Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

Opinion


EDITORIAL: Rewarding dysfunction, Part II

Just four days ago in this space, we pointed out the public sector's propensity for rewarding dysfunction -- when bureaucrats fail to do their jobs or entire institutions are irreparably broken, the solution always involves throwing more money at the problem. It's becoming a broken record.

Certain state officials believe bigger regulatory budgets will help prevent a recurrence of the public health crisis currently gripping the Las Vegas Valley, even though various bodies were slow to respond to patient infections and refused to use the full extent of their authority to mitigate damage and preserve public confidence.

Now the Clark County Commission seems inclined to create an entirely new office, at a starting cost to taxpayers of $4 million per year, to make up for the inept building department's refusal to do its job.

An independent audit was commissioned in response to last year's discovery of shoddy, undocumented hotel remodeling and building officials' willingness to look the other way. The resulting report accused inspectors of negligence and fraud for ignoring defects that compromised hotel guest safety, and recommended the formation of an investigative unit to handle complaints of faulty construction and provide oversight of inspectors.


Most Popular Stories
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Hillary's best hope: racism
  • J.C. WATTS: Your side, my side and the truth
  • J.C. WATTS: Social conservatives still a political force
  • JOHN BRUMMETT: It's the worst of all worlds for the DemocratsCommentary
  • EDITORIAL: Billing Mrs. Fossett
  • EDITORIAL: Just 'trust our incumbent senators'
  • LETTERS: Tipping 'expert' a total cheapskate
  • ERIN NEFF: They just figured it was a lingerie supplier
  • LETTERS: Judge gave drunken driver a wrist slap
  • LETTERS: To boost revenue, repeal smoking law



  • On Tuesday, county commissioners gave preliminary approval to the plan, which would create 20 new, well-paying jobs amid a purported budget crunch. Final approval is expected within a month.

    Ron Lynn, the county's building chief, told commissioners that complaints are a small part of his department's workload. But with extra staff, "They will be pursued in an aggressive and diligent manner."

    That begs the question of why building inspectors couldn't handle the task in the first place. And where was the supervision from salaried managers and administrators, Mr. Lynn included?

    To borrow a construction analogy, the county had a box full of tools to manage the hotel remodeling controversy. It didn't use any of them. Now it's getting a case of new hammers?

    Mr. Lynn vows to use the new team to conduct annual inspections of high-rise hotel and residential buildings. It's a good idea, but the public has no reason to believe he's capable of overseeing such labors.

    The county should be cleaning house, not building a new one.

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 9 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Pamela wrote on March 30, 2008 09:43 PM: I've been reading and listening to accusations and complaints against Ron Lynn for a while. I feel it's necessary to speak out with my personal knowledge. We've known Ron and his family for years, and let me tell you: he truly cares about the public's safety. These stories are so inflammatory and blown out of proportion provoking anger against someone who's doing a good job. Of course, there's red tape in a government office and I'm sure he finds it just as frustrating as many of us do. But, that remark about him lining his own pockets was just the limit! This is the fastest growing city in the world! And some of you think $4 million a year is too much too pay for additonal resources? The inspections department is stretched to the limit. Could you stand to be scrutinized by someone who's got it out for you? And have no way of responding in kind? I know, Ron's not an easy guy to "like"; telling it as he sees it to people who don't want to hear it. I've never worked for the county, but have worked in and around the construction industry in Las Vegas for years and totally get the feelings of frustration. Especially with McCarran! But, really, give Ron a break. He's refused gifts from my family for his family (we've known them for 25 years!) because he has to be SO careful about how it would be perceived by people who have nothing better to do than create trouble for others who don't deserve it - at least not this much venomous crap. If you've got issues with the county - run for office. We'll discuss your effectiveness in the public forum of gossip, sensationalism, and as few facts as possible. Disgruntled ex-employees invited!


    A Public Servant Forever wrote on March 22, 2008 09:24 PM: Lisa Jones was indeed placed in a very tough position, but the one thing that I do admire about her is that she will always tell you the truth. I think that is one of the reasons that the media is also drawn to her, because they know that she is going to be straightforward with them. Lisa stepped up to the Mic, and she told the truth to all of us, she did not try to sugar coat the situation, and she never has. She did not try to place blame, but only give the public the facts; she has always been this way. I don’t want us all to forget who is really to blame here, and that is the physicians, who took a Hippocratic Oath to do no harm, and completely disregarded this oath. These events were eventually going to come to light in our state. As public officials, we are compassionate and caring, but we can’t do our jobs if our hands are tied. Many of the surveyors at the bureau stay there primarily because they care about what they are doing more than about how much they are getting paid. I just cannot bear witnessing someone as caring and dedicated as Lisa Jones being discredited in the eyes of the public in such a wrongful manner.


    ralph wrote on March 20, 2008 04:46 PM: The fact that this is actually going to get approved is almost surreal!! Where on earth can you fail to do your job and get more money!! Well, there is a bright side to all of this. Keep raising taxes to pay for all the employees and their wealthy benefits and pensions, and pretty soon, there will be nothing being built to inspect. Problem solved.


    TimeRanger wrote on March 20, 2008 12:20 PM: And just how much is it going to cost to have someone watch the new watchers??


    Lee wrote on March 20, 2008 07:37 AM: All government is a parasite on the people.


    gerry wrote on March 20, 2008 07:31 AM: Jackson, adding more money to this problem is more than a joke. As always, when the government tries to fix a problem by adding money. it only gets worse.


    jackson wrote on March 20, 2008 07:15 AM: Okay, here is a thought...FIRE everyone in the disfunctional office, and clean out the house. Let county employees know that their jobs are not just fat jobs with no accountability. Government workers become complacent with job security.

    Then, hire new people in these jobs, and set new standards, new policies, and accountability for work. Place their feet to the fire.

    Adding more money to this mess is a joke.


    Tom Mikulski wrote on March 20, 2008 07:14 AM: It seems pretty obvious that if the commissioners are going to approve $4,000,000 for 20 more people to supervise the inspectors who are already being supervised(?) that someone is not doing their job. $4,000,000 divided among 20 people is $200,000 each. Can't we fire the ones not doing their jobs? That's how the problem is solved in the "real world". Maybe they are going to promote the people not doing their jobs into the new positions and then hire people who really want to work as their replacements at a lower wage and save some money?

    As a former county employee, (3.5 yrs), (McCarran, Real Property Management), and a contractor I've seen enough to know that the audit didn't go far enough. I left the county, (cushy job as an electrician), because I had a difficult time with the employee and supervisory ethics standards and work ethic. My greeting at McCarran was "Who do you know?" and "Welcome to the Country Club". Does the public know how much these people are paid. Does the public know that these people are paid a "longevity bonus" because they've been there a long time, not because their production has increased or they have continued their education to be better at their jobs? It might improve if the supervisors were actually trained in basic management principles, responsible for their employees, and held accountable for their actions. It works this way in the "real world".


    bobby luker wrote on March 20, 2008 05:57 AM: Not to worry tax payers, with a plan like this, I'm sure much of that 4 million is meant to line Mr Lynn's pocket. Why not?? If we spend 4 million to pay for someone not doing their job, might as well give that womeone a little bonus for folling the commissioners for so long. Or.. did he fool them???? Every contractor, sub-contractor, anyone who ever pulled a permit has known this for years