Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

Opinion


ERIN NEFF: 'Protection' for whom?

For a state that doesn't like having the federal government poking into its business, Nevada sure does allow plenty of other interests to influence its policies.

Because the Legislature routinely abdicates its responsibilities, Nevadans have grown used to ballot measures. And for well-heeled interests watching the national map from other places, Nevada might look like a suitable place to jump-start a widespread movement.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • EDITORIAL: Public employee pay
  • FROM OUR READERS: Do those who voted for Halverson have a clue?
  • LETTERS: No more cuts to public schools
  • EDITORIAL: Another drug raid gone bad
  • LETTERS: Classic case of burying the news
  • LETTERS: Public school cuts political, impractical
  • EDITORIAL: 'Buyers in these areas are responding ... '
  • EDITORIAL: Rich man, poor man
  • FROM OUR READERS: No tax hikes? It might be time to sue
  • EDITORIAL: School choice



  • For instance, the Marijuana Policy Project has long targeted states where libertarian ideas run mainstream, or where the small voting population can make it easier to pass the kind of policy the group can't get out of Congress.

    After successfully pushing medical marijuana initiatives in Nevada, the group has already been back here twice with attempts at broader legalization.

    The two Howards -- Rich and Jarvis -- have also become regular players here in recent election cycles.

    The late Howard Jarvis remains one of the biggest names associated with efforts to rein in property taxes in Nevada. His California Proposition 13 initiative in the late 1970s is something some Nevada conservatives want to emulate.

    Meanwhile, Howard Rich is a wealthy New York developer who advocates broader tax reforms. He's dumped his money into several Nevada initiatives, including the popular eminent domain measure and the controversial Tax and Spending Control for Nevada, both in 2006.

    This year in Nevada, we could easily see 20 or more ballot initiatives. After voters make selections for president, Congress, the Legislature and lower courts, they'll be confronted with the pages of questions. And when fatigue sets in, things that sound pretty good might just lead an uninformed voter to make the wrong choice.

    These initiatives are rarely as simple as what people think when they sign petitions to qualify them for the ballot. Take the two initiatives being floated by Nevada's latest conservative cause celebre, Nevadans for Clean and Open Government. The proposals are "near and dear to my taxpayer heart," said Kris Munn, chairman of the group and a Texas transplant who made an unsuccessful bid for Nevada's Assembly.

    One initiative would bar taxpayer money from being used for lobbying and the other would ban anyone receiving a sole-source government contract from making political contributions until two years after the contract ends.

    Amid a "culture of corruption," they sound pretty good.

    But if you're not a card-carrying Reagan Republican, these initiatives are scary. The lobbying ban, for example, prohibits unions from automatically taking dues out of workers' paychecks.

    Nationally, Americans for Tax Reform has tried to enact "paycheck protection" in a variety of states. The movement began after the 1996 election, when conservatives believed labor unions were responsible for Republican losses.

    In 1998, an infamous deal here between the state GOP and labor unions kept paycheck protection off the ballot. The unions pulled their own initiative, which would have allowed labor leaders to raise money from their membership any way they pleased. In exchange, the GOP agreed to abandon its initiative.

    The 1998 initiative was pushed here by Sheldon Adelson, who had famously scrapped with the Culinary union. And those who follow politics here closely will recognize some of the activists who pushed the initiative -- Chuck Muth, Dan Burdish and George Harris.

    Fast forward 10 years and some still have hard feelings over the "deal."

    Adelson, whose Las Vegas Sands Corp. will be quite active this election cycle with other initiatives, is a likely backer of the Clean Government group. Grover Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform is another likely sponsor.

    Anti-union initiatives don't just pop up willy-nilly in a state that was granted an early presidential primary in part because of its large percentage of union voters. The initiatives arise when conservatives believe they need a get-out-the-vote carrot, or a bargaining chip.

    Nevada conservatives who are already displeased with presidential nominee-to-be John McCain on a host of issues may need a little something to get them ginned up this November.

    Ironically, by once again trotting out paycheck protection in Nevada, and probably with a lot of outside cash, conservatives may be awakening a formidable opponent. Nevada's labor unions may not be great about delivering elections for an endorsed candidate (see Barack Obama on Jan. 19), but they'll march lock step against paycheck protection.

    Maybe Adelson already has another initiative deal in mind, like the strange bedfellow arrangement of 1998. Just imagine a gaming tax or convention center fight quid pro quo.

    And who knows what else will be out there, or who will bring it?

    Contact Erin Neff at (702) 387-2906, or by e-mail at eneff@reviewjournal.com.



    Leave Your Comment 13 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Tony wrote on April 07, 2008 10:00 PM: All Sheldon Adelson has to do is pay his employees a little less than their worth and in essence his employees are supporting his politics. Sheldon Adelson supports Israel interest first not America's


    Incredulous wrote on March 27, 2008 12:39 AM: Erin said: "The late Howard Jarvis remains one of the biggest names associated with efforts to rein in property taxes in Nevada. His California Proposition 13 initiative in the late 1970s is something some Nevada conservatives want to emulate."

    California's local governments and public utilities, whose taxing powers were effected by Proposition 13, are so presumptuous and dishonest, that they found at least 10 ways around Proposition 13. As a result the voters of California have had to pass at least 3 amendments to Proposition 13, to close the loopholes which the California Courts of Appeal have allowed local governments to rip open the law.

    Then there are at least 8 Court of Appeal opinions slapping down other attempts by local governments to create loopholes to Proposition 13. The local governments refuse to comply with thouse court opinions, and keep doing illegal stuff relating to taxes and fees forbidden by Proposition 13 and its amendments.

    The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation tries to litigate against all of the wrongdoing by the local governments violating Proposition 13, but there are more rip-off public agencies than lawyers at the Taxpayers Foundation to handle the cases.

    I would like to see Proposition 13 passed in Nevada, but it would have to be written to include all of the amendments cutting off loopholes created by the local politicians, and all of the case law decisions explaining what the local governments were doing wrong.

    Proposition 13 is a great law from the real estate taxpayer's point of view. It's the dirty crooked senior level public employees, and the elected officials who rubber stamp their work, that makes Proposition 13 an imperfect solution to reigning in the cost of local government.


    Incredulous wrote on March 27, 2008 12:28 AM: I lived in California between 1978 and 2003. My wife and several of her friends were actively involved in trying to get public interest legislation passed on a number of topics.

    The one thing I learned from directly watching the California Legislature's committee operations was that the Democrat controlled California Legislature was far more corrupt than even the most infamous legislatures, in places like Illinois.

    The corrupt Democrats screw the few honest Democrats. The honest Democrats run to the Republican legislators for help, but together they can't muster the votes to get anything done.

    That's why there are so many initiatives on the ballot in California. Their Legislature is so corrupt the only way to protect the public is through the initiative process.

    I sense that the same thing is true here in Nevada.

    I'm looking for a state where the Legislature isn't morally and intellectually corrupt. Anyone know of one?


    douglas wrote on March 25, 2008 08:36 PM: guess i own/have owned residential and commercial property in a few states besides nevada. in any case, because anything is relatively less expensive, should it be raised ? if that's justified, then surely gasoline taxes should be raised so as to equal the pump price in hawaii or california. that's if the "proof" is accurate.

    at present, i have been told by competent staff at the clark county assessor's office and neighbors, that "our" area's tax district is the highest in the state for residential property. specifically, higher than lake tahoe property.

    in any case, no further tax increase is warranted *until* those departments dependent on that tax revenue rid their services to illegal infiltrators. *after* the parasites are removed from the budgets, the "shortfalls" if any remain, can be revisited. should neighbors reimburse another's gasoline cost when he refuses to plug the holes in his gas tank ?

    and again, if any property owner thinks that his taxes, any tax, are "too low", they are honor bound to send a supplemental check to those departments. to do less is talk instead of walk.


    James wrote on March 25, 2008 02:21 PM: Thanks, Erin. As Dave L. said below a lot of what you've written will pass over the heads of most Las Vegans.

    Sound bites and 30 second commercials can sway a voter whose not really paying attention to an issue. And that's what many petitioners hope for; an electorate that's uninformed and easily manipulated.


    Dave L wrote on March 25, 2008 01:52 PM: Erin, Very nice! As a Vegas old timer, I see what you are suggesting here. Very good. Very astute. Too over the head of many readers.

    As for br and Phil, I suspect you never worked a day in your life, because if you did, you would know that someone, somewhere, some time, put a dime in a political race that came out of your pocket.

    Burdish has had stories written about him (he's a business partner with Muth), about his work as a GOP operative in voter suppression attempts just a few years ago.

    Muth runs a 'charity' (with Burdish), labeled as a "senior center" that unlawfully lobbies government. He receives money from Senator Bob Beers and then signs his praises. What came first, the praise or the money? Oh, he's taken money from Gibbons PAC, too.

    And, Harris..hahahahha, he's with crazy senator Bob Beers on Liberty Watch!


    tim wrote on March 25, 2008 09:20 AM: i can forsee 20 ballot questions this year like erin says,all by the teachers union.


    Phil Hannifin wrote on March 25, 2008 08:46 AM: Erin, Why is it that union leaders will not put forth a system that will allow each member to individually agree in writing to have a specific amount deducted for political uses?
    Is it because many members don't agree with the bosses?


    Rob L wrote on March 25, 2008 08:06 AM: I just love when people call initiatives "Anti-Union" when in reality they are "Anti-Union Boss." The dues union members pay should support the union members, not be squandered on political pandering. This attitude just proves that the lefties could care less about the average Joe and his paycheck. They just see him as a piggy bank to support their legistlative agenda.

    On the flip side, could you imagine the stroke Ms. Neff would have if Sheldon Adelson took cash out each of his employees paycheck to support his politics???


    Evan Ravitz wrote on March 25, 2008 08:01 AM: To improve initiatives, there are good proposals to give voters what legislators get: public hearings, expert testimony, amendments, reports, etc., and to make them less influenced by money and easier for ordinary folks. The best proposal, which includes NATIONAL initiatives (which would end torture, domestic spying, perpetual war and debt, etc. in short order) is from famed former Senator Mike Gravel and YOU can vote to ratify it at http://Vote.org, much as citizens ratified the Constitution at the Conventions! Another is http://cirwa.org


    Read All Comments