Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

Opinion


EDITORIAL: Want a revolution?

Just eliminate income tax withholding

Today is not "tax day." It's "tax filing day."

It's not a new observation that, if this were a day when Americans were required to hand over in one lump sum a personal income tax applied to their wages and other gains of the previous calendar year, some form of revolution would not be far behind.

The stroke of genius that keeps the whole operation afloat, despite a combined tax rate much higher than the one that got the people of France up in arms in 1789, is called "withholding." The "withholding" levy -- initially at a rate of 20 percent -- was instituted in July 1943.

Before World War II, individuals who owed a federal tax paid during the following year in quarterly installments, reports economist Robert Higgs, editor of the quarterly journal of The Independent Institute.


Most Popular Stories
  • SHERMAN FREDERICK: Hillary's best hope: racism
  • J.C. WATTS: Your side, my side and the truth
  • J.C. WATTS: Social conservatives still a political force
  • JOHN BRUMMETT: It's the worst of all worlds for the DemocratsCommentary
  • EDITORIAL: Billing Mrs. Fossett
  • EDITORIAL: Just 'trust our incumbent senators'
  • LETTERS: Tipping 'expert' a total cheapskate
  • ERIN NEFF: They just figured it was a lingerie supplier
  • LETTERS: Judge gave drunken driver a wrist slap
  • LETTERS: To boost revenue, repeal smoking law



  • "In those days, relatively few people paid income taxes," Mr. Higgs writes. "As late as 1939, fewer than 4 million individual returns were filed, and the filers' total tax bill came to less than $1 billion, or less than 4 percent of their net taxable income."

    Beginning in 1940, though, as the government began to mobilize for war, its revenue demands grew enormously. "Federal spending burgeoned from $9 billion in fiscal year 1940 to more than $98 billion in fiscal year 1945. Although the greater part of this spending upsurge was financed by borrowing, huge increases in tax collections also took place," Mr. Higgs notes. "In 1945, 50 million individual income-tax returns were filed, and the filers owed more than $19 billion, or almost 20 times the amount that Americans had coughed up for this tax just five years earlier."

    Milton Friedman was an economist at the Treasury during the early part of the war. In his 1998 memoirs, "Two Lucky People," he recalled: "It was clear to all of us at the Treasury, as we set out to multiply the amount of revenue to be collected from the personal income tax, that it would be impossible to do so unless we could develop a system to collect the taxes as the income was earned, not a year later."

    The resulting system -- employer withholding -- has remained in effect continuously ever since 1943, even though the war that prompted its creation ended more than 62 years ago. And that system's perpetuation has contributed greatly to nourishing the postwar Leviathan state.

    As Charlotte Twight notes in her 2002 book, "Dependent on D.C.," "Withholding is the paramount administrative mechanism that since 1943 has enabled the federal government to collect, without significant protest, sufficient private resources to fund a vastly expanded welfare state."

    The Treasury itself acknowledges, in a fact sheet on the history of the U.S. tax system posted at its Web site, that wartime withholding not only "greatly eased the collection of the tax," but "also greatly reduced the taxpayer's awareness of the amount of tax being collected ... which made it easier to raise taxes in the future."

    Maybe that helps explain why, in 2005, more than 130 million individual income-tax forms were filed, yielding the federal government $1.108 trillion in revenue, with $787 billion (71 percent) of that amount already having been "painlessly" deducted from wage-earners who never saw it, through the miracle of withholding.

    If you want to end the current system in a hurry, just get rid of withholding, requiring all taxes to be paid in full on an actual "tax day."

    Then -- as long as you're going that far -- reset "tax day" from April to the first Monday in November, allowing voters to go to the polls freshly reminded of all those things for which they wish to give their elected office-holders their heartfelt thanks.

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 6 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    tim wrote on April 15, 2008 04:40 PM: with hillary or bama in office it will be tax time every day,with every new program!


    dwc wrote on April 15, 2008 02:55 PM: PS-

    Ignorance is always the easiest choice to make.

    Have a nice day!


    dwc wrote on April 15, 2008 02:53 PM: Russ-
    Plenty of American entrepreneurs have gone to Russia-with love hehehe- no- with an ambition to make money, and do just that. The Russian economy is user-friendly compared to our tax-and-spend system. They have an abundance of mid-to-high level educated people in their cities, unlike us. Plus, there's all those Russian brides!

    Those are 2 facts for you to check out, and I encourage you to do so.


    Russ wrote on April 15, 2008 07:25 AM: Mike L.....Why don't you move to Russia? Then report back on just how economically free they are. You need to check your facts before making such an idiotic statement.


    timinator wrote on April 15, 2008 06:35 AM: Thomas Jefferson:

    "A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor and bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government."

    "And to preserve their independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude."

    "I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them."

    Was the 16th amendment properly ratified? Is our nation suffering because of intrusive income tax and its destruction of our liberty? Why do our leaders only give lip service to eliminating it? What will it take before we finally force a change? Are we still the land of the free and home of the brave?


    Mike L. wrote on April 15, 2008 06:32 AM: Both China and Russia are freer economically than the US. Politically, maybe not, but our political system is obviously not working well when our choices are the socialists Obama, Hillary and some old dude.