Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

Opinion


ERIN NEFF: April fools

For a moment I thought about penning a fictionalized column befitting of today's trickery. Sadly, Nevada news is filled with enough foolhardiness to make the truth seem stranger than any fiction.

Republican presidential candidate John McCain finally found Nevada last week after largely ignoring the Silver State during primary season. Friday's question-and-answer session at The Venetian (with Republicans, it's always The Venetian) ended with far more questions than answers.


Most Popular Stories
  • LETTERS: With economists like these, who needs enemies?
  • LETTERS: Brace yourself for coming tax hikes
  • LETTERS: Nuclear power could be the answer for Nevada
  • EDITORIAL: Firemen's pensions past due for reform
  • EDITORIAL: Education 'consultants'
  • EDITORIAL: Internet sales taxes
  • FROM OUR READERS: In the dark about the new light bulbs
  • LETTERS: So now you're in favor of regulation, eh?
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: Letting the looters vote on who's for lunch
  • EDITORIAL: Water, water everywhere




  • Although it is early in the election year, McCain showed he is running the Bush-Rove playbook for Nevada: Show up, raise money and say nothing, understanding that voters don't really give a hoot about the Yucca Mountain Project.

    Time will tell if the strategy is truly foolish. After all, Bush never crusaded against the gaming industry or ignored our biggest crisis. In 2004, he was just cruising on a good economy and appeasing the evangelicals. McCain probably won't be able to do either.

    There's a bit more tomfoolery than foolishness when it comes to the other Republican biggie who spent part of last weekend in Las Vegas. Robert Duncan, chairman of the Republican National Committee, was out in Nevada's 3rd Congressional District on Saturday stumping for Rep. Jon Porter. He also was the keynote speaker at the Clark County Lincoln Day Dinner.

    As long as long as Republicans continue to see the attention from Washington, they'll know they're in a red state expected to stay red.

    Nevada, however, is turning decidedly Democratic -- in statewide registration, in CD3 registration and with Democrats holding four of six statewide offices.

    Meanwhile, the state's duly-elected GOP governor needs to consult the Motley Fool for a little economic advice.

    Whatever happened to a crisis creating strength, poise or grace under pressure? Gov. Jim Gibbons, faced with several crises, is not even able to handle the one in his own home, let alone the state's most urgent issues.

    On Monday, he confirmed the long-suspected, across-the-board budget cuts to some agencies. This process suggests, as I have previously commented, that a child's life carries the same importance as nonessential equipment supplies.

    The Department of Health and Human Services was given the directive last week to cut an additional 1.5 percent of its budget. The cuts amount to $109 million in areas that are among the state's most stressed, understaffed and underperforming. This is the department, in case you're wondering, that oversees licensing of the scoping mills that have unethically, immorally and illegally exposed people to life-threatening diseases.

    Why would Gibbons cut even more from Health and Human Services, and even now?

    Of course, in Gibbons' curious way of looking at the problem, the overall impact to the department's budget is 6.1 percent, the same impact other departments are facing to offset the state's economic woes. Never mind that many of the cuts are to areas that could actually save the state money long-term. It's easier to pay a little money up front for, say, inspectors or case workers or program nurses, than it is to manage a chronic illness or a community catastrophe.

    Speaking of catastrophes, I should have known that I'd be left wearing the dunce cap for saying something nice about the governor. In my March 18 column, I congratulated Gibbons for finally showing some, dare I say, leadership. He had called for the resignation of three doctors from the Board of Medical Examiners. The doctors had ties to disgraced "health center" owner Dipak Desai (I can't bring myself to call him a doctor anymore).

    Gibbons had asked them to step down so he could remove the taint of perceived conflicts. When tens of thousands of people have been told to get tested for hepatitis and HIV, Gibbons showed he actually was leading by trying to clean the state's house.

    Then the fool gene took over. He started complaining about media coverage of the scandal because "only six" people had contracted hepatitis C. When the doctors challenged the governor and refused to step down, Gibbons didn't act like the governor and go to bat for his beliefs -- he turned to Jell-O.

    It made me wonder for a moment what Mike O'Callaghan might have done had someone challenged him like that when he was governor. If a real man were in the mansion, Drs. Javaid Anwar, Daniel McBride and Sohail Anjum just might not have the privilege to practice medicine anymore.

    Here's just how spineless Gibbons has become. Not only did he buckle on the three doctors, he caved on asking for board Executive Director Tony Clark to resign, even as he said he thought Clark should still resign.

    Imagine if Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said she thought elections in Zimbabwe were tainted, but the process should be upheld. Instead, she called the country's president a "disgrace" to his people and to a whole continent.

    Here, when the fool on Mountain Street speaks, people don't just ignore him. They do exactly the opposite of what he says.

    Contact Erin Neff at eneff@reviewjournal.com or (702) 387-2906.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 7 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Al Katraz wrote on April 02, 2008 01:51 PM: lexushoneybee...John F. is correct. Why don't you spend less time thinking of allegedly clever ways to advertsie your taste for overpriced vehicles, and a little more time with the facts. For state inpsectors, regulators, and auditors it's all about caseload and Nevada's caseloads have always been way above average...resulting in services that are way below average. I'm sure you're afraid that if anyone were to raise taxes sufficient to provide adequate social services, you might have to change your moniker to "usedplymouthhoneybee."


    Bill Sharkey wrote on April 02, 2008 12:44 PM: Nevada has elected a governor that is even dumber than Bush. I can only wish upon the governor a colonoscopy from Dipak's clinic! In fact, give one to the Nevada voters too.

    Bill Sharkey


    John F wrote on April 01, 2008 09:07 PM: Bear,

    Erin Neff is not a reporter, she's a columnist. Her columns appear on the editorial page and are therefore opinion, not reporting. The same holds true for the columns of all the Republican lackeys that appear here as well.

    lexushoneybee,

    Would you care to be specific? Where is the fat you speak of? What, exactly, would you cut? It's a very popular thing to say we should cut the fat from government spending, but very few people who say this ever can say where the fat lies. I'm all for cutting unnecessary spending. Where is it?

    oldlawdawg,

    I believe you have a point about the legislature. How can we expect them to provide oversight - which is obviously quite sorely needed over so many state agencies - when they're only in session three months every two years?


    Bear wrote on April 01, 2008 01:59 PM: Why aren't you saying anything about the renovations being done in the capital. How much is that costing us Could it be that the Democrats are pushing for the spending and you as usual won't report anything negative about the Democrats. BTY where were Hillary's fundraising events held I don't think I ever saw that in print. Stop being the Democrats Lackey and be a reporter.


    oldlawdawg wrote on April 01, 2008 12:54 PM: Now is the time to question the wisdom of continuing with a part-time legislature that spends 90 days every two years legislating. While the legislators themselves are probably quite relieved they do not have to work full time on the state's economic woes and can, instead, dump it all on the Governor, a good number of state administrators operate under a delegation of legislative authority and, presumably, legislative oversight, as well. How that oversight can possibly be provided by a bunch of 90 day wonders is beyond comprehension. Perhaps it's time to consider a full-time legislature comprised of people who want to provide public service rather than wannabe pols desiring a salary, percs and prestige without actually legislating. The executive branch cannot get anything done when the Governor, whomever he/she may be, is the target of partisan and special interest criticism of every move he/she makes when he/she is the only one around to try and find solutions to complex problems without any legislative assitance, leadership or responsibility. If all our problems are left to the Governor and the Supreme Court, how are the interests of all Nevadans directly represented in the process? How is Nevada ever going to solve such massive problems when the only branch of government actively involved -- the Governor -- is hamstrug by partisan politics and media opportunism? Nevada needs a legislature that is on the job when the job needs to be done rather than absentees who sit on the sidelines taking partisan and special interest potshots at those trying to solve the state's problems. A full-time legislature is more urgently needed than the intermediate court of appeals being pushed by the Supreme Court, assuming we cannot afford both at once.


    lexushoneybee wrote on April 01, 2008 10:01 AM: It would be great if you would actually start using some critical thinking in your editorials. The Department of Health and Human Services, as is true for most state agencies, has plenty of fat to cut. The fact that state inspectors did not do their job has absolutely nothing to do with $$$$ and everything to do with their failure of leadership, which is sorely lacking in all of our state agencies. The Governor, through no fault of his own, is faced with some very difficult decisions and choices, many of which are unpopular but necessary. Let's support this effort since he seems the only one in state service willing to make these needed decisions with which to move us forward.


    oldlawdawg wrote on April 01, 2008 08:04 AM: Don't worry, Erin. You have April Fool's Day covered by default as you are a joke, a cheap trick and a fool every day, with today being no exception.