Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

Opinion
Apr. 13, 2008
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

ERIN NEFF: Lawmakers just hate term limits

ERIN NEFF
MORE COLUMNS

There's never really been any doubt that the term-limits overwhelmingly approved by Nevada voters would someday get a test in the courts.

It's just been a matter of when -- and by whom.

Nothing says bipartisan support in Nevada like an effort under way by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to quietly stoke that challenge.

Elected officials of both parties hate the looming term limits. The 2010 impact on the Legislature would be demonstrable, with Assembly Speaker Barbara Buckley, D-Las Vegas, out of a job. And the only thing that could pry the nameplate from Senate Majority Leader Bill Raggio, R-Reno, is term limits, a measure he also opposes.

Most Popular Stories
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Hillary's best hope: racism
  • EDITORIAL: It's now illegal to carry cash?
  • J.C. WATTS: Social conservatives still a political force
  • JOHN BRUMMETT: It's the worst of all worlds for the DemocratsCommentary
  • EDITORIAL: Billing Mrs. Fossett
  • EDITORIAL: Just 'trust our incumbent senators'
  • J.C. WATTS: Your side, my side and the truth
  • LETTERS: Tipping 'expert' a total cheapskate
  • ERIN NEFF: They just figured it was a lingerie supplier
  • LETTERS: To boost revenue, repeal smoking law



    • It's already highly evident where much of the power of the legislative process resides -- and it isn't in the 63 seats of the two chambers.

    Beyond stellar leaders such as Buckley and Raggio and a few outspoken legislators who know how to play the system inside and out of the building, the preponderance of power in Carson City is already "behind the glass" partition separating the gallery from the elected officials.

    Lobbyists representing a host of interests from gaming, mining, business, local government and social welfare organizations build their own alliances and try to game the system as best they can.

    Sometimes, a veteran lawmaker such as Raggio or his Senate Democratic leader Dina Titus, will preface a vote on a bill with a history lesson. Usually that history was culled from somewhere in the recesses of their memory from sessions long ago.

    But if Raggio, Titus, Buckley and company are gone, so too, are the memories.

    Just about one-third of lawmakers will lose their seats when the first round of term limits takes hold in 2010. A fair chunk of them would be sorely missed.

    But if reform is ever going to come to Carson City, it is going to have to include real, transparent lobbying reform.

    Under term limits, a lobbyist who has 20 years experience under his belt becomes more than just a powerful special interest. He is able to craft language, build political alliances and commandeer a measure for his client with relative ease.

    If you think the lobbyists already largely run the show, you're right. But it's always been the experienced lawmaker, from Randolph Townsend, R-Reno, to Bernice Mathews, D-Sparks, who has at times been able to put the lobbyists in check.

    At times.

    Reid of course is already hyper-focused on his re-election in 2010. Having loyal Democrats down ticket will help generate buzz, if not outright turnout, that spills up if his numbers continue to sag.

    Term limits may have passed twice here in 1994 and 1996, but voters tend to have short attention spans. And with both Republican nominee John McCain talking trash about special interests and likely Democratic nominee Barack Obama building an entire campaign around reform in Washington, voters will probably begin to focus more on lobbyists.

    Secretary of State Ross Miller has already shown he's a different kind of chief elections officer. He's already issued rules on recall petition gathering.

    He's also one of thoroughbreds in the Democratic stable being groomed for who knows what race.

    A more likely 2010 governor's candidate is Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto. Now, while her office may technically have jurisdiction to consider the legality of term limits, any such ruling would be controversial and could impact her as she runs statewide.

    What's more, she was chief of staff for Gov. Bob Miller (10 years in office), who knows a thing or two about challenging term limits.

    Voters generally have a throw-the-bums-out mentality when it comes to elected officials and term limit legislation is typically quite popular. And while there's little that engenders popular hatred more than runaway spending of tax dollars, some of the biggest bums in Carson City can't be thrown out even with term limits.

    Reid understands the political winds better than most politicians. What he sees currently in Nevada is a populist push to raise the gaming tax. That's the closest thing to a lock this election cycle (if it appears on the ballot).

    The same emotions that fuel that kind of momentum can easily be translated into a campaign against special interests.

    And if the valiant defenders of the public's interest just happen to be term-limited lawmakers, voters may not mind having their will usurped again.

    I mean, it's not as if the Legislature pays much attention to that other popular initiative that created the 120-day session.

    Nevada's part-time Legislature seems very antiquated when real crises arise, forcing lawmakers to take up critical issues in interim committees.

    The Legislative Committee on Health Care, for example, held special meetings and a community forum for those impacted by the hepatitis outbreak in Las Vegas. Legislative leaders are also working with the governor on the pressing $900 million shortfall in anticipated revenue.

    But not all interim work is as vital.

    Consider a meeting scheduled for tomorrow in Carson City.

    The Commission on Special License Plates will hold a hearing to determine whether conservation group Nevada Ducks Unlimited, Inc. "is or is not in compliance" with certain filing requirements.

    It's long past time for the whole special license plate racket in Nevada to have its swan song.

     

    Contact Erin Neff at eneff@reviewjournal.com or (702) 387-2906.

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 16 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    NLV Resident wrote on April 14, 2008 11:58 PM: A much better way to get incumbents to reconsider running for re-election is to bring into play their retirement benefits. If an incumbent loses re-election, the incumbent loses his or her retirement benefit -- period. I find it extremely frustrating that taxpayers continue to fund legislators -- both federal and state -- who are voted out of office and then are able to simply "retire." Put their retirement benefits at risk and you'll see more incumbents willingly decline to run for re-election.


    Zeke wrote on April 14, 2008 09:44 PM: It's about time that Nevada becomes realistic about our Governess and started have a session every year, like 48 of the other STates. We get what we pay for. Other the wealthy or corupt can be a Senator or Assemblperson in this STate-they only get paid while in session and that is silly.
    I realize that YOU don't agree, crazy Libertarians people, but like usual, you have been out in the sun too much without your hat, and are wrong about something else. Go figure. Oh yeah, in general Term limits are dumb and only guarantee that we get rid of people once they finally learn what to do. It is why our schools, roads and State departments are falling apart.


    Robert Spriesterbach wrote on April 14, 2008 12:11 PM: Erin didn't blame Bush or Gibbons? St. Reid is doing something wrong? Where is the REAL Ms. Neff?


    GEORGE wrote on April 14, 2008 03:59 AM: Start a new initiative to limit politicians to one term. Politicians will be so scared that they will drop opposition to the present 12 year limit.


    Raggio The Rino wrote on April 14, 2008 01:26 AM: You think we need lifetime legislators like Bill the Rino Raggio to put the lobbyists in check? He IS a lobbyist, go look at the lobbying law firm he works for! I find it hilarious that you would say "the valiant defenders of the public's interest just happen to be term-limited lawmakers." Ha! Go view the garbage that is passed out of these chambers, these bums are more like valiant defenders of the special interests!


    nvkorruption wrote on April 13, 2008 01:08 PM: 'Voters generally have a throw-the-bums-out mentality when it comes to elected officials and term limit legislation is typically quite popular'

    Nevada voters have been raped by elected officials. It shows everywhere. Corruption and special interests is out of control.

    This scenario is playing out as 'us against them'

    The situation is way wrong when elected officials team up against the voters and taxpayers that put them there.

    This is sick and should infuriate the public in this election year beyond just the polls.

    Its pathetic that the public has to draw a line against elected officials to protect the interests of the people of Nevada.

    SO BE IT!!!


    politik wrote on April 13, 2008 12:57 PM: Ducks Unlimited, Inc. wholesomely republican


    Don't forget wrote on April 13, 2008 11:58 AM: Children are a mirror of the parent. The fruit does not fall far from the tree. Nevada is in the worst condition ot has ever been. Yet, many of are politicans are the children of former politicians. They need to be voted out. We need new blood in Nevada.


    DJ wrote on April 13, 2008 11:55 AM: If it can be traced to Reid or Rogich it needs to go. Also, pay attention to the lawyers running for office. If you can trace them to Reid or Rogich dump them.


    Dave L wrote on April 13, 2008 10:52 AM: These legislators and their special interest financiers (who prefer that once the official is bought, they stay bought), would like us to forget that the scheme envisioned by our founding fathers was that our elected bodies should be composed of "citizen legislators", who after a season, return to the community....without term limits to ensure this occurs, we will have career legislators. Raggio has been legislating since when?! Nixon's presidency???? He is a lawyer for casinos, sat on the board for Sierra Health....hell, he's one of the best lobbyist around. Republican Senator Mark Amodei is presdent of Nevada Mining Asscoiation. What a lobbyist. Health care interests have Republican senators Joe Heck and Joe Hardy. The Home Builders have Republican senator Warren Hardy. Corporations naot wanting to pay a corpoarte tax have Republican Bob Beers as a lobbyist.

    The opposing special interest will remind committee members about the legislative history of this or that statute from years ago, and so will the written minutes.

    Me thinks that Miller is going to get a federal judgeship out of this!


    Read All Comments