Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

Opinion


LETTERS: Inquest results in another whitewash

To the editor:

After watching last week's coroner's inquest into the Feb. 12 killing of Deshira Selimaj, it is obvious that a healthy, 23-year-old Henderson policeman was in fear of his life from a 42-year-old woman who sells ice cream. Other cops testified to that, too.


Most Popular Stories
  • EDITORIAL: Stood her ground
  • LETTERS: A moral obligation to not bankrupt the country
  • VIN SUPRYNOWICZ: 'Allowed' to carry for self-defense
  • LETTERS: Nursery did the right thing with laborers
  • EDITORIAL: Numbers stink?
  • LETTERS: Teachers not most important learning variable
  • LETTERS: Agassi remains a good citizen
  • EDITORIAL: Gotta have faith
  • EDITORIAL: Clunk, clunk
  • LETTERS: Put aside re-election interests for nation's good




  • What a courageous bunch of public servants. Officer Luke Morrison, a two-year cop, could have been stabbed in his Kevlar vest, ruining his uniform in the process.

    Now that Mr. Morrison has been absolved of any responsibility, I propose that all concerned citizens join me in erecting a cedar post fence in front of the Henderson Police Department. I will provide all materials, including the fencing, nails and paint. And then we will all join in to paint the fence with the color "Henderson whitewash."

    Sure, we might be arrested and jailed, but this time the cameras will be rolling -- and justice would be served.

    Norman Petz

    HENDERSON

    Henderson, Iraq

    To the editor:

    I woke Saturday morning to the shocking news regarding a mother gunned down in front of her children because she posed a threat with a knife. The shooting was ruled justifiable.

    But the truly shocking part was that the news was not from Iraq, it was from Henderson.

    Patrick Lee

    LAS VEGAS

    Unfair system

    To the editor:

    After watching both days of the latest Clark County coroner's inquest, I would like to know how can this form of unfair justice can be allowed to continue in this day and age.

    I am a firm advocate of the police officers of all the cities in Clark County. I do not envy any officer of the law, and can only hope and pray that common sense becomes a part of police academy training.

    However, using two well-versed assistant district attorneys to throw softball questions at the Henderson police officers and then ask an overabundance of leading questions smacks of a district attorney-police mutual admiration society to me.

    This must be changed, and I will begin to lobby for just that. Please use your power of the press to stress the importance of an unbiased inquest system for Clark County.

    John R. Isselin

    LAS VEGAS

    Stop using Tasers

    To the editor:

    After watching part of the inquest into the shooting of Deshira Selimaj, I think the use of Tasers by police should be suspended until procedures for their use are changed.

    Training police that they have five seconds to subdue a person after that person has been hit by a Taser puts people's lives in jeopardy. If a person is holding a weapon, the police should not approach that person unless there is no other choice. Attempting to disarm this woman using a nonlethal method resulted in her death.

    I don't want the police putting their lives in danger trying to disarm a person. After a person has been hit by a Taser, they should be told to drop the weapon. If they don't and continue to move in a threatening manner, they have to be shot. The police should not be put in a position where they rush a person still holding a weapon. This shooting seems to have been justified. However, it might not have been necessary, had the Tasers not been used.

    Ron Gearhart

    LAS VEGAS

    What a phony

    To the editor:

    So now the Hillary Clinton campaign is accusing Sen. Barack Obama of being an "elitist?" This from a woman who (along with her down-to-earth husband) earned $110 million over the past few years and has known little or nothing other than politics for the past 30 years?

    Now she is attempting to show her "roots" by setting up photos of herself drinking beer and pounding shots at a local bar in Pennsylvania (Sunday Review-Journal). How low can you go to insult the American voter? I suppose next she'll take a trip to Nellis Air Force Base, sit in an F-15 for 10 minutes and then claim she's a fighter pilot.

    J.J. Schrader

    HENDERSON

    Raises deserved

    To the editor:

    Regarding your Thursday editorial, "On the chopping block":

    The reason state employee pay raises should not be on the chopping block is simple: Some, if not most of us, are doing the jobs of two people, not always in safe conditions, and certainly not ever under circumstances that remain constant. This is because of the vast population growth the Las Vegas Valley has been undergoing for some time now.

    Connie Cox

    HENDERSON

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 71 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    dwc wrote on April 16, 2008 08:55 AM: I followed with great interest this particular inquest, and it seemed that the vast focus was on the events that transpired AFTER HPD lost control of the traffic stop. So yeah, shooting justified in that context. As far as who was responsible for control of the traffic stop...

    Can't disagree with #1 buck in a cheap and effective 870. I hope I never have to shoot anyone ever again.


    Report abuse

    Jon H. wrote on April 16, 2008 06:51 AM: Sad Summerlin – your comments with regards to the adversarial process do have merit. The person who represents the side of the “not justified” and “Justified” are perhaps part of the problem and not the solution in an inquest process. What is needed, is a process that determines the truth. Perhaps we should pattern the process after our Military Courts, and always use investigators and Jurists that have no obligation to the people or organization being investigated.

    With regret, I say the present system does not have the appearance of seeking truth . . . and this is a problem. The Inquest system, has eroded the very “appearance of” integrity of our HPD. Many people no longer trust any police department.

    Lets face it, when we continue to rack up hundreds of officer involved shootings of often un-armed person who were thought to have a weapon, and nearly all are deemed justified it does cause a sane person to take pause and question those remarkable always “justified” results.


    Report abuse

    Bill wrote on April 15, 2008 10:45 PM: Norman, you're an idiot. Not only does a cop's vest NOT stop knives, but what if she were to slash his neck? Or do you subscribe to the school of thought that cops get paid to imitate pin cushions. Go take your angry little self and see your therapist.


    Report abuse

    Sad Summerlin wrote on April 15, 2008 10:20 PM: Ken - Dude, you have to explain to me the link between the Salem Witch hunts and the inquest process. If I remember my history correctly, the witch hunts we religious zealots attempting to cover up indiscretions or explain unknown phenomena at the expense of the lives of innocents. Maybe the witch hunts, not based on any codified law, but on religious emotion, were more like the McCarthy trials of the 50's. But I fail to see how the application of the law and process here has anything to do with that historical reference, but I may be wrong.

    Jon H - If we were to use the adversarial process, then who represents the side of "not justified"? Does the woman's husband hire an attorney to prove she wasn't acting aggressively? Does the State employ a "not justified" council for all matters before the inquest? Isn't that what the criminal and civil courts are for in the wrongful death lawsuits? (Which is guaranteed to happen here).

    Isn't an inquest a legal review of process? Did the Officer satisfy enough of the required conditions to merit discharging his weapon and using lethal force? That's the question asked of the inquest.

    It doesn't ask... was there a better way? It doesn't ask to be a Monday morning quarterback. It doesn't take into account the lives that were lost to influence the decision. There is no appeal on the basis of emotions... it is simply a factual process.

    Jon - I am with you. Put cameras everywhere. If I don't do anything wrong, I have nothing to worry about. I wonder how many other posters would feel the same?


    Report abuse

    Gerald Wm. Parks wrote on April 15, 2008 09:59 PM: Of course we are outraged at Deshira Selimaj's murder by the cops, but what are we going to do about it? Let's all write our congressman and demand a federal investigation. I've done it already.


    Report abuse

    Jon H. wrote on April 15, 2008 09:03 PM: Sad Summerlin

    I for one am not opposed, even with my Libertarian ways, to having surveillance cameras in public. I think it a great tool that could be used in a court of law to help determine the guilt or innocence those involved. It is unlikely that a cameral would of settled this issue, as we would likely never have enough cameras to cover every public area. As far as the Inquest process, in the US we have the adversarial process that is used in a regular court of law. I think this process needs to be applied to our "inquest process". If we were in England, the process would again be different, as you may already know.


    Report abuse

    Ken wrote on April 15, 2008 08:56 PM: "Hear, Hear" Jon


    Report abuse

    Ken wrote on April 15, 2008 08:53 PM: SS
    If not some, but just one of the Salem which hunt inquest were justified. Would they still be in the history books?


    Report abuse

    Jon H. wrote on April 15, 2008 08:51 PM: Ken wrote:

    "Assault rifles are great home protection as are shotguns. There not just for breakfast anymore."

    I would like to caution any and all about using a AK-47 7.62mmx39mm or 223 cartridge for home defense. Far too dangerous as the range and penetration of the cartridge will pass through a human target the wall of a home and be a danger to others in your neighborhood.

    I would never consider using an assault rifle for home defense, as if you ever got into a court room after using one, you would be taken to the cleaners. It is simply not the right weapon for the job, and a jury would likely view a person using a assault rifle as not being "normal".

    No, do as I do, and use a 12 gauge shotgun with #4 (my preference) or #1 buckshot (the hard core preference) as your home defense weapon. There is nothing like the sound of a Remington 870 pump cycling a round into the breach that will cause any sane person to pause and head for cover.

    Just remember, being prepared means that you are ready but you will most likely never use the weapon. For that reason, if you do choose to have a weapon ready, you must be ever diligent to maintain control of that weapon such that it is not misused and that it is always ready when needed. This takes discipline . . . and it is a discipline that must be maintained.

    If you don't have that needed discipline, I would suggest you leave your guns locked up. This recommendation is for the safety of you, your family and those that you love.

    Enough preaching . . . I am done.


    Report abuse

    Sad Summerlin wrote on April 15, 2008 08:08 PM: Jon H - When you bring the topic back to the "inquest process" it does open up the opportunity for a nice debate that takes us away from AK-47's and Ice Cream truck drivers...

    I am actually interested to hear other suggestions on how the process could be improved to make people more accepting or comfortable with the results.

    Ironically, we American's do not like the idea of unlimited surveillance (much like they have in London)... that would have provided a video review of what exactly happened. As you could see from the witnesses, many had different angles and differences and came to different conclusions and different reports on scene.

    So without video and with differing views of witnesses and bystanders... what other process do we use to determine justification in shootings?


    Read All Comments