower among the nurses and other employees who worked at the clinic that put more than 40,000 people at risk for serious diseases. Let me ask you this: Can you point to a single whistle-blower who has been hailed as a hero and rewarded in this town? Where, exactly, is the guy who blew the whistle on hotels that had to close remodeled floors because of construction problems? I think he is now unemployable. Senior executives, meanwhile, keep collecting their six-figure salaries.

So now Las Vegas is being seen for what it is. A corrupt fantasy land with low standards, high school graduates who cannot read their diplomas, unsafe hotels that burn like Roman candles, and a place where you better not get sick and need a routine test because you might end up dead.

Good work, guys. Just a few more instances -- and there will be more, given the corruption in this town -- and you can watch those casino profits drop like a gambling addict's bank account.

News flash: Hard times are ahead for this economy, and the last place people want to visit for a vacation is one where "top-level" hotels are unsafe and going to a medical facility is as much of a crap shoot as visiting a casino.

Doug Nusbaum

LAS VEGAS

Deserved a choice

To the editor:

I am one of the patients of the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada who had a colonoscopy after Jan. 11. I am very upset that the clinic was not closed prior to my visit.

Obviously, authorities were aware of the clinic's unsafe procedures before my visit, and yet it was allowed to remain open. I feel very violated not only by the clinic, but by those who knew they should have closed the doors to prevent the further spread of blood-borne diseases. I am furious that I was not at least given the opportunity to know before my colonoscopy what had been going on there. I would not have had the procedure done, nor do I believe anyone else would have had they been given the choice.

Does anyone have proof that the clinic's unsafe protocols were changed after Jan. 11? I, as well as many others seen in the past month, have gone through a living hell, having blood testing done to assure our family doctors that we were clean of these diseases before our experience with the clinic. We, too, are scared and feel like victims. Our lives and our families are turned upside down now, as well.

So where do I place my blame? On the clinic? On the state? On the Southern Nevada Health District? On the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention?

If a restaurant had bugs, it would be closed. Yet this clinic remained open for more than a month. Where was the consideration for patients?

Cathy Warriner

LAS VEGAS

Party houses

To the editor:

The city of Las Vegas is making a mistake in adopting an ordinance that will allow short-term house rentals (Thursday Review-Journal).

I live beside a "party house" in Henderson. Renters of this type don't come to Las Vegas to meditate. I've had to call police numerous times due to loud parties lasting into the early morning. Neighborhood children get to see hookers dropped off by taxis. The owner is not around to address things such as broken sprinkler pipes causing a flood in my yard.

Henderson's ordinance supposedly prohibits this nuisance, but the owner gives weekend renters fake 31-day rental agreements to get around it. Residents should not suffer so investors can profit while creating neighborhood blight.

Thomas Stelljes

HENDERSON

Not big on Big Oil

To the editor:

In response to your Feb. 29 editorial "Attacking 'Big Oil'":

Comparing the rising cost of an ice cream sundae to the rising cost of gasoline is just too funny. Maybe you should take another look at an Economics 101 textbook, or better still, start writing comic books instead of editorials.

The truth is that if the cost of an ice cream sundae continues to rise, I can make a decision to stop buying ice cream sundaes and tell my friends to stop buying ice cream sundaes. If this were to happen, demand would be reduced and the cost would come down.

I wish the same were true about gasoline, but I need gasoline. Maybe I should walk 20 miles to work, but that would not work over time. So, like most people who own an automobile, I have to purchase gasoline regardless of what price they choose to charge.

The same is true for all businesses that depend on gasoline to deliver their products. We currently have little choice, and because of this, the real cost is much higher to all of us than the price at the pump.

We should all attack "Big Oil" for being so greedy. The tax exemption, or "subsidy," or whatever you choose to call it should no longer be available to any company that is making record profits.

Ken Hamm

LAS VEGAS

Share & Save

Leave Your Comment	47 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor. Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Please enter your name Name: Please enter your email Email: Please enter a comment COMMENTS : (word count limit is 300) You have reached the maximum number of words allowed Current Word Count: Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background. ralph wrote on March 10, 2008 10:39 PM: Heavens no we don't want the big oil companies to make any money. They don't need it for exploration, or to build refineries or anything else. Any money big oil makes they waste. It's MUCH better if we have big oil send all their profits to the government so the money gets used responsibly and isn't wasted!! ya right. Additionally, where do all these people think their retirement funds are invested? Ben and Jerry's stock? At the bank in a 3 percent passbook savings account? J. Carni wrote on March 10, 2008 10:27 PM: This is addressed to the editors of the R.J. concerning the response by Ken Hamm (3-10-08) to your editorial Feb. 29. Are the Oil Companies greedy?, or is it just capitalisism at it's finest? Foreign Gas wrote on March 10, 2008 08:12 PM: Thank you for noticing, Travis... it's too bad you are not consistent in your argument... this is a quote from your very posting which inspired my post: There's no simple solution, but the rise in the cost for a barrel of oil is the primary reason gas prices are so high. What is the difference between primary reason gas prices are so high (cost of barrel) and Biggest reason foreign gas is so high is Taxes. Which is it, Travis? Is Gas expensive because of Tax or is it cost of natural resource? Or is it both? Follow the money, Travis... if the government is making 2 to 3 times the cost of the natural resource in tax revenue, is it really fair to blame the companies returning 10% of spend to shareholder value? If the USA adopted a $5 per Gallon gas price and the oil companies still made only 10%, would it be fair to be angry with BIG OIL? If we asked BIG OIL to return half of their profits back to the consumer, that would reduce the cost of gas by about 20 to 30 cents... let's get the government to return the other $2 per gallon. Thoughts? Travis wrote on March 10, 2008 07:51 PM: Sorry, BIGGEST reason. Travis wrote on March 10, 2008 07:48 PM: Foreign Gas. The most reason why they pay so much more for gas is due to the high taxes they pay. Foreign Gas wrote on March 10, 2008 07:28 PM: I wonder how many of you who are claiming that the oil companies are gouging us at the pumps at $3 to $3.50 per gallon of gas have ever lived overseas where petrol (gas) is approximate $6 - $8 per gallon? Same gas/petrol, same usage 2 to 3 times the price... are the oil companies getting richer off the Rest of the World at twice the rate? Have we become so socialist in our thinking that we can no longer be successful and make a profit even if it is only at 10%? No wonder the American economy is suffering... companies are just going to move overseas to more free market economies that are taxing the successful... douglas wrote on March 10, 2008 05:50 PM: travis... i'm well aware of the plight/thin margins enjoyed by gasoline retailers. my suggestion was to the anti-business whiners who think everyone who handles, or is involved in the exploration through retailing is getting fat at their expense. several, well located independents from "back home" have discontinued gas sales. they now only service cars and light trucks. ustabe that they made more money from the inside sales [twinkies, soda, beer, cigarettes, donuts, sandwiches] than from ten or even twenty gallons of gas. yet with each rise in pump prices, these retailers are bitched at, called all sorts of names, even threatened by small minds like those whiners in this thread. Kit wrote on March 10, 2008 02:48 PM: IN MY OPINION, A CITY WHO THRIVES ON THEIR TOURISTS - NEWSPAPERS AND T.V. SHOULD NOT BE REPORTING ON A "CONTINUOUS" BASIS - NEGATIVE NEWS - SUCH AS THE "MONTE CARLO FIRE" WHICH DIDN'T KILL OR INJURE ANYONE - TO KEEP IT GOING DAY AFTER DAY - AND TO BRING UP THE MGM FIRE FROM PAST YEARS - IF YOU WERE A TOURIST STAYING ON A HIGH FLOOR - PERHAPS YOU WOULD RE-CONSIDER THOUGHTS OF VISITING LAS VEGAS AGAIN. HOW ABOUT "POSITIVE" NEWS FOR THE CITY WE LIVE IN AND EARN OUR LIVING FROM. I HAVE FRIENDS AND RELATIVES OUT-OF-TOWN WHO READ YOUR NEWS DAILY, WHO HAVE CONCERNS NOW ABOUT THEIR SAFETY. ARE REPORTERS JUST GETTING TOO LAZY TO FIND NEW STORIES - INSTEAD RE-HASHING THE SAME STORIES OVER AND OVER AGAIN! tom wrote on March 10, 2008 01:54 PM: i never said they would i said the more we get the better,even an easing of the price would be better... Travis wrote on March 10, 2008 01:51 PM: Our own supplies will not sustain us though. Read All Comments