Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

Opinion


EDITORIAL: Obama's speech on race

Sen. Barack Obama's Tuesday speech on race might very well become the signature address of his presidential campaign.

The Illinois Democrat, running on a platform of change, hope, and unity, is the only candidate capable of addressing race without risking his own sacrifice at the altar of political correctness. But the Philadelphia speech wasn't given entirely on Sen. Obama's terms. Its primary purpose was to address the firestorm of criticism surrounding the race-focused, anti-American sermons of his pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and the senator's refusal to disassociate himself and his campaign from the man who married him and baptized his daughters.

In the process, Sen. Obama sought to return the attention of the media and voters to his broad, inspirational message, his public speaking skills, and his populism.

Sen. Obama again condemned the Rev. Wright's sermons of white oppression, black victimhood and America as evil aggressor, while defending the man's calls to help the sick and needy. The senator revisited his multiracial background and recounted blacks' history of racial injustice, from slavery to segregation. He correctly pointed out that whites harbor plenty of racial resentment, too, and urged Americans to not "retreat into our respective corners," but come together to solve shared challenges and "move beyond some of our old racial wounds."


Most Popular Stories
  • EDITORIAL: It's now illegal to carry cash?
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Hillary's best hope: racism
  • J.C. WATTS: Social conservatives still a political force
  • JOHN BRUMMETT: It's the worst of all worlds for the DemocratsCommentary
  • EDITORIAL: Billing Mrs. Fossett
  • EDITORIAL: Just 'trust our incumbent senators'
  • J.C. WATTS: Your side, my side and the truth
  • LETTERS: Tipping 'expert' a total cheapskate
  • ERIN NEFF: They just figured it was a lingerie supplier
  • LETTERS: To boost revenue, repeal smoking law



  • That Sen. Obama apparently still values the counsel of the Rev. Wright, and whether that reflects poorly on the judgment of a man who aspires to the presidency, became almost an afterthought -- his speech made the issue less about their relationship and more about the future of all Americans.

    So how best to end the country's ongoing race war? Apparently by inflaming the country's ongoing class war, in Sen. Obama's view.

    He would create "ladders of opportunity" -- but not the kind where capitalists launch businesses and offer free-market jobs. Instead, he would lavish more tax funding on failing schools and promise lifetime security for unskilled workers -- all paid for by transferring even more wealth from corporations and the upper- and upper-middle classes to an expanding dependent class.

    "This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn't look like you might take your job," Sen. Obama said Tuesday. "It's that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit."

    Sen. Obama ignores the extent to which that industry is being driven offshore by punitive taxes and regulation. In denouncing racism, Sen. Obama criticizes "profit," the driving force of the most prosperous economy in the world, the very reason that "in no other country on Earth is my story even possible."

    Does Sen. Obama really believe that government-imposed, tax-funded "economic justice" can create the kind of harmony he intends to deliver? That the already bloated welfare state bears no responsibility for this country's racial divide?

    Sen. Obama has proved himself a unifier on the issue of race. But on taxes and the economy, his ideas of equity are as divisive as they come.

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 38 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Joe C wrote on March 19, 2008 08:42 PM: Vegas Vic.
    That’s a mighty low opinion you have of people, many willing to work hard. So we should just let our elite wealthy like Trump or corporations decide what a man’s labor is worth. I never thought someone willing to work was a dependent class.

    How many illegal aliens do you employ? After all corporations and CEO’s are hurting so bad they had to locate offshore.
    I don’t agree with Obama on many things but corporations are not leaving because of a strong middle class, but more opportunity to exploit a greater number of poor. It’s a real shame our corporations are doing so badly they had to move to China and use slave labor cutting costs sending poisons to our kids.
    I’m curious, where do you set the level for jobs you consider the dependent class?
    You’re not for real are you?


    timinator wrote on March 19, 2008 08:30 PM: Hillary, Barack and McCain are all part of the elite. They are socialist parties A and B. The government dole is socialist whether it's given to corporations or the poor.

    The socialist programs over the last 80 years are destroying America. Only a return to founding principles can save the liberty that we so cherished for 150 years.


    John F wrote on March 19, 2008 07:52 PM: Susan,

    Obama didn't vote on the Iraq war because he was an Illinois state senator when the vote was taken He was not in the US Senate at the time. He spoke out publicly against the war at the time.


    Vegas Vic wrote on March 19, 2008 07:51 PM: "...he would lavish more tax funding on failing schools and promise lifetime security for unskilled workers -- all paid for by transferring even more wealth from corporations and the upper- and upper-middle classes to an expanding dependent class."
    In other words, he's going to rob from the rich to give to the poor. How Socialist of him to promise that. He plans to tax his way to the prosperity of the U.S. If he thinks there are already too many businesses sending their jobs offshore now, his plan will cause even MORE to go that way.


    susan wrote on March 19, 2008 07:07 PM: His Preachers hate of white people is blatant and had to be known for years by Barack "Hussein" Obama, To keep going to that church is prof he hates white people also, that chuch is no different than the KKK.

    He keeps saying he was against the Iraq war, but he didnt even vote on it, he missed the vote, if he was so against it he should have been there and voted No, he has a record of missing devise votes.

    McCain or Hillery would be a better choice as our leader.


    snowflake wrote on March 19, 2008 06:47 PM: "It's that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit." Why oh why does Bo keep bringing up this subject of outsourcing jobs? All of us are aware of this practice. What we need to see is his stock portfolio. I bet he has investments in some of those corporations that outsource jobs thus ensuring profits for stockholders.

    One of the problems with Barak Obama that I see, is that his speeches are pure abstract rhetoric.

    BTW, nice gesture to throw your grandmother under the bus to save your arse. Well, I suppose grandmothers are expendable. BO, or should I say Glowbama, is a typical politician who does not deserve the shielding he receives from the media.


    The Truth wrote on March 19, 2008 06:14 PM: Obama is a young radical chicago ward street hustler who sat for 20 yrs listening to the anti american rants of this whacked out socialist preacher! That says it all and its the reason if the Demos nominate him he will go down in flames!


    addie wrote on March 19, 2008 01:09 PM: i thought he was a muslim! lol


    Ken wrote on March 19, 2008 11:15 AM: I must agree with jep.
    Travis, your point IS more of the same.
    If I could bore you for a minute - I grew up in a small town where everyone was basically equal. No one was rich and no one was poor to say. Every child had basically the same education. There were those kids that studied hard and those that sat around smoking dope.
    Ireturned recently for a reunion, and to my amazement found that some of the kids that studied hard were boxing boxes at the grocery store, while some of the kids that smoked dope all day had made small fortunes (and some were still smoking dope).

    I agree all children need a good education. but a good education is no guarantee of success in life.


    Joe C wrote on March 19, 2008 11:15 AM: It’s very hard to believe Obama or congress cares about jobs and corporate greed or profits. They have helped business voting for one bad trade agreement after another besides giving Bush fact track trade approval.
    Obama already gave Canada a wink and nod about NAFTA, has questionable business and campaign financier problems and now refuses to distance himself from racism using the excuse his own white grandmother made similar statements.

    He is no JFK but even JFK wasn’t really the image we believe so many naïve years ago.

    Personally I don’t have one candidate that I want to vote for again, and this lack of leadership and elite government attitude toward working Americans is very disappointing.
    While Obama what’s to move past the racial issue we have so many other issues that politicians talk about solving and that’s it. I’m past the racial issue, I can forget what was said, but not even close to forgetting the complete failure of government in every other issue.


    Read All Comments